Klostermann A, Debertshäuser T, Benary M, Biernath N, Erber B, Tahbaz R, Möbs M, Joosten M, Schmitt W D, Kim T, Jelas I, Chai L, Jegodka Y, Keller U, Beule D, Ochsenreither S, De Santis M, Schlomm T, Keilholz U, Knödler M, Rieke D T
Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
ESMO Open. 2025 Jul 1;10(7):105497. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105497.
Outcome is dismal in patients with advanced genitourinary (GU) cancers refractory to standard treatments. Molecular analyses and subsequent discussion of cases in specialized molecular tumor boards (MTBs) are increasingly incorporated into clinical management to facilitate personalized treatment. Data on this approach are lacking for GU malignancies.
We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with GU cancers discussed in the MTB at the Charité between 2016 and 2023. Ethics approval was obtained for prospective follow-up of patients after written informed consent and for retrospective data analysis. Clinical benefit was defined as complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) >6 months or a progression-free survival (PFS) ratio between molecularly matched therapy (MMT) and previous non-MMT >1.3. Outcome was assessed by the investigators.
Among 126 identified MTB patients, most patients had a rare tumor type (n = 59), followed by adenocarcinoma of the prostate (n = 45), urothelial carcinoma (n = 17) and clear-cell renal carcinoma (n = 5). Molecular profiling included immunohistochemistry (n = 80), panel sequencing (n = 110) and/or whole-exome/-transcriptome sequencing (n = 21). Eleven patients died before the final MTB discussion. At least one treatment option for MMT was identified for 78/115 patients (68%). Twenty-five patients were treated with an MMT (22%), three of whom subsequently received a second MMT. Eighteen MMTs were given in an off-label setting and two within clinical trials. A clinical benefit was observed in 8/28 (28.6%) applied MMTs. A PFS-ratio >1.3 was achieved in eight patients. Among patients with rare entities discussed (n = 54), 42 patients had at least one MMT option (78%), with 19 patients receiving at least one MMT (35%).
For a majority of GU cancer patients an MMT was identified and responses were seen in heavily pretreated patients. Additional controlled trials and integration of comprehensive molecular analyses and subsequent personalized therapy should be considered for patients with GU cancers, especially those with rare histologies.
对于对标准治疗难治的晚期泌尿生殖系统(GU)癌症患者,预后不佳。分子分析以及随后在专门的分子肿瘤委员会(MTB)中对病例的讨论越来越多地被纳入临床管理,以促进个性化治疗。目前缺乏关于GU恶性肿瘤这种治疗方法的数据。
我们对2016年至2023年在夏里特医院MTB中讨论的GU癌症患者进行了回顾性分析。在获得患者书面知情同意后,对患者进行前瞻性随访并进行回顾性数据分析,已获得伦理批准。临床获益定义为完全缓解(CR)、部分缓解(PR)或疾病稳定(SD)>6个月,或分子匹配治疗(MMT)与先前非MMT之间的无进展生存期(PFS)比率>1.3。结局由研究人员评估。
在126名确定的MTB患者中,大多数患者患有罕见肿瘤类型(n = 59),其次是前列腺腺癌(n = 45)、尿路上皮癌(n = 17)和透明细胞肾癌(n = 5)。分子谱分析包括免疫组织化学(n = 80)、基因panel测序(n = 110)和/或全外显子组/转录组测序(n = 21)。11名患者在最终MTB讨论前死亡。78/115名患者(68%)确定了至少一种MMT治疗方案。25名患者接受了MMT治疗(22%),其中3名患者随后接受了第二次MMT治疗。18次MMT治疗为超说明书用药,2次在临床试验中使用。在应用的28次MMT治疗中,8次(28.6%)观察到临床获益。8名患者实现了PFS比率>1.3。在讨论的罕见实体患者中(n = 54),42名患者有至少一种MMT治疗方案(78%),19名患者接受了至少一次MMT治疗(35%)。
对于大多数GU癌症患者,确定了MMT治疗方案,并且在经过大量预处理的患者中观察到了反应。对于GU癌症患者,尤其是那些组织学罕见的患者,应考虑进行额外的对照试验以及综合分子分析和后续个性化治疗的整合。