• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗反流黏膜切除术治疗难治性胃食管反流病:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Anti-reflux mucosectomy for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Garg Rajat, Mohammed Abdul, Singh Amandeep, Schleicher Mary, Thota Prashanthi N, Rustagi Tarun, Sanaka Madhusudhan R

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Digestive Diseases and Surgery Institute; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.

Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.

出版信息

Endosc Int Open. 2022 Jun 10;10(6):E854-E864. doi: 10.1055/a-1802-0220. eCollection 2022 Jun.

DOI:10.1055/a-1802-0220
PMID:35692929
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9187426/
Abstract

Anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) is an emerging endoscopic treatment for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy ARMS in refractory GERD. A comprehensive search of multiple databases (through March 2020) was performed to identify studies that reported outcomes of ARMS for refractory GERD. Outcomes assessed included technical success, clinical response, and adverse events (AEs). Clinical response was defined as discontinuation (complete) or reduction (partial) of proton pump inhibitors post-ARMS at follow up. A total of 307 patients (mean age 46.9 [8.1] years, 41.5 % females) were included from 10 studies. The technical success and clinical response rates were 97.7 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], 94.6-99.0) and 80.1 % (95 % CI, 61.6-91.0), respectively. The pooled rate of complete and partial clinical response was 65.3 % (95 % CI, 51.4-77.0) and 21.5 % (95 % CI, 14.2-31.2), respectively. The rate of AEs was 17.2 % (95 % CI, 13.1-22.2) with most common AE being dysphagia/esophageal stricture followed by bleeding with rates of 11.4 % and 5.0 %, respectively. GERD health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) (mean difference [MD] = 14.9,  < 0.001), GERD questionnaire (GERD-Q) (MD = 4.85,  < 0.001) and mean acid exposure time (MD = 2.39,  = 0.01) decreased significantly post-ARMS as compared to pre-procedure. There was no difference in terms of clinical response and AEs between ARMS and ARMS with banding on subgroup analysis. ARMS is a safe and effective procedure for treatment of refractory GERD with high rates of clinical response, acceptable safety profile and significant improvement in GERD-related quality of life. Prospective studies are needed to validate our findings.

摘要

抗反流黏膜切除术(ARMS)是一种新兴的用于治疗难治性胃食管反流病(GERD)的内镜治疗方法。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估ARMS治疗难治性GERD的安全性和有效性。对多个数据库进行了全面检索(截至2020年3月),以确定报告ARMS治疗难治性GERD结果的研究。评估的结果包括技术成功率、临床反应和不良事件(AE)。临床反应定义为随访时ARMS术后质子泵抑制剂停药(完全)或减量(部分)。10项研究共纳入307例患者(平均年龄46.9[8.1]岁,41.5%为女性)。技术成功率和临床反应率分别为97.7%(95%置信区间[CI],94.6 - 99.0)和80.1%(95%CI,61.6 - 91.0)。完全和部分临床反应的合并率分别为65.3%(95%CI,51.4 - 77.0)和21.5%(95%CI,14.2 - 31.2)。AE发生率为17.2%(95%CI,13.1 - 22.2),最常见的AE是吞咽困难/食管狭窄,其次是出血,发生率分别为11.4%和5.0%。与术前相比,ARMS术后GERD健康相关生活质量(GERD - HRQL)(平均差值[MD]=14.9,<0.001)、GERD问卷(GERD - Q)(MD = 4.85,<0.001)和平均酸暴露时间(MD = 2.39,= 0.01)显著降低。亚组分析显示,ARMS与带环ARMS在临床反应和AE方面无差异。ARMS是一种治疗难治性GERD的安全有效的方法,临床反应率高,安全性可接受,且GERD相关生活质量有显著改善。需要进行前瞻性研究来验证我们的发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d8/9187426/35b7520785a9/10-1055-a-1802-0220-i2519ei4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d8/9187426/c45ca3d5bbc2/10-1055-a-1802-0220-i2519ei1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d8/9187426/00ee13335c72/10-1055-a-1802-0220-i2519ei2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d8/9187426/1b3b4d98fbe1/10-1055-a-1802-0220-i2519ei3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d8/9187426/35b7520785a9/10-1055-a-1802-0220-i2519ei4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d8/9187426/c45ca3d5bbc2/10-1055-a-1802-0220-i2519ei1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d8/9187426/00ee13335c72/10-1055-a-1802-0220-i2519ei2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d8/9187426/1b3b4d98fbe1/10-1055-a-1802-0220-i2519ei3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d8/9187426/35b7520785a9/10-1055-a-1802-0220-i2519ei4.jpg

相似文献

1
Anti-reflux mucosectomy for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.抗反流黏膜切除术治疗难治性胃食管反流病:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endosc Int Open. 2022 Jun 10;10(6):E854-E864. doi: 10.1055/a-1802-0220. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Does the presence of an esophageal motor disorder influence the response to anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) for refractory GERD?食管动力障碍的存在是否会影响抗反流黏膜切除术(ARMS)治疗难治性 GERD 的反应?
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2024 Jun;59(6):639-646. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2024.2331554. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
3
Endoscopic treatment of proton pump inhibitor-refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease with anti-reflux mucosectomy: Experience of 109 cases.抗反流黏膜切除术治疗质子泵抑制剂难治性胃食管反流病的内镜治疗:109例经验
Dig Endosc. 2021 Mar;33(3):347-354. doi: 10.1111/den.13727. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
4
Antireflux mucosectomy (ARMS) and antireflux mucosal ablation (ARMA) for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.抗反流黏膜切除术(ARMS)和抗反流黏膜消融术(ARMA)治疗胃食管反流病:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Nov 12;9(11):E1740-E1751. doi: 10.1055/a-1552-3239. eCollection 2021 Nov.
5
Short and long term effect of anti-reflux mucosectomy with cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection for refractory gastroesophageal disease.采用带帽辅助内镜黏膜切除术进行抗反流黏膜切除术治疗难治性胃食管疾病的短期和长期效果
Surg Endosc. 2024 Apr;38(4):2180-2187. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10766-2. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
6
Pilot study on anti-reflux mucoplasty: Advancing endoscopic anti-reflux therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease.抗反流黏膜成形术的初步研究:推进内镜下胃食管反流病抗反流治疗
Dig Endosc. 2024 Jun;36(6):690-698. doi: 10.1111/den.14711. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
7
Anti-reflux mucosectomy using a cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection method for refractory gastroesophageal disease: a prospective feasibility study.使用帽辅助内镜黏膜切除术治疗难治性胃食管疾病的抗反流黏膜切除术:一项前瞻性可行性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Mar;34(3):1124-1131. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06859-y. Epub 2019 May 28.
8
Efficacy of transoral incisionless fundoplication for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经口无切口抗反流手术治疗难治性胃食管反流病的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endoscopy. 2018 Jul;50(7):708-725. doi: 10.1055/a-0576-6589. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
9
Outcomes of Endoscopic Antireflux Mucosectomy for the Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.内镜抗反流黏膜切除术治疗胃食管反流病的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct 1;58(9):851-856. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000002061.
10
Randomized Controlled Trial of Anti-reflux Mucosectomy Versus Radiofrequency Energy Delivery for Proton Pump Inhibitor-refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.抗反流黏膜切除术与射频能量传递治疗质子泵抑制剂难治性胃食管反流病的随机对照试验
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023 Jul 30;29(3):306-313. doi: 10.5056/jnm21240. Epub 2023 Jun 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Incomplete Cardia Reconstruction Cases Following Multiple Anti-reflux Mucosectomy/Anti-reflux Mucosal Ablation Treatments.多次抗反流黏膜切除术/抗反流黏膜剥脱术后贲门重建不全病例的临床特征与结局
DEN Open. 2025 Jul 1;6(1):e70169. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70169. eCollection 2026 Apr.
2
A comparative analysis of ARMS (anti-reflux mucosectomy) and TIF (transoral incisionless fundoplication) in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).抗反流黏膜切除术(ARMS)与经口无切口胃底折叠术(TIF)治疗胃食管反流病(GERD)的对比分析
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Apr 22;87(6):3596-3609. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003311. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) results in improved recovery and similar reflux quality of life outcomes compared to laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.与腹腔镜下尼氏胃底折叠术相比,抗反流黏膜切除术(ARMS)可改善恢复情况,并使反流相关生活质量结果相似。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Dec;35(12):7174-7182. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08144-9. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
2
Antireflux Mucosectomy Band (ARM-b) in Treatment of Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease After Bariatric Surgery.抗反流黏膜切除术带(ARM-b)治疗肥胖症手术后难治性胃食管反流病。
Obes Surg. 2020 Nov;30(11):4654-4658. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04753-4. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
3
Endoscopic treatment of proton pump inhibitor-refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease with anti-reflux mucosectomy: Experience of 109 cases.
A pilot study on anti-reflux mucoplasty with valve as novel endoscopic therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease.
一项关于以瓣膜进行抗反流黏膜成形术作为胃食管反流病新型内镜治疗方法的初步研究。
DEN Open. 2025 May 4;6(1):e70131. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70131. eCollection 2026 Apr.
4
American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on the diagnosis and management of GERD: methodology and review of evidence.美国胃肠内镜学会关于胃食管反流病诊断和管理的指南:方法与证据综述
VideoGIE. 2024 Dec 18;10(2):81-137. doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2024.10.001. eCollection 2025 Feb.
5
Anti-reflux mucosectomy for proton pump inhibitor refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease with hiatal hernia: A case report.抗反流黏膜切除术治疗合并食管裂孔疝的质子泵抑制剂难治性胃食管反流病:1例报告
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Feb 21;104(8):e41166. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041166.
6
Introducing antireflux mucoplasty with valve: a novel endoscopic treatment for GERD.介绍带瓣膜的抗反流黏膜成形术:一种治疗胃食管反流病的新型内镜治疗方法。
VideoGIE. 2024 Jul 2;9(11):463-467. doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2024.06.009. eCollection 2024 Nov.
7
Antireflux mucosectomy as an effective treatment for GERD after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.抗反流黏膜切除术作为腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后胃食管反流病的有效治疗方法。
VideoGIE. 2024 Jun 6;9(9):389-392. doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2024.05.014. eCollection 2024 Sep.
8
Closure in antireflux mucoplasty using anchor prong clips: dead space-eliminating technique.使用锚叉夹进行抗反流黏膜成形术的闭合:消除死腔技术
VideoGIE. 2024 Mar 21;9(7):303-308. doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2024.03.010. eCollection 2024 Jul.
9
Endoscopic Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.内镜技术在胃食管反流病诊断和治疗中的进展
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jul 11;60(7):1120. doi: 10.3390/medicina60071120.
10
Enhancing closure efficacy in antireflux mucoplasty through endoscopic hand-suturing technique.通过内镜手工缝合技术提高抗反流黏膜成形术的闭合效果。
VideoGIE. 2024 Mar 9;9(6):259-261. doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2024.03.002. eCollection 2024 Jun.
抗反流黏膜切除术治疗质子泵抑制剂难治性胃食管反流病的内镜治疗:109例经验
Dig Endosc. 2021 Mar;33(3):347-354. doi: 10.1111/den.13727. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
4
Antireflux mucosectomy band in treatment of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: a pilot study for safety, feasibility and symptom control.抗反流黏膜切除术带治疗难治性胃食管反流病:安全性、可行性及症状控制的初步研究
Endosc Int Open. 2020 Feb;8(2):E147-E154. doi: 10.1055/a-1038-4012. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
5
Anti-reflux mucosectomy: Can we do better?抗反流黏膜切除术:我们能做得更好吗?
Dig Endosc. 2020 Jul;32(5):736-738. doi: 10.1111/den.13632. Epub 2020 Apr 5.
6
Feasibility and outcomes of anti-reflux mucosectomy for proton pump inhibitor dependent gastroesophageal reflux disease: First Indian study (with video).质子泵抑制剂依赖型胃食管反流病抗反流黏膜切除术的可行性及结果:印度的首项研究(附视频)
Dig Endosc. 2020 Jul;32(5):745-752. doi: 10.1111/den.13606. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
7
Anti-reflux mucosectomy using a cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection method for refractory gastroesophageal disease: a prospective feasibility study.使用帽辅助内镜黏膜切除术治疗难治性胃食管疾病的抗反流黏膜切除术:一项前瞻性可行性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Mar;34(3):1124-1131. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06859-y. Epub 2019 May 28.
8
Heterogeneity in systematic review and meta-analysis: how to read between the numbers.系统评价与荟萃分析中的异质性:如何解读数字背后的信息
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Apr;89(4):902-903. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.10.036.
9
Efficacy of transoral incisionless fundoplication for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经口无切口抗反流手术治疗难治性胃食管反流病的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endoscopy. 2018 Jul;50(7):708-725. doi: 10.1055/a-0576-6589. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
10
Efficacy of Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication vs Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication or Proton Pump Inhibitors in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.腹腔镜 Nissen 胃底折叠术与经口无切口胃底折叠术或质子泵抑制剂治疗胃食管反流病的疗效比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Gastroenterology. 2018 Apr;154(5):1298-1308.e7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.12.021. Epub 2018 Jan 3.