Chen Yijun, Albert Ally L, Sehrawat Anuradha, Farinas Marissa F, L Lopez Oscar, Zeng Xuemei, Cohen Ann D, Karikari Thomas K
Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Chemistry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Neurochem. 2025 Jul;169(7):e70114. doi: 10.1111/jnc.70114.
Phosphorylated tau (p-tau) 217 is a promising blood biomarker for Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, most p-tau217 assays have been validated solely in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) plasma, leaving the clinical applicability of serum p-tau217 largely unexplored despite serum being a preferred matrix in many clinical laboratories. To address this gap, we compared p-tau217 concentrations and classification accuracies in matched plasma and serum samples in four research-use-only assays. Paired plasma and serum samples were processed from the same venipuncture collection and assessed with each of the four p-tau217 assays following manufacturer-recommended procedures in two research cohorts from the University of Pittsburgh Azheimer's Disease Research Center (Pitt-ADRC; n = 50) and the Human Connectome Project (n = 34). The four assays evaluated included three from commercial sources-Lumipulse (recently gained FDA approval), ALZpath, and NULISA-and another from the University of Pittsburgh (Pittsburgh plasma p-tau217). Plasma and serum p-tau217 levels varied across assays; the ALZpath, Pittsburgh, and NULISA methods showed significantly lower p-tau217 levels in serum compared with plasma (p < 0.0001) for both cohorts, while Lumipulse showed higher plasma levels in the Pitt-ADRC cohort but equivalent plasma and serum levels in the HCP cohort. Yet, strong correlations (rho > 0.8) were observed between plasma and serum p-tau217 pairs for all methods. Both plasma and serum p-tau217 demonstrated strong classification accuracies to differentiate clinical AD from normal controls, with high AUC (up to 0.963) for all methods. The exception was the Pittsburgh assay, where plasma p-tau217 had significantly superior AUC to serum p-tau217 (plasma: 0.912, serum: 0.844). The rest of the assays had equivalent accuracies in both matrices. Serum p-tau217 performs equivalently as plasma p-tau217 for most assessed assays. Serum can be used as a substitute for plasma in the use of most p-tau217 assays to evaluate Aβ pathology in AD for both research and clinical purposes.
磷酸化tau蛋白(p-tau)217是一种很有前景的阿尔茨海默病(AD)血液生物标志物。然而,大多数p-tau217检测仅在乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)血浆中得到验证,尽管血清是许多临床实验室首选的样本基质,但血清p-tau217的临床适用性在很大程度上仍未得到探索。为了填补这一空白,我们在四项仅供研究使用的检测中比较了配对血浆和血清样本中的p-tau217浓度及分类准确性。配对的血浆和血清样本来自同一静脉穿刺采集,并按照制造商推荐的程序,在匹兹堡大学阿尔茨海默病研究中心(Pitt-ADRC;n = 50)和人类连接组计划(n = 34)的两个研究队列中,使用四种p-tau217检测方法进行评估。所评估的四种检测方法包括三种商业来源的方法——Lumipulse(最近获得了美国食品药品监督管理局的批准)、ALZpath和NULISA,以及另一种来自匹兹堡大学的方法(匹兹堡血浆p-tau217)。不同检测方法中血浆和血清的p-tau217水平有所不同;对于两个队列,ALZpath、匹兹堡和NULISA方法显示血清中的p-tau217水平显著低于血浆(p < 0.0001),而Lumipulse方法在Pitt-ADRC队列中显示血浆水平较高,但在人类连接组计划队列中血浆和血清水平相当。然而,所有方法的血浆和血清p-tau217配对之间均观察到强相关性(rho > 0.8)。血浆和血清p-tau217在区分临床AD与正常对照方面均表现出很强的分类准确性,所有方法的曲线下面积(AUC)都很高(高达0.963)。例外的是匹兹堡检测方法,其中血浆p-tau217的AUC显著优于血清p-tau217(血浆:0.912,血清:0.844)。其余检测方法在两种样本基质中的准确性相当。对于大多数评估的检测方法,血清p-tau217的表现与血浆p-tau217相当。在大多数p-tau217检测中,血清可替代血浆用于研究和临床目的,以评估AD中的淀粉样蛋白β病理情况。