Erbay Müge, Ayçiçek Olcay, Hocek Aleyna Bektaş, Özdemir Kübra Nur
Section of Immunology and Allergy Diseases, Department of Chest Diseases, Medical Faculty, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.
Department of Chest Diseases, Medical Faculty, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.
BMC Pulm Med. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s12890-025-03764-0.
An accurate distinction between asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and asthma-COPD overlap (ACO) in patients with fixed airflow obstruction (FAO) is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies and improving clinical outcomes. The role of bronchodilator response in differentiating between these diseases is unclear. We aimed to identify factors that could aid in differential diagnosis.
This study employed a single-center, retrospective cohort design at a tertiary referral hospital. Patients with fixed airway obstruction, characterized by a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio < 0.7 or below the lower limit of normal spirometry, were included. Receiver operating curve analysis (ROC) was used to evaluate the optimal cutoff values for spirometric data, with the goal of differentiating between ACO patients and those with asthma or COPD. Univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression models were employed to identify the demographic and clinical characteristics associated with ACO.
Of 301 patients, 41.2% had asthma, 43.9% had COPD, and 15% had ACO. Of the participants 66.4% were male, and the mean age was 61.2 ± 14.3 years. The bronchodilator response (BDR) was significantly higher in the ACO group (280 mL) than in the asthma (190 mL) and COPD (120 mL) groups (p < 0.001). BDR (%) was associated with ACO in both univariate (OR 1.056; 95% CI 1.028-1.084; p < 0.001) and multivariate analyses (OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.01-1.09; p = 0.01). The BDR (ml) had the highest AUC (0.702; p < 0.001), suggesting that it is a moderately predictive diagnostic parameter with a cutoff of ≥ 280 ml (sensitivity: 55.56%; specificity: 77.73%). FEV1 (L) and FEV1/FVC (%) also demonstrated moderate diagnostic values with AUCs of 0.625 and 0.594, respectively.
This study provides practical cutoff values for BDR, aiding clinicians in distinguishing between overlapping respiratory diseases in a tertiary care settings. An identified BDR cutoff of ≥ 280 mL could serve as a practical tool for distinguishing ACO.
对于存在固定气流受限(FAO)的患者,准确区分哮喘、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和哮喘-COPD重叠综合征(ACO)对于优化治疗策略和改善临床结局至关重要。支气管扩张剂反应在区分这些疾病中的作用尚不清楚。我们旨在确定有助于鉴别诊断的因素。
本研究采用一家三级转诊医院的单中心回顾性队列设计。纳入以支气管扩张剂后FEV1/FVC比值<0.7或低于正常肺量计下限为特征的固定气道阻塞患者。采用受试者工作特征曲线分析(ROC)评估肺量计数据的最佳截断值,目的是区分ACO患者与哮喘或COPD患者。采用单变量和多变量二元逻辑回归模型确定与ACO相关的人口统计学和临床特征。
301例患者中,41.2%患有哮喘,43.9%患有COPD,15%患有ACO。参与者中66.4%为男性,平均年龄为61.2±14.3岁。ACO组的支气管扩张剂反应(BDR)(280 ml)显著高于哮喘组(190 ml)和COPD组(120 ml)(p<0.001)。单变量分析(OR 1.056;95%CI 1.028-1.084;p<0.001)和多变量分析(OR