Suppr超能文献

用于清醒纤维支气管镜插管的局部气道麻醉:气道神经阻滞与超声雾化器雾化利多卡因的比较。

Topical airway anesthesia for awake fiberoptic intubation: Comparison between airway nerve blocks and nebulized lignocaine by ultrasonic nebulizer.

作者信息

Gupta Babita, Kohli Santvana, Farooque Kamran, Jalwal Gopal, Gupta Deepak, Sinha Sumit

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Department of Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Saudi J Anaesth. 2014 Nov;8(Suppl 1):S15-9. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.144056.

Abstract

OVERVIEW

Awake fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) guided intubation is the gold standard of airway management in patients with cervical spine injury. It is essential to sufficiently anesthetize the upper airway before the performance of awake FOB guided intubation in order to ensure patient comfort and cooperation. This randomized controlled study was performed to compare two methods of airway anesthesia, namely ultrasonic nebulization of local anesthetic and performance of airway blocks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 50 adult patients with cervical spine injury were randomly allocated into two groups. Group L received airway anesthesia through ultrasonic nebulization of 10 ml of 4% lignocaine and Group NB received airway blocks (bilateral superior laryngeal and transtracheal recurrent laryngeal) each with 2 ml of 2% lignocaine and viscous lignocaine gargles. FOB guided orotracheal intubation was then performed. Hemodynamic variables at baseline and during the procedure, patient recall, vocal cord visibility, ease of intubation, coughing/gagging episodes, and signs of lignocaine toxicity were noted.

RESULTS

The observations did not reveal any significant differences in demographics or hemodynamic parameters at any time during the study. However, the time taken for intubation was significantly lower in Group NB as compared with the Group L. Group L had an increased number of coughing/gagging episodes as compared with Group NB. Vocal cord visibility and ease of intubation were better in patients who received airway blocks and hence the amount of supplemental lignocaine used was less in this group. Overall patient comfort was better in Group NB with fewer incidences of unpleasant recalls as compared with Group L.

CONCLUSION

Upper airway blocks provide better quality of anesthesia than lignocaine nebulization as assessed by patient recall of procedure, coughing/gagging episodes, ease of intubation, vocal cord visibility, and time taken to intubate.

摘要

概述

清醒纤维支气管镜(FOB)引导下插管是颈椎损伤患者气道管理的金标准。在进行清醒FOB引导下插管前,充分麻醉上气道对于确保患者舒适与配合至关重要。本随机对照研究旨在比较两种气道麻醉方法,即局部麻醉药超声雾化和气道阻滞。

材料与方法

共50例成年颈椎损伤患者被随机分为两组。L组通过超声雾化10ml 4%利多卡因进行气道麻醉,NB组接受气道阻滞(双侧喉上神经和经气管喉返神经阻滞),每组均使用2ml 2%利多卡因及利多卡因粘性含漱液。然后进行FOB引导下经口气管插管。记录基线及操作过程中的血流动力学变量、患者回忆、声带可视度、插管难易程度、咳嗽/呛咳发作情况以及利多卡因毒性体征。

结果

研究期间任何时间的人口统计学或血流动力学参数观察均未显示出显著差异。然而,NB组的插管时间显著低于L组。与NB组相比,L组咳嗽/呛咳发作次数增加。接受气道阻滞患者的声带可视度和插管难易程度更好,因此该组使用的补充利多卡因量较少。与L组相比,NB组患者总体舒适度更好,不愉快回忆发生率更低。

结论

通过患者对操作的回忆、咳嗽/呛咳发作情况、插管难易程度、声带可视度以及插管所需时间评估,上气道阻滞比利多卡因雾化提供了更好的麻醉质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ddd/4268521/6b659d6fa1ce/SJA-8-15-g003.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验