Suppr超能文献

非对称放大:解读中国电子烟政策对青少年影响的新视角

Asymmetric amplification: New lens for China's e-cigarette policies on youth influence.

作者信息

Wang Quan, Qin Yixin, Song Yingming, Lv Yumeng, Jiang Yuan, Yang Li

机构信息

School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Glob Health Med. 2025 Jun 30;7(3):185-188. doi: 10.35772/ghm.2025.01049.

Abstract

China introduced universal e-cigarette regulations in 2018 to curb youth vaping, including flavor bans, online sales prohibitions, and taxation. While these policies are not explicitly age-targeted, their design disproportionately impacts adolescents due to young people's price sensitivity, preference for flavored products, and reliance on online purchases. This study examines how such regulations achieve outcomes akin to age-based bans without directly restricting moral agency or risking discrimination. We believe that universal measures like flavor restrictions and taxes amplify their impact on youth through behavioral and economic mechanisms - termed "asymmetric amplification". Results suggest these policies effectively reduce youth vaping while sidestepping ethical controversies tied to generational bans. However, challenges like informal sales channels and adolescent stigma require complementary enforcement. This paper highlights a pragmatic and ethically sound approach to youth tobacco control and offers new insights into policy design for public health practitioners and regulators worldwide.

摘要

中国于2018年出台了通用电子烟法规,以遏制青少年吸电子烟的行为,包括口味禁令、禁止网上销售和征税。虽然这些政策没有明确以年龄为目标,但由于年轻人对价格敏感、偏爱调味产品以及依赖网购,其设计对青少年的影响尤为严重。本研究探讨了此类法规如何在不直接限制道德行为能力或不冒歧视风险的情况下,实现类似于基于年龄的禁令的效果。我们认为,口味限制和税收等通用措施通过行为和经济机制——称为“不对称放大”——增强了它们对青少年的影响。结果表明,这些政策有效地减少了青少年吸电子烟的行为,同时避免了与代际禁令相关的伦理争议。然而,非正式销售渠道和青少年污名化等挑战需要配套的执法措施。本文强调了一种务实且符合伦理的青少年烟草控制方法,并为全球公共卫生从业者和监管机构的政策设计提供了新的见解。

相似文献

1
Asymmetric amplification: New lens for China's e-cigarette policies on youth influence.
Glob Health Med. 2025 Jun 30;7(3):185-188. doi: 10.35772/ghm.2025.01049.
2
Impact of institutional smoking bans on reducing harms and secondhand smoke exposure.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 27;2016(5):CD011856. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011856.pub2.
4
Beyond excise taxes: a systematic review of literature on non-tax policy approaches to raising tobacco product prices.
Tob Control. 2016 Jul;25(4):377-85. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052294. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
5
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
Youth Initiation of Cannabis Vaping is Associated With State Cannabis Policy and E-Cigarette Use.
J Adolesc Health. 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2025.03.016.
8
E-Cigarette Narratives of User-Generated Posts on Xiaohongshu in China: Content Analysis.
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 3;27:e71173. doi: 10.2196/71173.
9
Do-It-Yourself Flavored Capsule Cigarettes: Exploiting Potential Regulatory Loopholes?
Nicotine Tob Res. 2025 May 22;27(6):1142-1146. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae258.
10
Effects of tobacco taxation and pricing on smoking behavior in high risk populations: a knowledge synthesis.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 Nov;8(11):4118-39. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8114118. Epub 2011 Oct 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Rethinking selective prohibitions: the inconsistency of a generational smoking ban in a permissive society.
J Med Ethics. 2025 Apr 24;51(5):jme-2024-110577. doi: 10.1136/jme-2024-110577.
2
(Un)equal treatment in the 'tobacco-free generation'.
J Med Ethics. 2025 Apr 24;51(5):jme-2024-110209. doi: 10.1136/jme-2024-110209.
4
Tobacco Product Use Among U.S. Middle and High School Students - National Youth Tobacco Survey, 2023.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2023 Nov 3;72(44):1173-1182. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7244a1.
6
Intended and unintended effects of e-cigarette taxes on youth tobacco use.
J Health Econ. 2023 Jan;87:102720. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2022.102720. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
7
E-Cigarette Use and Regulation: A Comparative Analysis between the United States, the UK, and China.
Am J Bioeth. 2022 Oct;22(10):29-31. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2110971.
8
Vaping control in Nova Scotia: using research to catalyze change.
Can J Public Health. 2022 Jun;113(3):417-421. doi: 10.17269/s41997-022-00620-0. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
10
See you in court: obstacles to enforcing the ban on electronic cigarette flavours and marketing in Finland.
Tob Control. 2020 Dec;29(e1):e175-e180. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055260. Epub 2019 Oct 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验