• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Factors influencing healthcare practitioners' decision to offer (or not) the choice of self-collection cervical screening in general practice in Victoria, Australia.

作者信息

Creagh Nicola S, Brotherton Julia ML, Hocking Jane S, Karahalios Amalia, Saville Marion, Smith Megan A, Canfell Karen, Hawkes David, Nightingale Claire

机构信息

BAdSc, MPH, Research Assistant, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic.

B Med (Hons), MPH (Hons), GradDipAppEpi, FAFPHM, PhD, GAICD, Medical Director, Registries and Research, Victorian Cytology Service; Honorary Principal Fellow, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Vic.

出版信息

Aust J Gen Pract. 2025 Jul;54(7):477-483. doi: 10.31128/AJGP-04-24-7229.

DOI:10.31128/AJGP-04-24-7229
PMID:40601982
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In July 2022, a policy change was enacted in the National Cervical Screening Program (NCSP) to allow all women and people with a cervix (hereafter people) the choice of a self-collected sample. This study aimed to understand healthcare practitioners' decisions, and factors related to, the provision (or not) of this change.

METHOD

Semi-structured interviews (n=28) were conducted between February and July 2023 with general practitioners, nurses and practice managers. The COM-B model of behaviour change framework informed the analysis.

RESULTS

Although most (n=22) interviewees reported that they, or healthcare practitioners at their practice, were providing a choice of self-collection to all, a minority (n=6) reported that either they (n=4) or their practice (n=2) were not. Factors that informed the selective provision of self-collection are reported.

DISCUSSION

For self-collection to facilitate improved equity in the NCSP, strategies are needed to reassure healthcare practitioners that self-collection is an appropriate screening modality, and ensure people are aware of their screening choices.

摘要

相似文献

1
Factors influencing healthcare practitioners' decision to offer (or not) the choice of self-collection cervical screening in general practice in Victoria, Australia.
Aust J Gen Pract. 2025 Jul;54(7):477-483. doi: 10.31128/AJGP-04-24-7229.
2
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.
3
Exponential uptake of HPV self-collected cervical screening testing 2 years since universal availability in Victoria, Australia.自澳大利亚维多利亚州全面推行人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)自我采集宫颈筛查检测两年以来,其接受率呈指数级增长。
BMC Med. 2025 Jul 1;23(1):389. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04219-3.
4
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
5
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5(10):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3.
6
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
7
The Utility of an Human Papillomavirus Genotype Assay for Cancer Screening in Self-Collected Urine and Vaginal Samples from Japanese Women.人乳头瘤病毒基因分型检测在日本女性自行采集的尿液和阴道样本癌症筛查中的效用
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2025;90(2):143-152. doi: 10.1159/000541641. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
8
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
9
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
10
Perceptions and experiences of the prevention, detection, and management of postpartum haemorrhage: a qualitative evidence synthesis.预防、检测和管理产后出血的认知和经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):CD013795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013795.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
'Why Didn't I Get That Choice?': A Qualitative Exploration of How Cervical Screening Choices Are Understood and Experienced by Screen-Eligible People in Australia, Two Years After Self-Collection Became an Option for All.“为何我没有那个选择?”:对澳大利亚符合筛查条件的人群如何理解和体验宫颈癌筛查选择的定性探索,自我采样成为所有人的选择两年后
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70397. doi: 10.1111/hex.70397.