Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugene Marquis, Rennes, France.
Cancer Treat Rev. 2020 Mar;84:101936. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2019.101936. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
Biliary tract cancer, including cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and gallbladder cancer (GBC) are rare tumours with a rising incidence. Prognosis is poor, since most patients are diagnosed with advanced disease. Only ~20% of patients are diagnosed with early-stage disease, suitable for curative surgery. Despite surgery performed with potentially-curative intent, relapse rates are high, with around 60-70% of patients expected to have disease recurrence. Most relapses occur in the form of distant metastases, with a predominance of liver spread. In view of high tumour recurrence, adjuvant strategies have been explored for many years, in the form of radiotherapy, chemo-radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Historically, few randomised trials were available, which included a variety of additional tumours (e.g. pancreatic and ampullary tumours); most evidence relied on phase II and retrospective studies, with no high-quality evidence available to define the real benefit derived from adjuvant strategies. Since 2017, three randomised phase III clinical trials have been reported; all recruited patients with resected biliary tract cancer (CCA and GBC) who were randomised to observation alone, or chemotherapy in the form of gemcitabine (BCAT study; included patients diagnosed with extrahepatic CCA only), gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (PRODIGE-12/ACCORD-18; included patients diagnosed with CCA and GBC) or capecitabine (BILCAP; included patients diagnosed with CCA and GBC). While gemcitabine-based chemotherapy failed to show an impact on patient outcome (relapse-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS)), the BILCAP study showed a benefit from adjuvant capecitabine in terms of OS (pre-planned sensitivity analysis in the intention-to-treat population and in the per-protocol analysis), with confirmed benefit in terms of RFS. Based on the BILCAP trial, international guidelines recommend adjuvant capecitabine for a period of six months following potentially curative resection of CCA as the current standard of care for resected CCA and GBC. However, BILCAP failed to show OS benefit in the intention-to-treat (non-sensitivity analysis) population (primary end-point), and this finding, as well as some inconsistencies between studies has been criticised and has led to confusion in the biliary tract cancer medical community. This review summarises the adjuvant field in biliary tract cancer, with evidence before and after 2017, and comparison between the latest randomised phase III studies. Potential explanations are presented for differential findings, and future steps are explored.
胆道癌包括胆管癌(CCA)和胆囊癌(GBC),是发病率不断上升的罕见肿瘤。由于大多数患者被诊断为晚期疾病,因此预后较差。只有约 20%的患者被诊断为早期疾病,适合进行根治性手术。尽管进行了有根治可能的手术,但复发率仍然很高,约 60-70%的患者预计会出现疾病复发。大多数复发表现为远处转移,以肝转移为主。鉴于高肿瘤复发率,多年来一直在探索辅助治疗策略,包括放疗、放化疗和化疗。从历史上看,只有少数随机试验可用,这些试验包括各种其他肿瘤(例如胰腺和壶腹肿瘤);大多数证据依赖于 II 期和回顾性研究,没有高质量的证据可确定辅助治疗策略带来的真正益处。自 2017 年以来,已经报告了三项随机 III 期临床试验;所有试验均招募了接受根治性手术的胆道癌(CCA 和 GBC)患者,这些患者被随机分配至观察组或吉西他滨化疗组(BCAT 研究;仅包括肝外 CCA 患者)、吉西他滨联合奥沙利铂化疗组(PRODIGE-12/ACCORD-18 研究;包括 CCA 和 GBC 患者)或卡培他滨化疗组(BILCAP 研究;包括 CCA 和 GBC 患者)。虽然吉西他滨为基础的化疗未能显示对患者预后(无复发生存(RFS)或总生存(OS))的影响,但 BILCAP 研究显示辅助卡培他滨治疗在 OS 方面有获益(在意向治疗人群和方案分析中进行了预先计划的敏感性分析),在 RFS 方面也有确认的获益。基于 BILCAP 试验,国际指南建议对可切除的 CCA 进行辅助性卡培他滨治疗 6 个月,作为可切除 CCA 和 GBC 的当前标准治疗。然而,BILCAP 未能在意向治疗(非敏感性分析)人群(主要终点)中显示 OS 获益,这一发现以及研究之间的一些不一致性受到了批评,并导致胆道癌医学界的困惑。本综述总结了 2017 年之前和之后胆道癌的辅助治疗领域,并比较了最新的随机 III 期研究。提出了对不同研究结果的潜在解释,并探讨了未来的步骤。