• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于预测体外受精周期中囊胚产量的机器学习模型的开发与验证

Development and validation of machine learning models for predicting blastocyst yield in IVF cycles.

作者信息

Huo Wen-Jie, Peng Fei, Quan Song, Wang Xiao-Cong

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Department of Psychology, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):22631. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06998-4.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-06998-4
PMID:40596532
Abstract

Predicting blastocyst formation poses significant challenges in reproductive medicine and critically influences clinical decision-making regarding extended embryo culture. While previous research has primarily focused on determining whether an IVF cycle can produce at least one blastocyst, less attention has been given to quantifying blastocyst yields. This study aims to develop and validate such a quantitative predictive tool for IVF cycles. We employed three machine learning models-SVM, LightGBM, and XGBoost-which demonstrated comparable performance and outperformed traditional linear regression models (R: 0.673-0.676 vs. 0.587, Mean absolute error: 0.793-0.809 vs. 0.943). Ultimately, LightGBM emerged as the optimal model, due to utilizing fewer features (8 vs. 10-11 in SVM/XGBoost) and offering superior interpretability. We then stratified predictions and actual yields into three categories (0, 1-2, and ≥ 3 blastocysts) to evaluate the model's discriminative performance. In this multi-classification task, LightGBM demonstrated robust accuracy (0.675-0.71) with fair-to-moderate agreement (kappa coefficients: 0.365-0.5) across both the overall cohort and poor-prognosis subgroups. Feature importance analysis identified three critical predictors: the number of extended culture embryos, the mean cell number on Day 3, and the proportion of 8-cell embryos. By leveraging the potential of machine learning, this research provides clinicians with valuable insights for making individualized decisions regarding extended embryo culture.

摘要

预测囊胚形成在生殖医学中面临重大挑战,并且对关于延长胚胎培养的临床决策有着至关重要的影响。虽然先前的研究主要集中在确定体外受精(IVF)周期是否能产生至少一个囊胚,但对囊胚产量的量化关注较少。本研究旨在开发并验证一种用于IVF周期的定量预测工具。我们采用了三种机器学习模型——支持向量机(SVM)、轻量级梯度提升机(LightGBM)和极端梯度提升(XGBoost)——它们表现出可比的性能,并且优于传统线性回归模型(相关系数:0.673 - 0.676对比0.587,平均绝对误差:0.793 - 0.809对比0.943)。最终,LightGBM成为最优模型,因为它使用的特征较少(8个,而SVM/XGBoost为10 - 11个)且具有更好的可解释性。然后,我们将预测结果和实际产量分为三类(0个、1 - 2个和≥3个囊胚),以评估模型的判别性能。在这个多分类任务中,LightGBM在整个队列和预后不良亚组中都表现出稳健的准确性(0.675 - 0.71),一致性从中等到良好(卡帕系数:0.365 - 0.5)。特征重要性分析确定了三个关键预测因素:延长培养胚胎的数量、第3天的平均细胞数以及8细胞胚胎的比例。通过利用机器学习的潜力,本研究为临床医生在做出关于延长胚胎培养的个性化决策时提供了有价值的见解。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of machine learning models for predicting blastocyst yield in IVF cycles.用于预测体外受精周期中囊胚产量的机器学习模型的开发与验证
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):22631. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06998-4.
2
Supervised Machine Learning Models for Predicting Sepsis-Associated Liver Injury in Patients With Sepsis: Development and Validation Study Based on a Multicenter Cohort Study.用于预测脓毒症患者脓毒症相关肝损伤的监督式机器学习模型:基于多中心队列研究的开发与验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 26;27:e66733. doi: 10.2196/66733.
3
Novel application of metabolic imaging of early embryos using a light-sheet on-a-chip device: a proof-of-concept study.使用片上光片装置对早期胚胎进行代谢成像的新应用:一项概念验证研究。
Hum Reprod. 2025 Jan 1;40(1):41-55. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae249.
4
The clinical impact of oligozoospermia in oocyte donation ICSI cycles using preimplantation genetic test for aneuploidy.在使用植入前非整倍体基因检测的卵母细胞捐赠ICSI周期中,少精子症的临床影响。
Hum Reprod. 2025 May 13. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaf080.
5
Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance.辅助生殖技术中卵母细胞、胚胎和囊胚冷冻保存:比较慢速冷冻与玻璃化冷冻的系统评价和荟萃分析,为制定全球指南提供证据。
Hum Reprod Update. 2017 Mar 1;23(2):139-155. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmw038.
6
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
7
Cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.卵裂期胚胎与囊胚期胚胎在辅助生殖技术中的移植。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 19;5(5):CD002118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub6.
8
Stabilizing machine learning for reproducible and explainable results: A novel validation approach to subject-specific insights.稳定机器学习以获得可重复和可解释的结果:一种针对特定个体见解的新型验证方法。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2025 Jun 21;269:108899. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2025.108899.
9
A randomized controlled trial comparing embryo vitrification with slush nitrogen to liquid nitrogen in women undergoing frozen embryo transfer: embryology and clinical outcomes.一项针对接受冻融胚胎移植的女性,比较胚胎玻璃化冷冻使用半融氮与液氮的随机对照试验:胚胎学及临床结局
Hum Reprod. 2025 Mar 1;40(3):426-433. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaf003.
10
A Responsible Framework for Assessing, Selecting, and Explaining Machine Learning Models in Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes Among People With Type 2 Diabetes: Methodology and Validation Study.用于评估、选择和解释2型糖尿病患者心血管疾病结局机器学习模型的责任框架:方法与验证研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Jun 27;13:e66200. doi: 10.2196/66200.

本文引用的文献

1
A cycle-based model to predict no usable blastocyst formation following cycles of in vitro fertilization in patients with normal ovarian reserve.一种基于周期的模型,用于预测卵巢储备功能正常的患者在体外受精周期后未形成可用囊胚的情况。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025 Jan 22;23(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12958-024-01327-2.
2
Optimal embryo management strategies for patients undergoing antagonist protocols in IVF treatment.体外受精治疗中接受拮抗剂方案患者的最佳胚胎管理策略
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 Mar;42(3):827-838. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03365-6. Epub 2024 Dec 31.
3
Objective causal predictions from observational data.
来自观测数据的客观因果预测。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2024 Nov;54(10):895-924. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2399856. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
4
Cumulative live birth rate of a blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer policy during in vitro fertilisation in women with a good prognosis: multicentre randomised controlled trial.体外受精时,针对预后良好的女性采用囊胚移植与卵裂期胚胎移植策略的累积活产率:多中心随机对照试验
BMJ. 2024 Sep 16;386:e080133. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-080133.
5
TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods.TRIPOD+AI 声明:报告使用回归或机器学习方法的临床预测模型的更新指南。
BMJ. 2024 Apr 16;385:e078378. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-078378.
6
Competent blastocyst and receptivity endometrium improved clinical pregnancy in fresh embryo transfer cycles: a retrospective cohort study.囊胚质量和子宫内膜容受性提高新鲜胚胎移植周期的临床妊娠率:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Apr 11;24(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06399-x.
7
Predictive Factors for the Formation of Viable Embryos in Subfertile Patients with Diminished Ovarian Reserve: A Clinical Prediction Study.预测卵巢储备功能减退的不孕患者形成可存活胚胎的因素:一项临床预测研究。
Reprod Sci. 2024 Jun;31(6):1747-1756. doi: 10.1007/s43032-024-01469-z. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
8
A brief history of artificial intelligence embryo selection: from black-box to glass-box.人工智能胚胎选择的简史:从黑箱到玻璃箱。
Hum Reprod. 2024 Feb 1;39(2):285-292. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead254.
9
Machine learning approaches in microbiome research: challenges and best practices.微生物组研究中的机器学习方法:挑战与最佳实践
Front Microbiol. 2023 Sep 22;14:1261889. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1261889. eCollection 2023.
10
Predicting the number of oocytes retrieved from controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with machine learning.利用机器学习预测控制性卵巢超刺激中获取的卵母细胞数量。
Hum Reprod. 2023 Oct 3;38(10):1918-1926. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead163.