Zhou Yiwen, Guo Fengxiang, Wang Xiaoan, Cai Jing
Faculty of Transportation Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China.
Transportation Safety Research Center, Yunnan Transportation Science Research Institute Co., Ltd, Kunming, China.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2025 Jul 2:1-10. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2025.2513398.
The aim of this research was to explore the changes in eye movement characteristics, driving reaction, and operation performance of older drivers under different intersection conflict scenarios and to investigate the impact of subjective workload on hazard perception performance of older drivers.
A driving simulation experiment was conducted to simulate various intersection conflict risk scenarios, and data on driving behavior and visual characteristics were collected from 47 middle-aged and older drivers. The NASA-Task Load Index (TLX) scale was utilized to assess subjective workload across six dimensions: Mental Demands, Physical Demands, Temporal Demands, Own Performance, Effort, and Frustration. This study analyzed drivers' subjective workload, eye movement characteristics, driving responses, and performance under different conflict risk scenarios. The rank sum ratio method was employed for a comprehensive evaluation of subjective workload, categorizing participants into low-, moderate-, and high-workload groups. Differences in eye movement patterns, driving responses, and performance across these groups were subsequently examined. Furthermore, the XGBoost-SHAP model was applied to explore the impact of subjective workload on hazard perception performance.
The results show significant differences in Mental Demands, Physical Demands, Temporal Demands, and Frustration levels between older drivers in different conflict scenarios (such as pedestrians, cars, and motorcycles), with lower subjective workload reported in car conflict scenarios compared to others. In motorcycle and pedestrian conflict scenarios, older drivers exhibited heightened visual alertness and attention, while their driving responses and operational behaviors were notably more cautious. Additionally, in left-turn scenarios, drivers displayed more frequent visual searches and driving maneuvers. As subjective workload increased, older drivers' average fixation time and scanning intensity in conflict risk areas showed a marked increase, while vertical eye movements and pupil diameter exhibited a downward trend. Simultaneously, indicators such as brake response time, average speed, steering wheel angle, lateral acceleration, and pedal opening and closing degree all showed a decreasing trend. Importantly, the analysis revealed that the three dimensions of Own Performance, Mental Demands, and Physical Demands in the subjective workload assessment positively influenced older drivers' hazard perception performance, with Own Performance having the greatest impact. In contrast, the effects of Effort and Frustration were relatively smaller, and Temporal Demands had the least influence.
Results show a significant association between driving subjective workload and hazard perception performance among older drivers. It is possible to consider how to utilize subjective workload assessment to identify drivers with poor hazard perception performance and potentially help older drivers improve driving safety.
本研究旨在探讨不同交叉路口冲突场景下老年驾驶员的眼动特征、驾驶反应及操作性能的变化,并研究主观工作负荷对老年驾驶员危险感知性能的影响。
进行了一项驾驶模拟实验,以模拟各种交叉路口冲突风险场景,并从47名中老年驾驶员收集驾驶行为和视觉特征数据。采用NASA任务负荷指数(TLX)量表从心理需求、身体需求、时间需求、自身表现、努力程度和受挫感六个维度评估主观工作负荷。本研究分析了驾驶员在不同冲突风险场景下的主观工作负荷、眼动特征、驾驶反应和性能。采用秩和比法对主观工作负荷进行综合评价,将参与者分为低、中、高工作负荷组。随后考察了这些组之间眼动模式、驾驶反应和性能的差异。此外,应用XGBoost-SHAP模型探讨主观工作负荷对危险感知性能的影响。
结果显示,不同冲突场景(如行人、汽车和摩托车)下老年驾驶员在心理需求、身体需求、时间需求和受挫感水平上存在显著差异,与其他场景相比,汽车冲突场景下的主观工作负荷较低。在摩托车和行人冲突场景中,老年驾驶员表现出更高的视觉警觉性和注意力,而他们的驾驶反应和操作行为明显更为谨慎。此外,在左转场景中,驾驶员的视觉搜索和驾驶操作更为频繁。随着主观工作负荷的增加,老年驾驶员在冲突风险区域的平均注视时间和扫描强度显著增加,而垂直眼动和瞳孔直径呈下降趋势。同时,制动反应时间、平均速度、方向盘角度、横向加速度以及踏板开合度等指标均呈下降趋势。重要的是,分析表明,主观工作负荷评估中的自身表现、心理需求和身体需求这三个维度对老年驾驶员的危险感知性能有积极影响,其中自身表现的影响最大。相比之下,努力程度和受挫感的影响相对较小,时间需求的影响最小。
结果表明老年驾驶员的驾驶主观工作负荷与危险感知性能之间存在显著关联。考虑如何利用主观工作负荷评估来识别危险感知性能较差的驾驶员,并有可能帮助老年驾驶员提高驾驶安全性是可行的。