• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同吸入疗法治疗具有哮喘样特征的慢性阻塞性肺疾病的临床结局比较:前瞻性RealDTC队列的一项真实世界研究

Comparison of clinical outcome of COPD with asthma-like feature with different inhalation therapies: a real-world study in the prospective RealDTC cohort.

作者信息

Lin Ling, Cheng Wei, Song Qing, Li Tao, Liu Cong, Zhang Ping, Zeng Yuqin, Deng Dingding, Yu Zhiping, Chen Yan, Chen Ping

机构信息

Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Renmin Middle Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.

Research Unit of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.

出版信息

BMC Pulm Med. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12890-025-03767-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12890-025-03767-x
PMID:40604630
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many studies explored the features of Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with asthma-like features. We aimed to compare the exacerbation and mortality during one-year follow-up among COPD patients with asthma-like features with different inhalation therapies in the Chinese population (compare Without-inhaled corticosteroids(ICS)and With-ICS inhalation therapy, and then ICS + long-acting β-2-agonist(LABA) and ICS + LABA + long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA).

METHODS

This real-world observational study was conducted in the RealDTC cohort (ChiCTR-POC-17010431, Trial Regisrtation Date: 2017.01.14). COPD patients with asthma-like features in China from July 1, 2017, to June 31 2022 were recruited into the study and followed-up for 12 months. The Without-ICS inhalation therapy cohort included patients with LAMA or LABA + LAMA therapy, the With-ICS inhalation therapy cohort included patients with ICS + LABA or ICS + LABA + LAMA therapy.

RESULTS

Of the 2735 eligible participants, the With-ICS inhalation therapy cohort was less likely to experience moderate-to-severe exacerbation and severe exacerbation during follow-up than the Without-ICS inhalation therapy cohort after PSM in multivariate analysis, but not death. The ICS + LABA + LAMA group had a lower risk of moderate-to-severe and frequent exacerbations than the ICS + LABA group after PSM. In addition, patients with CAT ≥ 10, or with previous exacerbation history, or with GOLD II and GOLD III + IV grade, receiving ICS + LABA + LAMA had a decreased risk of exacerbation compared to ICS + LABA.

CONCLUSIONS

COPD patients with asthma-like features with With-ICS inhalation therapy based on bronchodilators were less likely to experience future exacerbations than those Without-ICS inhalation therapy, but not death. In addition, ICS + LABA + LAMA therapy decreased the risk of exacerbation compared to ICS + LABA therapy during follow-up, especially in patients with CAT ≥ 10, or with previous exacerbation history, or with GOLD II and GOLD III + IV grade.

摘要

背景

许多研究探讨了具有哮喘样特征的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的特点。我们旨在比较中国人群中接受不同吸入疗法的具有哮喘样特征的COPD患者在一年随访期间的急性加重情况和死亡率(比较不使用吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)和使用ICS吸入疗法,然后比较ICS联合长效β2受体激动剂(LABA)和ICS联合LABA加长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA))。

方法

这项真实世界观察性研究在RealDTC队列中进行(ChiCTR-POC-17010431,试验注册日期:2017年1月14日)。纳入2017年7月1日至2022年6月31日在中国的具有哮喘样特征的COPD患者并进行12个月的随访。不使用ICS吸入疗法队列包括接受LAMA或LABA+LAMA治疗的患者,使用ICS吸入疗法队列包括接受ICS+LABA或ICS+LABA+LAMA治疗的患者。

结果

在2735名符合条件的参与者中,多因素分析中倾向得分匹配(PSM)后,使用ICS吸入疗法队列在随访期间发生中重度急性加重和重度急性加重的可能性低于不使用ICS吸入疗法队列,但在死亡率方面无差异。PSM后,ICS+LABA+LAMA组发生中重度和频繁急性加重的风险低于ICS+LABA组。此外,与ICS+LABA相比,CAT≥10或有既往急性加重史或GOLD II级和GOLD III+IV级的患者接受ICS+LABA+LAMA治疗后急性加重风险降低。

结论

基于支气管扩张剂使用ICS吸入疗法的具有哮喘样特征的COPD患者未来发生急性加重的可能性低于不使用ICS吸入疗法的患者,但在死亡率方面无差异。此外,与ICS+LABA疗法相比,随访期间ICS+LABA+LAMA疗法降低了急性加重风险,尤其是在CAT≥10或有既往急性加重史或GOLD II级和GOLD III+IV级的患者中。

相似文献

1
Comparison of clinical outcome of COPD with asthma-like feature with different inhalation therapies: a real-world study in the prospective RealDTC cohort.不同吸入疗法治疗具有哮喘样特征的慢性阻塞性肺疾病的临床结局比较:前瞻性RealDTC队列的一项真实世界研究
BMC Pulm Med. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12890-025-03767-x.
2
Long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) plus long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) versus LABA plus inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA)联合长效β受体激动剂(LABA)与LABA联合吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)用于稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 10;2(2):CD012066. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012066.pub2.
3
Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) added to combination long-acting beta2-agonists and inhaled corticosteroids (LABA/ICS) versus LABA/ICS for adults with asthma.长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA)联合长效β2受体激动剂和吸入性糖皮质激素(LABA/ICS)与LABA/ICS用于成人哮喘患者的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 21;2016(1):CD011721. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011721.pub2.
4
Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) added to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) versus addition of long-acting beta2-agonists (LABA) for adults with asthma.对于成年哮喘患者,长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA)联合吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)与联合长效β2受体激动剂(LABA)的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 2;2015(6):CD011438. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011438.pub2.
5
Inhaled corticosteroids with combination inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists and long-acting muscarinic antagonists for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.吸入性皮质类固醇联合吸入长效β2-激动剂和长效抗胆碱能药物治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Dec 6;12(12):CD011600. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011600.pub3.
6
Long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) plus long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) versus LABA plus inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA)联合长效β-激动剂(LABA)与 LABA 联合吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)治疗稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 5;6(6):CD012066. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012066.pub3.
7
Once-daily long-acting beta₂-agonists/inhaled corticosteroids combined inhalers versus inhaled long-acting muscarinic antagonists for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.对于慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者,每日一次长效β₂受体激动剂/吸入性糖皮质激素联合吸入器与吸入性长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 24;8(8):CD012355. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012355.pub2.
8
Long-acting inhaled therapy (beta-agonists, anticholinergics and steroids) for COPD: a network meta-analysis.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的长效吸入疗法(β受体激动剂、抗胆碱能药物和类固醇):一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 26;2014(3):CD010844. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010844.pub2.
9
Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) added to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) versus the same dose of ICS alone for adults with asthma.长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA)与吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)联合使用,对比单独使用相同剂量ICS用于成人哮喘患者的疗效。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 24;2015(8):CD011397. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011397.pub2.
10
Efficacy of Budesonide/Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate Metered Dose Inhaler (BGF MDI) Versus Other Inhaled Corticosteroid/Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist/Long-Acting β-Agonist (ICS/LAMA/LABA) Triple Combinations in COPD: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis.布地奈德/格隆溴铵/富马酸福莫特罗干粉吸入剂(BGF MDI)对比其他吸入性皮质类固醇/长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂/长效β激动剂(ICS/LAMA/LABA)三联复方制剂治疗 COPD 的疗效:系统文献评价和网络荟萃分析。
Adv Ther. 2020 Jun;37(6):2956-2975. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01311-3. Epub 2020 Apr 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical characteristics and risk of all-cause mortality in low education patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the Chinese population.中文人群中受教育程度低的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的临床特征及全因死亡率风险。
J Glob Health. 2023 Dec 1;13:04163. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04163.
2
Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2023 Report: GOLD Executive Summary.全球慢性阻塞性肺疾病倡议 2023 年报告:GOLD 执行摘要。
Eur Respir J. 2023 Apr 1;61(4). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00239-2023. Print 2023 Apr.
3
Definition and Nomenclature of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Time for Its Revision.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病的定义与命名:是时候修订了。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Dec 1;206(11):1317-1325. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202204-0671PP.
4
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With Asthma-Like Features in the General Population in China.中国普通人群中具有哮喘样特征的慢性阻塞性肺疾病
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 May 6;9:876240. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.876240. eCollection 2022.
5
Adherence and persistence to once-daily single-inhaler versus multiple-inhaler triple therapy among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the USA: A real-world study.美国慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者对每日一次单吸入器与多吸入器三联疗法的依从性和持续性:一项真实世界研究。
Respir Med. 2022 Jun;197:106807. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2022.106807. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
6
Persistent overweight or obesity, lung function, and asthma exacerbations in Puerto Rican youth.波多黎各青少年持续超重或肥胖、肺功能和哮喘恶化。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2022 Apr;128(4):408-413.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2022.01.004. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
7
Racial Differences in Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of Asthma-Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Overlap.哮喘-慢性阻塞性肺疾病重叠综合征患病率及临床特征的种族差异
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 22;8:780438. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.780438. eCollection 2021.
8
Initial maintenance therapy adherence among older adults with asthma-COPD overlap.老年哮喘-COPD 重叠患者的初始维持治疗依从性。
Am J Manag Care. 2021 Nov;27(11):463-470. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88773.
9
A Randomized, Noninferiority Trial Comparing ICS + LABA with ICS + LABA + LAMA in Asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO) Treatment: The ACO Treatment with Optimal Medications (ATOMIC) Study.一项比较 ICS+LABA 与 ICS+LABA+LAMA 在哮喘-COPD 重叠(ACO)治疗中的随机、非劣效性试验:最佳药物治疗 ACO(ATOMIC)研究。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Mar;9(3):1304-1311.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.09.066. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
10
Identification and definition of asthma-COPD overlap: The CanCOLD study.哮喘-慢性阻塞性肺疾病重叠的识别与定义:加拿大慢性阻塞性肺疾病队列研究
Respirology. 2020 Aug;25(8):836-849. doi: 10.1111/resp.13780. Epub 2020 Feb 16.