• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高度近视黄斑裂孔性视网膜脱离的内界膜翻转瓣技术与内界膜剥除术的比较

Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for macular hole retinal detachment in high myopia compared to internal limiting membrane peeling.

作者信息

Nakano Hideyuki, Terashima Hiroko, Hasebe Hiruma, Fukuchi Takeo

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Science, Niigata, Japan.

Department of Ophthalmology, Niigata City General Hospital, Niigata, Japan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21537. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08269-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-08269-8
PMID:40594903
Abstract

Macular hole (MH) retinal detachment (MHRD) frequently causes severe visual impairment, mainly in older people with severe myopia and posterior staphyloma. Vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling is a treatment but has issues. The usefulness of an ILM inverted flap technique has not been clearly defined. Thus, we compared vitrectomy using this technique with vitrectomy using a complete ILM peeling technique for MHRD with severe myopia. The study included 29 patients (29 eyes) who underwent initial vitrectomy for MHRD with severe myopia between January 2011 and August 2019. The inverted ILM flap technique was used in 12 eyes (inverted group), and the complete ILM peeling technique was used in 17 eyes (peeling group). Clinical findings and outcomes were compared. In the peeling and inverted groups, the initial MH closure rate was 35.3% and 50% (p = 0.024) and the initial retinal reattachment rate was 82.4% and 75.0% (p = 0.630), respectively. The final retinal reattachment rate was 100% in both groups. The postoperative visual acuity during final consultation was better in the inverted than the peeling group. The inverted ILM flap technique may be more useful than the ILM peeling technique for MHRD in severely myopic eyes.

摘要

黄斑裂孔性视网膜脱离(MHRD)常导致严重视力损害,主要见于患有高度近视和后巩膜葡萄肿的老年人。玻璃体切除术联合内界膜(ILM)剥除术是一种治疗方法,但存在问题。ILM翻转瓣技术的有效性尚未明确界定。因此,我们比较了使用该技术的玻璃体切除术与使用完全ILM剥除技术的玻璃体切除术治疗高度近视性MHRD的效果。该研究纳入了2011年1月至2019年8月期间因高度近视性MHRD首次接受玻璃体切除术的29例患者(29只眼)。12只眼采用ILM翻转瓣技术(翻转组),17只眼采用完全ILM剥除技术(剥除组)。比较临床发现和结果。在剥除组和翻转组中,初始黄斑裂孔闭合率分别为35.3%和50%(p = 0.024),初始视网膜复位率分别为82.4%和75.0%(p = 0.630)。两组最终视网膜复位率均为100%。最终会诊时,翻转组的术后视力优于剥除组。对于高度近视眼的MHRD,ILM翻转瓣技术可能比ILM剥除技术更有用。

相似文献

1
Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for macular hole retinal detachment in high myopia compared to internal limiting membrane peeling.高度近视黄斑裂孔性视网膜脱离的内界膜翻转瓣技术与内界膜剥除术的比较
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21537. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08269-8.
2
Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling versus inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for macular hole-induced retinal detachment: a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis.玻璃体切除术联合内界膜剥除术与内界膜翻转瓣技术治疗黄斑裂孔性视网膜脱离:文献系统评价与Meta分析
BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Nov 28;17(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0619-8.
3
Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Macular Hole Retinal Detachment in High Myopia.倒置内界膜瓣与内界膜剥除术治疗高度近视黄斑裂孔性视网膜脱离的比较
Ophthalmol Retina. 2020 Sep;4(9):919-926. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2020.03.021. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
4
Inverted internal limiting membrane insertion versus standard internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole retinal detachment in high myopia: one-year study.高度近视黄斑裂孔视网膜脱离中内界膜内反式插入与标准内界膜剥离的比较:一年研究。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug;256(8):1387-1393. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-4046-1. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
5
Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique as a useful procedure for macular hole-associated retinal detachment in highly myopic eyes.内界膜翻转瓣技术作为高度近视眼黄斑裂孔相关视网膜脱离的一种有效手术方法。
Eye (Lond). 2017 Apr;31(4):545-550. doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.263. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
6
EFFICACY OF THE INVERTED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FLAP TECHNIQUE WITH VITRECTOMY FOR RETINAL DETACHMENT ASSOCIATED WITH MYOPIC MACULAR HOLES.玻璃体切除术联合倒转式内界膜瓣技术治疗近视性黄斑裂孔性视网膜脱离的疗效
Retina. 2017 Mar;37(3):466-471. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001211.
7
Drainage from intentional extramacular holes after internal limiting membrane insertion to treat macular hole retinal detachment in highly myopic eyes.高度近视眼中黄斑裂孔性视网膜脱离患者行内界膜植入术后黄斑外裂孔的引流情况
Int Ophthalmol. 2025 Jan 29;45(1):43. doi: 10.1007/s10792-025-03406-8.
8
PERFLUOROCARBON LIQUID-ASSISTED INVERTED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FLAP TECHNIQUE VERSUS INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING FOR HIGHLY MYOPIC MACULAR HOLE RETINAL DETACHMENT.全氟碳液体辅助反转内界膜瓣技术与内界膜撕除治疗高度近视黄斑孔性视网膜脱离的比较。
Retina. 2021 Feb 1;41(2):317-323. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002853.
9
Long-term surgical outcomes of the inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique in highly myopic macular hole retinal detachment.倒置内界膜瓣技术治疗高度近视黄斑裂孔性视网膜脱离的长期手术效果
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun;255(6):1101-1106. doi: 10.1007/s00417-017-3614-0. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
10
Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for large macular holes: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.用于治疗大黄斑裂孔的倒置内界膜瓣技术:一项系统评价和单臂荟萃分析。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun;256(6):1041-1049. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-3956-2. Epub 2018 Mar 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Drainage from intentional extramacular holes after internal limiting membrane insertion to treat macular hole retinal detachment in highly myopic eyes.高度近视眼中黄斑裂孔性视网膜脱离患者行内界膜植入术后黄斑外裂孔的引流情况
Int Ophthalmol. 2025 Jan 29;45(1):43. doi: 10.1007/s10792-025-03406-8.
2
Perfluorocarbon Liquid-Assisted Inverted Limiting Membrane Flap Technique Combined With Subretinal Fluid Drainage for Macular Hole Retinal Detachment in Highly Myopic Eyes.全氟碳液体辅助倒置性限制膜瓣技术联合视网膜下液引流治疗高度近视眼黄斑裂孔性视网膜脱离
Retina. 2022 Oct 1;42(10):2008-2012. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002600. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
3
INVERTED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FLAP TECHNIQUES AND OUTER RETINAL LAYER STRUCTURES.
内界膜瓣翻转技术与外层视网膜结构。
Retina. 2020 Jul;40(7):1299-1305. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002607.
4
Vitrectomy with inverted internal limiting membrane flap versus internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole retinal detachment in high myopia: a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis.玻璃体切割术联合内界膜翻转瓣与内界膜剥除术治疗高度近视黄斑裂孔视网膜脱离:文献系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eye (Lond). 2019 Oct;33(10):1626-1634. doi: 10.1038/s41433-019-0458-3. Epub 2019 May 9.
5
Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling versus inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for macular hole-induced retinal detachment: a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis.玻璃体切除术联合内界膜剥除术与内界膜翻转瓣技术治疗黄斑裂孔性视网膜脱离:文献系统评价与Meta分析
BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Nov 28;17(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0619-8.
6
INVERTED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FLAP TECHNIQUE FOR TREATMENT OF MACULAR HOLE RETINAL DETACHMENT IN HIGHLY MYOPIC EYES.高度近视眼中孔源性视网膜脱离的内界膜翻转瓣技术治疗
Retina. 2018 Dec;38(12):2317-2326. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001898.
7
EFFICACY OF THE INVERTED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FLAP TECHNIQUE WITH VITRECTOMY FOR RETINAL DETACHMENT ASSOCIATED WITH MYOPIC MACULAR HOLES.玻璃体切除术联合倒转式内界膜瓣技术治疗近视性黄斑裂孔性视网膜脱离的疗效
Retina. 2017 Mar;37(3):466-471. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001211.
8
Long-term surgical outcomes of the inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique in highly myopic macular hole retinal detachment.倒置内界膜瓣技术治疗高度近视黄斑裂孔性视网膜脱离的长期手术效果
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun;255(6):1101-1106. doi: 10.1007/s00417-017-3614-0. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
9
Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique as a useful procedure for macular hole-associated retinal detachment in highly myopic eyes.内界膜翻转瓣技术作为高度近视眼黄斑裂孔相关视网膜脱离的一种有效手术方法。
Eye (Lond). 2017 Apr;31(4):545-550. doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.263. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
10
Comparison of the Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique and the Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Macular Hole with Retinal Detachment.倒置内界膜瓣技术与内界膜剥除术治疗合并视网膜脱离的黄斑裂孔的比较
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 20;11(10):e0165068. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165068. eCollection 2016.