• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗癫痫药物使用者发生高氨血症性脑病的驱动因素是什么:单药治疗风险还是联合用药风险?

What drives hyperammonemic encephalopathy in AED users: monotherapy risks or polypharmacy perils?

作者信息

Shan Qing, Wang Lei, Liu Xia, Chen Yan, Li Bing, Guo Yuhang, Fu Qiang, Guo Jinmin

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, The 960 Hospital, Jinan, Shandong, China.

Jinan Key Laboratory of Individualised Clinical Drug Safety Monitoring and Pharmacovigilance Research, Jinan, China.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jun 18;16:1477127. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1477127. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fphar.2025.1477127
PMID:40606599
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12213827/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Hyperammonemic encephalopathy (HE) is a serious side effect linked to sodium valproate (VPA). Recent case studies indicate that newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) might also trigger HE, whether used alone or alongside VPA. This study investigated the risk factors of HE linked to 10 AEDs using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), focusing on VPA co-administration effects.

METHODS

FAERS reports from the first quarter of 2013 to the third quarter of 2024 were examined for ten frequently prescribed antiepileptic drugs (AEDs): VPA, perampanel (PER), phenytoin (PHT), carbamazepine (CBZ), topiramate (TPM), lamotrigine (LTG), levetiracetam (LEV), oxcarbazepine (OXA), clonazepam (CZP), and zonisamide (ZNS). Hepatic event (HE) signals were evaluated using reporting odds ratios (ROR). A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess risk factors (age, gender, indication, drug combinations). Particular attention was given to the effects of VPA in combination with LEV, TPM, olanzapine (OLZ), or quetiapine (QTP) on the risk of HE.

RESULTS

A total of 1,456 HE-related events were identified, with 93.06% of these events linked to AEDs. VPA had the highest association with HE (ROR = 122.14, 95% CI: 110.16-135.41), followed by PER, which was independent of VPA (ROR = 52.62). Eight additional AEDs also indicated positive associations, mainly influenced by VPA (such as TPM and LEV). Identified risk factors for HE included age (with a lower risk observed in minors, OR = 0.61, 95% CI [0.50-0.76]) and clinical indication (with a lower risk in psychiatric disorders, OR = 0.74, 95% CI [0.62-0.89]). The combination of VPA+TPM significantly raised the risk of HE (OR = 3.38, 95% CI [2.25-5.06]) without negatively impacting outcomes. Furthermore, combinations of antipsychotic medications with VPA also indicated an increased risk of HE (OLZ+VPA: OR = 1.65, 95% CI [1.18-2.30], QTP+VPA: OR = 1.95, 95% CI [1.39-2.75]).

CONCLUSION

This research underscores the possible danger of HE related to AEDs, with a particular focus on the risks tied to VPA and PER when used alone, as well as VPA in conjunction with TPM, OLZ, or QTP. It emphasizes the need to monitor ammonia levels in patients on AEDs, particularly those on polypharmacy.

摘要

背景与目的

高氨血症性脑病(HE)是与丙戊酸钠(VPA)相关的一种严重副作用。近期的病例研究表明,新型抗癫痫药物(AEDs)单独使用或与VPA联合使用时,也可能引发HE。本研究利用美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的数据,调查了与10种AEDs相关的HE的危险因素,重点关注VPA联合用药的影响。

方法

对2013年第一季度至2024年第三季度FAERS报告中的十种常用抗癫痫药物(AEDs)进行了审查:VPA、吡仑帕奈(PER)、苯妥英(PHT)、卡马西平(CBZ)、托吡酯(TPM)、拉莫三嗪(LTG)、左乙拉西坦(LEV)、奥卡西平(OXA)、氯硝西泮(CZP)和唑尼沙胺(ZNS)。使用报告比值比(ROR)评估肝脏事件(HE)信号。进行多因素逻辑回归分析以评估危险因素(年龄、性别、适应症、药物组合)。特别关注VPA与LEV、TPM、奥氮平(OLZ)或喹硫平(QTP)联合使用对HE风险的影响。

结果

共识别出1456起与HE相关的事件,其中93.06%的事件与AEDs有关。VPA与HE的关联度最高(ROR = 122.14,95%CI:110.16 - 135.41),其次是PER,其与VPA无关(ROR = 52.62)。另外八种AEDs也显示出正相关,主要受VPA影响(如TPM和LEV)。确定的HE危险因素包括年龄(未成年人风险较低, OR = 0.61, 95%CI [0.50 - 0.76])和临床适应症(精神疾病风险较低, OR = 0.74, 95%CI [0.62 - 0.89])。VPA + TPM联合使用显著增加了HE的风险(OR = 3.38, 95%CI [2.25 - 5.06]),且未对治疗结果产生负面影响。此外,抗精神病药物与VPA联合使用也显示出HE风险增加(OLZ + VPA: OR = 1.65, 95%CI [1.18 - 2.30], QTP + VPA: OR = 1.95, 95%CI [1.39 - 2.75])。

结论

本研究强调了与AEDs相关的HE的潜在危险,尤其关注单独使用VPA和PER以及VPA与TPM、OLZ或QTP联合使用时的风险。它强调了对使用AEDs的患者,特别是那些联合用药的患者监测氨水平的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3035/12213827/cfb7fe4ddf1f/fphar-16-1477127-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3035/12213827/6acbea0293e3/fphar-16-1477127-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3035/12213827/00c186652b6b/fphar-16-1477127-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3035/12213827/2fd54b0ee922/fphar-16-1477127-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3035/12213827/20f7ba77d6dc/fphar-16-1477127-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3035/12213827/d678d7d98bd9/fphar-16-1477127-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3035/12213827/cfb7fe4ddf1f/fphar-16-1477127-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3035/12213827/6acbea0293e3/fphar-16-1477127-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3035/12213827/00c186652b6b/fphar-16-1477127-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3035/12213827/2fd54b0ee922/fphar-16-1477127-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3035/12213827/20f7ba77d6dc/fphar-16-1477127-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3035/12213827/d678d7d98bd9/fphar-16-1477127-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3035/12213827/cfb7fe4ddf1f/fphar-16-1477127-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
What drives hyperammonemic encephalopathy in AED users: monotherapy risks or polypharmacy perils?抗癫痫药物使用者发生高氨血症性脑病的驱动因素是什么:单药治疗风险还是联合用药风险?
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jun 18;16:1477127. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1477127. eCollection 2025.
2
Clinical effectiveness, tolerability and cost-effectiveness of newer drugs for epilepsy in adults: a systematic review and economic evaluation.成人癫痫新药的临床疗效、耐受性及成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(15):1-157, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9150.
3
Monotherapy treatment of epilepsy in pregnancy: congenital malformation outcomes in the child.妊娠期癫痫的单药治疗:子代先天性畸形结局
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 7;11(11):CD010224. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010224.pub2.
4
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.抗癫痫药物单药治疗癫痫:一项个体参与者数据的网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 1;4(4):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub4.
5
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.癫痫的抗癫痫药物单药治疗:个体参与者数据的网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 29;6(6):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub2.
6
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.癫痫的抗癫痫药物单药治疗:个体参与者数据的网状荟萃分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 15;12(12):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub3.
7
Topiramate versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.托吡酯与卡马西平单药治疗癫痫的疗效比较:个体参与者数据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 6;12(12):CD012065. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012065.pub2.
8
Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.拉莫三嗪与卡马西平单药治疗癫痫的疗效比较:个体参与者数据回顾
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 28;6(6):CD001031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001031.pub4.
9
Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.拉莫三嗪与卡马西平单药治疗癫痫的疗效比较:个体参与者数据回顾
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 14;11(11):CD001031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001031.pub3.
10
Monotherapy treatment of epilepsy in pregnancy: congenital malformation outcomes in the child.妊娠期癫痫的单药治疗:对子代先天畸形的结局。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 29;8(8):CD010224. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010224.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
A comprehensive review on pharmacological applications and drug-induced toxicity of valproic acid.丙戊酸的药理学应用及药物诱导毒性的综合综述。
Saudi Pharm J. 2023 Feb;31(2):265-278. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2022.12.001. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
2
Quantitative systems pharmacology Model to characterize valproic acid-induced hyperammonemia and the effect of L-carnitine supplementation.定量系统药理学模型用于描述丙戊酸诱导的高血氨症及左卡尼汀补充的影响。
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2023 Apr 1;183:106399. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2023.106399. Epub 2023 Feb 4.
3
Therapeutic and Toxic Effects of Valproic Acid Metabolites.
丙戊酸代谢物的治疗作用与毒性作用
Metabolites. 2023 Jan 16;13(1):134. doi: 10.3390/metabo13010134.
4
Risk factors and outcome of hyperammonaemia in people with epilepsy.癫痫患者高血氨症的风险因素和结果。
J Neurol. 2022 Dec;269(12):6395-6405. doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-11304-7. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
5
A Disproportionality Analysis of Drug-Drug Interactions of Tizanidine and CYP1A2 Inhibitors from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).他克林与 CYP1A2 抑制剂药物相互作用的不适当比例分析:来自 FDA 不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的数据。
Drug Saf. 2022 Aug;45(8):863-871. doi: 10.1007/s40264-022-01200-4. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
6
Peripheral Neuropathy During Concomitant Administration of Proteasome Inhibitors and Factor Xa Inhibitors: Identifying the Likelihood of Drug-Drug Interactions.蛋白酶体抑制剂与Xa因子抑制剂联合使用期间的周围神经病变:确定药物相互作用的可能性。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Mar 14;13:757415. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.757415. eCollection 2022.
7
Valproic-induced Hyperammonemic Encephalopathy Aggravated by Combined Use of Topiramate - A Case Report.丙戊酸诱发的高氨血症性脑病因联用托吡酯而加重——病例报告
Psychiatr Danub. 2021 Summer;33(2):182-184. doi: 10.24869/psyd.2021.182.
8
Hyperammonemic Encephalopathy Associated with Perampanel: Case Report and Discussion.与吡仑帕奈相关的高氨血症性脑病:病例报告与讨论
Can J Neurol Sci. 2021 May;48(3):438-439. doi: 10.1017/cjn.2020.203. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
9
Incidence, Presentation, and Risk Factors for Sodium Valproate-Associated Hyperammonemia in Neurosurgical Patients: A Prospective, Observational Study.神经外科患者中丙戊酸钠相关性高氨血症的发病率、表现及危险因素:一项前瞻性观察研究
World Neurosurg. 2020 Dec;144:e597-e604. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.09.027. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
10
Valproic acid and zonisamide induced hyperammonemic encephalopathy.丙戊酸和唑尼沙胺诱发高氨血症性脑病。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Sep;196:105894. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105894. Epub 2020 May 15.