Suppr超能文献

简易痴呆评定系统中文版(QDRS)的信效度分析

Reliability and validity analysis of the Chinese version of the Quick Dementia Rating System (QDRS).

作者信息

Su Hang, Zhu Jiehua, Wang Yifan, Jin Jun, Guo Qihao

机构信息

Department of Gerontology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China.

Department of Emergency, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):455. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06112-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is one of the most common chronic diseases among the elderly. The Quick Dementia Rating System (QDRS) is a recognized cognitive assessment tool. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the Chinese version of the QDRS (C-QDRS) as an early screening tool for elderly individuals.

METHODS

The QDRS was translated into Chinese and its reliability and validity were assessed. A total of 366 people were recruited for the study, and all participants completed comprehensive neuropsychological tests. For reliability analysis, internal consistency was calculated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. For validity analysis, the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were carried out. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to evaluate the discriminative ability of the C-QDRS to identify cognitive impairment.

RESULTS

C-QDRS scores increased progressively across groups: normal controls, objective subtle cognitive decline (obj-SCD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and AD. The C-QDRS demonstrated strong consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.923. The EFA showed a two-factor structure, and the CFA indicated that the model fit was satisfactory (χ/df = 2.81, P < 0.001). There were strong correlations between the C-QDRS and standardized neuropsychological tests, indicating that the C-QDRS exhibited concurrent validity (all P < 0.001). ROC analyses showed optimal cutoff values of 1.0 for obj-SCD, 2.5 for MCI, and 5.0 for AD, with AUCs of 0.802, 0.840, and 0.907, respectively. The C-QDRS showed statistically superior discriminative ability compared to ACE-III and MoCA-B in detecting obj-SCD (both P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The C-QDRS is a precise and effective tool for screening both AD and preclinical AD in China.

摘要

背景

阿尔茨海默病(AD)是老年人中最常见的慢性疾病之一。快速痴呆评定系统(QDRS)是一种公认的认知评估工具。本研究的目的是评估中文版QDRS(C-QDRS)作为老年人早期筛查工具的效果。

方法

将QDRS翻译成中文,并评估其信效度。共招募366人参与本研究,所有参与者均完成了全面的神经心理学测试。进行信度分析时,使用Cronbach's α系数计算内部一致性。进行效度分析时,开展了探索性因素分析(EFA)和验证性因素分析(CFA)。进行了受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析,以评估C-QDRS识别认知障碍的判别能力。

结果

C-QDRS得分在各组中逐渐升高:正常对照组、客观轻微认知功能下降(obj-SCD)、轻度认知障碍(MCI)和AD组。C-QDRS表现出很强的一致性,Cronbach's α为0.923。EFA显示为双因素结构,CFA表明模型拟合良好(χ/df = 2.81,P < 0.001)。C-QDRS与标准化神经心理学测试之间存在很强的相关性,表明C-QDRS具有同时效度(所有P < 0.001)。ROC分析显示,obj-SCD的最佳截断值为1.0,MCI为2.5,AD为5.0,曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.802、0.840和0.907。在检测obj-SCD方面,C-QDRS的判别能力在统计学上优于ACE-III和MoCA-B(P均< 0.05)。

结论

C-QDRS是在中国筛查AD和临床前AD的精确有效工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验