Tanaka Ippei, Inoue Haruhiro, Tanabe Mayo, Kimoto Yoshiaki, Ushikubo Kei, Yamamoto Kazuki, Nishikawa Yohei, Raymundo Nikko Theodore Valencia, Sumi Kazuya
Digestive Diseases Center Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital Tokyo Japan.
DEN Open. 2025 Jul 1;6(1):e70169. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70169. eCollection 2026 Apr.
INTRODUCTION: Anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) and anti-reflux mucosal ablation (ARMA) are novel endoscopic treatments for proton pump inhibitor or potassium-competitive acid blocker-refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease. These procedures induce scarring of the artificial ulcer at the gastric cardia, which tightens the enlarged cardiac opening. However, we encountered patients with unresolved symptoms due to insufficient cardiac shrinkage despite multiple ARMS/ARMA treatments. This study analyzed the frequency and characteristics of the refractory cases. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent ARMS/ARMA treatments at our institution from January 2014 to October 2022. Refractory cases were defined as those undergoing multiple ARMS/ARMA treatments but with insufficient cardiac shrinkage and also persistence of reflux symptoms. RESULTS: Out of 131 ARMS/ARMA patients, seven (5.3%) cases were categorized as refractory cases. The male-to-female ratio was 5:2, with a mean age of 70 (58-73) years, and a mean BMI of 20.4 (20.0-24.0). Gastroesophageal reflux disease grades were grade ( = 2), M ( = 2), B ( = 2), and C ( = 1). All had NERD diagnosis confirmed by pH monitoring. One patient underwent ARMS twice, two underwent ARMA after ARMS, and four had ARMA more than twice, but none achieved sufficient cardia shrinkage. Finally, three cases were managed with medication, while four required surgical fundoplication, which improved their symptoms. CONCLUSION: Approximately 5% of ARMS/ARMA cases could not achieve sufficient cardiac shrinkage. However, the surgical treatment performed as a final step was effective, which may suggest that ARMS/ARMA treatment serves as a treatment option between medical therapy and surgical treatment.
引言:抗反流黏膜切除术(ARMS)和抗反流黏膜消融术(ARMA)是治疗质子泵抑制剂或钾离子竞争性酸阻滞剂难治性胃食管反流病的新型内镜治疗方法。这些手术会导致胃贲门处人工溃疡形成瘢痕,从而收紧扩大的贲门开口。然而,我们遇到了一些患者,尽管接受了多次ARMS/ARMA治疗,但由于贲门收缩不足,症状仍未得到缓解。本研究分析了难治性病例的发生率和特征。 方法:我们回顾性分析了2014年1月至2022年10月在我院接受ARMS/ARMA治疗的患者。难治性病例定义为接受多次ARMS/ARMA治疗但贲门收缩不足且反流症状持续存在的患者。 结果:在131例ARMS/ARMA患者中,7例(5.3%)被归类为难治性病例。男女比例为5:2,平均年龄为70(58 - 73)岁,平均BMI为20.4(20.0 - 24.0)。胃食管反流病分级为 ( = 2)、M( = 2)、B( = 2)和C( = 1)。所有患者均通过pH监测确诊为NERD。1例患者接受了两次ARMS,2例在ARMS后接受了ARMA,4例接受了两次以上的ARMA,但均未实现足够的贲门收缩。最后,3例患者采用药物治疗,4例需要手术行胃底折叠术,症状得到改善。 结论:约5%的ARMS/ARMA病例无法实现足够的贲门收缩。然而,作为最后一步进行的手术治疗是有效的,这可能表明ARMS/ARMA治疗是药物治疗和手术治疗之间的一种治疗选择。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-1-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005-7-20
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-2-6
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-6-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-11-29
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-3-23
Intern Med. 2024-1-1
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2022-4-29
J Gastroenterol. 2022-4
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020-12
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020-12