文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

多次抗反流黏膜切除术/抗反流黏膜剥脱术后贲门重建不全病例的临床特征与结局

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Incomplete Cardia Reconstruction Cases Following Multiple Anti-reflux Mucosectomy/Anti-reflux Mucosal Ablation Treatments.

作者信息

Tanaka Ippei, Inoue Haruhiro, Tanabe Mayo, Kimoto Yoshiaki, Ushikubo Kei, Yamamoto Kazuki, Nishikawa Yohei, Raymundo Nikko Theodore Valencia, Sumi Kazuya

机构信息

Digestive Diseases Center Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital Tokyo Japan.

出版信息

DEN Open. 2025 Jul 1;6(1):e70169. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70169. eCollection 2026 Apr.


DOI:10.1002/deo2.70169
PMID:40606962
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12213444/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) and anti-reflux mucosal ablation (ARMA) are novel endoscopic treatments for proton pump inhibitor or potassium-competitive acid blocker-refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease. These procedures induce scarring of the artificial ulcer at the gastric cardia, which tightens the enlarged cardiac opening. However, we encountered patients with unresolved symptoms due to insufficient cardiac shrinkage despite multiple ARMS/ARMA treatments. This study analyzed the frequency and characteristics of the refractory cases. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent ARMS/ARMA treatments at our institution from January 2014 to October 2022. Refractory cases were defined as those undergoing multiple ARMS/ARMA treatments but with insufficient cardiac shrinkage and also persistence of reflux symptoms. RESULTS: Out of 131 ARMS/ARMA patients, seven (5.3%) cases were categorized as refractory cases. The male-to-female ratio was 5:2, with a mean age of 70 (58-73) years, and a mean BMI of 20.4 (20.0-24.0). Gastroesophageal reflux disease grades were grade ( = 2), M ( = 2), B ( = 2), and C ( = 1). All had NERD diagnosis confirmed by pH monitoring. One patient underwent ARMS twice, two underwent ARMA after ARMS, and four had ARMA more than twice, but none achieved sufficient cardia shrinkage. Finally, three cases were managed with medication, while four required surgical fundoplication, which improved their symptoms. CONCLUSION: Approximately 5% of ARMS/ARMA cases could not achieve sufficient cardiac shrinkage. However, the surgical treatment performed as a final step was effective, which may suggest that ARMS/ARMA treatment serves as a treatment option between medical therapy and surgical treatment.

摘要

引言:抗反流黏膜切除术(ARMS)和抗反流黏膜消融术(ARMA)是治疗质子泵抑制剂或钾离子竞争性酸阻滞剂难治性胃食管反流病的新型内镜治疗方法。这些手术会导致胃贲门处人工溃疡形成瘢痕,从而收紧扩大的贲门开口。然而,我们遇到了一些患者,尽管接受了多次ARMS/ARMA治疗,但由于贲门收缩不足,症状仍未得到缓解。本研究分析了难治性病例的发生率和特征。 方法:我们回顾性分析了2014年1月至2022年10月在我院接受ARMS/ARMA治疗的患者。难治性病例定义为接受多次ARMS/ARMA治疗但贲门收缩不足且反流症状持续存在的患者。 结果:在131例ARMS/ARMA患者中,7例(5.3%)被归类为难治性病例。男女比例为5:2,平均年龄为70(58 - 73)岁,平均BMI为20.4(20.0 - 24.0)。胃食管反流病分级为 ( = 2)、M( = 2)、B( = 2)和C( = 1)。所有患者均通过pH监测确诊为NERD。1例患者接受了两次ARMS,2例在ARMS后接受了ARMA,4例接受了两次以上的ARMA,但均未实现足够的贲门收缩。最后,3例患者采用药物治疗,4例需要手术行胃底折叠术,症状得到改善。 结论:约5%的ARMS/ARMA病例无法实现足够的贲门收缩。然而,作为最后一步进行的手术治疗是有效的,这可能表明ARMS/ARMA治疗是药物治疗和手术治疗之间的一种治疗选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18fb/12213444/fec01132b509/DEO2-6-e70169-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18fb/12213444/24cc52d7aeee/DEO2-6-e70169-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18fb/12213444/042042d461cc/DEO2-6-e70169-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18fb/12213444/fec01132b509/DEO2-6-e70169-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18fb/12213444/24cc52d7aeee/DEO2-6-e70169-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18fb/12213444/042042d461cc/DEO2-6-e70169-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18fb/12213444/fec01132b509/DEO2-6-e70169-g002.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Incomplete Cardia Reconstruction Cases Following Multiple Anti-reflux Mucosectomy/Anti-reflux Mucosal Ablation Treatments.

DEN Open. 2025-7-1

[2]
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19

[3]
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-1-9

[4]
Sertindole for schizophrenia.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005-7-20

[5]
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-2-6

[6]
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-22

[7]
Topical antiseptics for chronic suppurative otitis media.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-6-9

[8]
Endovenous ablation therapy (laser or radiofrequency) or foam sclerotherapy versus conventional surgical repair for short saphenous varicose veins.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-11-29

[9]
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025-6-26

[10]
Treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in the elderly: a network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-3-23

本文引用的文献

[1]
Long-term efficacy of antireflux mucosectomy in patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Dig Endosc. 2024-3

[2]
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Pathophysiology and New Treatment Trends.

Intern Med. 2024-1-1

[3]
Anti-reflux mucosectomy for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Endosc Int Open. 2022-6-10

[4]
Antireflux mucosal intervention (ARMI) procedures for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2022-4-29

[5]
Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for gastroesophageal reflux disease 2021.

J Gastroenterol. 2022-4

[6]
Antireflux mucosectomy (ARMS) and antireflux mucosal ablation (ARMA) for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Endosc Int Open. 2021-11-12

[7]
Mucosal pathogenesis in gastro-esophageal reflux disease.

Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020-12

[8]
Endoscopic treatment of proton pump inhibitor-refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease with anti-reflux mucosectomy: Experience of 109 cases.

Dig Endosc. 2021-3

[9]
Clinical feasibility of a new antireflux ablation therapy on gastroesophageal reflux disease (with video).

Gastrointest Endosc. 2020-12

[10]
Anti-reflux mucosal ablation (ARMA) as a new treatment for gastroesophageal reflux refractory to proton pump inhibitors: a pilot study.

Endosc Int Open. 2020-2

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索