Suppr超能文献

一项关于使用新开发的缝线进行超声引导下非切开扳机指松解术的尸体研究。

A cadaveric study of ultrasound guided nonincisional trigger finger release with newly developed threads.

作者信息

Nam Kyung Eun, Kim In Jong, Park Hae-Yeon, Kim Sang Hyun, Lee U-Young, Kim Jae Min

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Howareyou Rehabilitation Clinic, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):23532. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08847-w.

Abstract

This study investigated the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided non-incisional thread trigger finger release on cadavers using a newly developed domestic thread (Smartwire-01). Ultrasound-guided non-incisional thread trigger finger release was performed on 12 fresh cadaveric hands, including 12 thumbs and 48 long fingers. Two experts, experienced in an ultrasound-guided thread transecting technique, performed the procedures independently. The distal-to-proximal and proximal-to-distal approaches were performed in 6 hands each to determine which is safer and more effective. After the procedure, anatomical analyses were conducted by a blinded anatomist. The presence of a dissected A1 pulley and any damage to adjacent structures were assessed. Among the 60 cadaveric digits, 52 (86.7%) showed complete transection of the A1 pulley. The success rate for the thumb (66.7%) was relatively lower than that of the other fingers (91.7%). The distal-to-proximal approach showed a higher success rate (96.7%) compared to the proximal-to-distal approach (76.7%), with a near-significant difference (p = 0.052). Anatomical analysis revealed clear and sharp incisional margins of the transected A1 pulley, with only 1 minor flexor tendon injury observed, which occurred with the proximal-to-distal approach. Ultrasound-guided non-incisional thread trigger finger release using Smartwire-01 is a safe and effective procedure when performed with the distal-to-proximal approach, particularly in long fingers.

摘要

本研究使用新研发的国产缝线(Smartwire-01),在尸体上探究超声引导下非切开缝线松解扳机指的有效性和安全性。对12只新鲜尸体手进行超声引导下非切开缝线松解扳机指操作,包括12个拇指和48个示指。两名精通超声引导下缝线切断技术的专家独立进行操作。分别对6只手采用从远到近和从近到远的入路,以确定哪种入路更安全、更有效。术后,由一位不知情的解剖学家进行解剖分析。评估A1滑车切断情况以及对相邻结构的任何损伤。在60个尸体手指中,52个(86.7%)显示A1滑车完全切断。拇指的成功率(66.7%)相对低于其他手指(91.7%)。从远到近入路的成功率(96.7%)高于从近到远入路(76.7%),差异接近显著(p = 0.052)。解剖分析显示,切断的A1滑车切口边缘清晰、锐利,仅观察到1例轻微的屈肌腱损伤,发生在从近到远入路时。使用Smartwire-01进行超声引导下非切开缝线松解扳机指,采用从远到近入路时是一种安全有效的操作,尤其是在示指。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验