Suppr超能文献

采用Folfox 4方案肝动脉灌注化疗与顺铂联合吉西他滨治疗局部晚期肝内胆管癌的对比研究

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with Folfox 4 regimen versus cisplatin and gemcitabine for locally advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

作者信息

Liu Lin, Wang Huanhuan, Sun Liang, Liu Yufang, Zhang Yujing, Wang Xutian, Zheng Xin

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21588. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09586-8.

Abstract

For locally advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), the combination of cisplatin plus gemcitabine (CisGem) is the standard first-line treatment. However, the outcome remains unsatisfied with the median overall survival (OS) of 11.7 months. We aimed to compare the effect of CisGem regimen and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with Folfox 4 for locally advanced ICC. 97 Locally advanced ICC patients treated by CisGem regimen or HAIC with Folfox 4 in our institution from 2017 to 2019 were studied as training group. 43 locally advanced ICCs receiving CisGem chemotherapy or HAIC with Folfox 4 were investigated as validation group. The median OS was 14.5 months among 37 ICC patients from the HAIC group and 10.3 months among 60 ICC cases in the CisGem group. The median PFS in the HAIC group was 8.2 months in contrast to 5.3 months in the CisGem group. Additionally, objective response rate (ORR) in the HAIC group was markedly better than one in the CisGem group (29.7% v 5.0%). Patients from the HAIC group suffered from less AE (particularly 3-4 grade AE) than those in the CisGem group. The prediction nomogram models for OS and PFS were built respectively after Cox multivariate analysis, which were confirmed to be clinically useful by external validation cohort. These data here suggested HAIC with Folfox 4 was a potential first-line treatment option for local advanced ICC.

摘要

对于局部晚期肝内胆管癌(ICC),顺铂联合吉西他滨(CisGem)是标准的一线治疗方案。然而,其治疗效果仍不尽人意,中位总生存期(OS)为11.7个月。我们旨在比较CisGem方案与肝动脉灌注化疗(HAIC)联合Folfox 4方案治疗局部晚期ICC的效果。对2017年至2019年在我院接受CisGem方案或HAIC联合Folfox 4方案治疗的97例局部晚期ICC患者作为训练组进行研究。对43例接受CisGem化疗或HAIC联合Folfox 4方案治疗的局部晚期ICC患者作为验证组进行调查。HAIC组37例ICC患者的中位OS为14.5个月,CisGem组60例ICC患者的中位OS为10.3个月。HAIC组的中位无进展生存期(PFS)为8.2个月,而CisGem组为5.3个月。此外,HAIC组的客观缓解率(ORR)明显优于CisGem组(29.7%对5.0%)。HAIC组患者的不良事件(尤其是3-4级不良事件)比CisGem组少。在Cox多因素分析后分别建立了OS和PFS的预测列线图模型,经外部验证队列证实具有临床实用性。此处这些数据表明,HAIC联合Folfox 4方案是局部晚期ICC潜在的一线治疗选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验