Suppr超能文献

[用于对比久坐不动生活方式的操场标记:系统文献综述]

[Playground marking for contrasting sedentary lifestyle: systematic literature review].

作者信息

Cruciani Fabio, Mitrova Zuzana, Brigoni Patrizia, Kalemi Thellenxa, Masini Alice, Saulle Rosella

机构信息

Dipartimento di Epidemiologia del Servizio Sanitario Regionale del Lazio, ASL Roma 1, Roma.

Network Italiano Evidence Based Prevention (NIEBP).

出版信息

Epidemiol Prev. 2025 Mar-Jun;49(2-3):200-207. doi: 10.19191/EP25.2-3.A838.028.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

promoting physical activity and reducing sedentary behaviour are public health priorities aimed at ensuring health and well-being at all stages of life. Physical activity should be encouraged from early childhood, with play being a key component, including interactive 'floor-based' activities in safe spaces. The introduction of colourful markings in playgrounds and public spaces (such as 'playground markings') may offer a cost-effective and feasible way to promote physical activity, also providing structured opportunities for teachers to support motor skill development.

OBJECTIVES

to provide evidence of the benefits of playground markings interventions in schools on increasing physical activity levels and enhancing the physical and psychological well-being in pre-school and school-aged children.

DESIGN

a systematic literature search was conducted in Cochrane Library, MedLine, Embase, PsycInfo, and Epistemonikos databases up to 13.02.2024. The primary focus was to identify systematic reviews (SRs) or, in their absence, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized controlled trials (NRCTs). Study quality was assessed using validated tools according to study design, and meta-analyses were conducted where feasible. The GRADE approach was used to evaluate the certainty of evidence and results were presented in Summary of Findings (SoF) tables. Studies not included in the meta-analyses due to data unavailability or heterogeneity in outcome measures or interventions were narratively reported.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

students aged 3 to 10 years attending preschool and primary school.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

increased physical activity (including light, moderate vigorous and reduction of sedentary lifestyle); reduced obesity, overweight, Body Mass Index; well-being (quality of life, psychological aspect); cognitive level; school performance.

RESULTS

a total of 557 records were screened and 35 potentially eligible full-text assessed publications. The review included 14 publications corresponding to 11 studies: 6 RCTs and 5 NRCTs. No systematic reviews were included. Meta-analyses were conducted using data from 2 RCTs, examining outcomes related to reduced sedentary behaviour and increased light, moderate, and vigorous physical activity. No statistically significant differences between comparison groups. The certainty of evidence was very low for all outcomes. Four of the 9 studies that were not included in the meta-analysis were RCT studies and 5 non-randomized studies reported heterogeneous results with respect to the physical activity outcome with some outcomes showing an effect in favour of the intervention while others reported no effect.

CONCLUSIONS

multi-coloured playground markings consist of a low-cost approach to promote physical activity in children. However, the results reported by the few available studies in both pre-school and school-age children are inconclusive.

摘要

背景

促进身体活动和减少久坐行为是公共卫生的重点,旨在确保生命各阶段的健康和福祉。应从幼儿期就鼓励身体活动,玩耍是关键组成部分,包括在安全空间进行互动式“地面”活动。在操场和公共场所引入彩色标记(如“操场标记”)可能是一种经济有效的促进身体活动的方式,也为教师提供了支持运动技能发展的结构化机会。

目的

提供证据证明学校操场标记干预措施在增加学龄前和学龄儿童身体活动水平以及促进其身心健康方面的益处。

设计

截至2024年2月13日,在Cochrane图书馆、Medline、Embase、PsycInfo和Epistemonikos数据库中进行了系统的文献检索。主要重点是识别系统评价(SR),若没有则识别随机对照试验(RCT)和非随机对照试验(NRCT)。根据研究设计使用经过验证的工具评估研究质量,并在可行的情况下进行荟萃分析。采用GRADE方法评估证据的确定性,并在结果总结(SoF)表中呈现结果。由于数据不可用、结果测量或干预措施存在异质性而未纳入荟萃分析的研究进行叙述性报告。

背景和参与者

3至10岁的学龄前和小学学生。

主要结局指标

增加身体活动(包括轻度、中度、剧烈活动以及减少久坐生活方式);降低肥胖、超重、体重指数;幸福感(生活质量、心理方面);认知水平;学业成绩。

结果

共筛选了557条记录,对35篇可能符合条件的全文评估出版物进行了评估。该综述纳入了14篇出版物,对应11项研究:6项RCT和5项NRCT。未纳入系统评价。使用2项RCT的数据进行荟萃分析,检查与减少久坐行为以及增加轻度、中度和剧烈身体活动相关的结果。比较组之间无统计学显著差异。所有结局的证据确定性都非常低。未纳入荟萃分析的9项研究中有4项是RCT研究,5项非随机研究报告了关于身体活动结果的异质性结果,一些结果显示干预措施有效果,而另一些则报告无效果。

结论

彩色操场标记是促进儿童身体活动的低成本方法。然而,现有少数针对学龄前和学龄儿童的研究报告的结果尚无定论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验