Suppr超能文献

使用铁基阳性T1造影剂(NEMO-103)的直接肩关节磁共振关节造影:与钆基造影剂的图像质量比较

Direct shoulder MR arthrography using an iron-based positive T1 contrast agent (NEMO-103): comparison of image quality with gadolinium-based contrast.

作者信息

Lee Hong Seon, Jang Chan Woong, Lee Young Han, Kim Sungjun, Park Jung Hyun

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Rehabilitation Institute of Neuromuscular Disease, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 211, Eonju-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):23317. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03438-1.

Abstract

The need for alternative MR contrast agents in direct shoulder MR arthrography (MRA) arises from limitations associated with gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs), which are deemed "off-label" for MRA and raise concerns about potential toxicity to joint tissue. This study aims to compare the image quality of NEMO-103 (codename)-based and GBCA-based direct shoulder MRA. A total of 89 MRAs from 81 patients were analyzed, with 39 NEMO-103-based MRAs from 31 patients and 50 GBCA-based MRAs from 50 patients. The MRAs were performed at 3.0-T using fast/turbo spin-echo T1- and T2-weighted images with or without fat suppression (spectral presaturation with inversion recovery). Participants included individuals undergoing MRA for suspected or diagnosed shoulder pathologies between August 2021 and September 2022. Quantitative assessments (contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR] and distension measurements) and qualitative evaluations (distension, sharpness, contrast, and overall image quality scores) were conducted by three musculoskeletal radiologists. A visual Turing test (VTT) was used to assess the ability of 39 clinicians to differentiate between the two contrast agents. Statistical tests included the Shapiro-Wilk test, independent t-tests, and chi-squared test. The study compared 31 NEMO-103-based MRAs (11 females [35.5%], age: 40.0 ± 13.0 years) and 38 GBCA-based MRAs (14 females [36.8%], age: 49.4 ± 18.7 years) within 30 min post-injection, and 8 NEMO-103-based MRAs (3 females [37.5%], age: 38.0 ± 7.8 years) versus 12 GBCA-based MRAs (5 females [41.7%], age: 56.2 ± 15.7 years) in the 30-60-min post-injection timeframe. NEMO-103-based MRAs demonstrated superior axillary pouch distension and overall image quality in both comparisons. CNR was notably higher with NEMO-103. The VTT showed a 53.3% accuracy in differentiating NEMO-103 from GBCA, similar to random guessing. NEMO-103 may serve as a potential alternative to GBCAs for direct shoulder MRA, offering comparable or superior image quality with potentially fewer concerns related to gadolinium-associated toxicity.

摘要

直接肩关节磁共振关节造影(MRA)中对替代磁共振对比剂的需求源于与钆基对比剂(GBCA)相关的局限性,GBCA被认为在MRA中属于“超适应症使用”,并引发了对其对关节组织潜在毒性的担忧。本研究旨在比较基于NEMO - 103(代号)的和基于GBCA的直接肩关节MRA的图像质量。共分析了来自81例患者的89次MRA,其中31例患者的39次基于NEMO - 103的MRA和50例患者的50次基于GBCA的MRA。MRA在3.0-T下使用快速/涡轮自旋回波T1加权和T2加权图像进行,有或没有脂肪抑制(频谱预饱和反转恢复)。参与者包括在2021年8月至2022年9月期间因疑似或确诊的肩部病变而接受MRA的个体。由三位肌肉骨骼放射科医生进行定量评估(对比噪声比[CNR]和扩张测量)和定性评估(扩张、清晰度、对比度和整体图像质量评分)。使用视觉图灵测试(VTT)评估39名临床医生区分两种对比剂的能力。统计测试包括夏皮罗-威尔克检验、独立t检验和卡方检验。该研究比较了注射后30分钟内31次基于NEMO - 103的MRA(11名女性[35.5%],年龄:40.0±13.0岁)和38次基于GBCA的MRA(14名女性[36.8%],年龄:49.4±18.7岁),以及注射后30 - 60分钟内8次基于NEMO - 103的MRA(3名女性[37.5%],年龄:38.0±7.8岁)与12次基于GBCA的MRA(5名女性[41.7%],年龄:56.2±15.7岁)。在两次比较中,基于NEMO - 103的MRA均显示出 superior腋窝囊扩张和整体图像质量。NEMO - 103的CNR明显更高。VTT显示区分NEMO - 103和GBCA的准确率为53.3%,与随机猜测相似。对于直接肩关节MRA,NEMO - 103可能作为GBCA的潜在替代品,提供相当或 superior的图像质量,且与钆相关毒性相关的担忧可能更少。 (注:原文中superior未翻译完整,推测可能是“更好的”之类意思,需结合完整医学知识准确理解)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验