Bridging the Gap Between Research and Policy: Exploring Political Determinants of Immigrant Health in an Urban County With High Cervical Cancer Disparities.

BackgroundCervical cancer disproportionally burdens Hispanic immigrant communities in the United States, despite its preventable nature and curability when detected early. These persistent disparities represent a "wicked problem," characterized by contested evidence, fragmented data, and a politicized health policy environment.MethodsThis study uses Tarrant County, Texas-a high-disparity urban region-as a case study to explore how multilevel governance structures shape immigrant health inequities. Drawing on the concept of wicked problems and the political determinants of health (PDoH) framework, we analyze archival data through a policy science lens to examine how electoral, legal, and institutional forces perpetuate barriers to life-saving care for immigrant women.ResultsFour key themes emerged from our analysis: (1) a reactive political environment that amplifies exclusion, (2) decision-making shaped by legal ambiguity, (3) passive enforcement of immigration policies through institutional design, and (4) blame-shifting between public and private healthcare systems. These dynamics collectively sustain health disparities by limiting access to preventive care and delaying treatment among immigrant populations.ConclusionFindings demonstrate that cervical cancer disparities are not solely the result of individual health behaviors but are produced and sustained by structural and political forces. Addressing these disparities requires interdisciplinary partnerships and place-based strategies that confront the institutional barriers embedded in local governance. We call for strategic alliances among researchers, community stakeholders, and policymakers to foster shared accountability and develop responsive, equity-driven policies for addressing cervical cancer and other preventable conditions in immigrant communities.