Torun Ömer, Aydın Erbil, Çevik Hüseyin Bilgehan
Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ministry of Health Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ministry of Health Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2025 Jun;57(3):201-210. doi: 10.1055/a-2549-7223. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
We hypothesised that the WALANT technique can be consistently replicated and does not demand a high level of skill, and it leads to a higher patient satisfaction rate, improved clinical outcomes, and shorter waiting times compared with an IC-BP block.Forty-eight patients with isolated closed DRF were randomly assigned to the WALANT or IC-BP group. Demographic data, fracture classification, suitability for surgery, preoperative pain scores, and waiting times were collected prospectively. Perioperative parameters, clinical outcomes (pain scores, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH] scores), complications, patient satisfaction (Visual Analogue Patient Satisfaction [VAPS] scale), and return to work were assessed.Patients in the WALANT group had significantly shorter waiting times for surgery and postoperative hospital stays than the IC-BP group. No significant difference was found in intraoperative blood loss. The WALANT group had lower pain scores at postoperative weeks 2, 6, and 12. DASH scores improved over time in both groups, with the WALANT group having a significantly lower mean score during the follow-up period. Patients in the WALANT group returned to work earlier, and patient satisfaction was significantly higher.Compared with IC-BP blockade, the WALANT technique offers several advantages in DRF surgery, including shorter waiting times, shorter postoperative hospital stays, lower pain scores, better functional outcomes, faster return to work, and higher patient satisfaction. The WALANT technique offers a safe and effective alternative that eliminates the need for general anaesthesia or tourniquet application. This technique is suitable for DRF surgery because it provides consistent results and does not require a high level of expertise. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these results and investigate long-term outcomes.
我们假设,与间歇性充气臂丛阻滞(IC-BP)相比,腕部局部麻醉下无止血带技术(WALANT)可以持续重复实施,且不需要高水平的技能,它能带来更高的患者满意度、改善临床结局并缩短等待时间。48例孤立性闭合性桡骨远端骨折(DRF)患者被随机分配至WALANT组或IC-BP组。前瞻性收集人口统计学数据、骨折分类、手术适宜性、术前疼痛评分和等待时间。评估围手术期参数、临床结局(疼痛评分、上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍[DASH]评分)、并发症、患者满意度(视觉模拟患者满意度[VAPS]量表)以及恢复工作情况。WALANT组患者的手术等待时间和术后住院时间明显短于IC-BP组。术中失血量无显著差异。WALANT组在术后第2周、第6周和第12周时疼痛评分较低。两组的DASH评分均随时间改善,WALANT组在随访期间的平均评分显著更低。WALANT组患者恢复工作更早,患者满意度显著更高。与IC-BP阻滞相比,WALANT技术在DRF手术中具有多项优势,包括等待时间更短、术后住院时间更短、疼痛评分更低、功能结局更好、恢复工作更快以及患者满意度更高。WALANT技术提供了一种安全有效的替代方案,无需全身麻醉或使用止血带。该技术适用于DRF手术,因为它能提供一致的结果,且不需要高水平的专业知识。需要进行更大样本量的进一步研究来证实这些结果并调查长期结局。