Li Chenxi, Sun Mingyang, Zhang Luyao, Wang Guangzhi, Lu Jie, Xie Zhongcong, Zhang Jiaqiang
Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, No. 7, Weiwu Road, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450003, China.
Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, College of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, PR China.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03178-9.
Optimization of the individual topicalization technique during awake tracheal intubation (ATI) is critical, but how to accomplish this is still unknown. We hypothesized that there would be a difference between nebulization with different sizes of 2% lidocaine atomized particles in ATI by video laryngoscopy.
A total of 230 patients scheduled for ATI were recruited from September 2024 through January 2025. Forty-six participants were excluded, and 184 participants were randomly assigned to 4 treatment groups according to the size of the atomized particles of 2% lidocaine: A3 (3-4 μm), A6 (6-7 μm), A9 (9-10 μm), or A11 (11-12 μm).
There were statistically significant differences among the four groups. Post hoc analysis using Dunnett test showed that, compared with the A3 group, the A9 group had greater feelings of comfort (cough score: P = 0.005; reaction score: P = 0.024; discomfort score: P = 0.003). the A9 group had lower heart rates at endotracheal tube insertion(P = 0.015), at inflation of the tracheal tube cuff (P = 0.001) and 1 min after endotracheal tube insertion(P = 0.009); The A9 group had fewer applications of the airway spray and fewer times the patient vomited (P<0.001), but exhibited a longer nebulization time (P<0.0001).
In conclusion, we demonstrated that there were differences between nebulization with different sizes of 2% lidocaine atomized particles in ATI. In addition, 2% lidocaine administered via a nebulizer with 9-10-µm atomized particles performed better during ATI. Therefore, we recommend a nebulizer and the 9-10-µm particle-size range for patients who need ATI.
Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT06420947. Date of Registration: May 12th, 2024.
清醒气管插管(ATI)期间个体局部麻醉技术的优化至关重要,但如何实现这一点仍不清楚。我们假设在视频喉镜引导下的ATI中,不同大小的2%利多卡因雾化颗粒雾化给药之间会存在差异。
2024年9月至2025年1月共招募了230例计划进行ATI的患者。排除46名参与者,184名参与者根据2%利多卡因雾化颗粒的大小随机分为4个治疗组:A3组(3 - 4μm)、A6组(6 - 7μm)、A9组(9 - 10μm)或A11组(11 - 12μm)。
四组之间存在统计学显著差异。使用Dunnett检验的事后分析表明,与A3组相比,A9组舒适度更高(咳嗽评分:P = 0.005;反应评分:P = 0.024;不适评分:P = 0.003)。A9组在气管插管时(P = 0.015)、气管导管套囊充气时(P = 0.001)和气管插管后1分钟时(P = 0.009)心率较低;A9组气道喷雾应用次数更少,患者呕吐次数更少(P < 0.001),但雾化时间更长(P < 0.0001)。
总之,我们证明了在ATI中不同大小的2%利多卡因雾化颗粒雾化给药之间存在差异。此外,在ATI期间,通过雾化颗粒大小为9 - 10μm的雾化器给予2%利多卡因效果更好。因此,对于需要ATI的患者,我们推荐使用雾化器以及9 - 10μm的颗粒大小范围。
Clinicaltrials.gov,NCT06420947。注册日期:2024年5月12日。