• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术相比,机器人胰十二指肠切除术具有更好的短期疗效:一项荟萃分析。

Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy provides better short-term outcomes as compared to its laparoscopic counterpart: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Liu Faying, Zou Yang, Chen Qing, Chen Tao, Xiao He, Xie Tingbing, Zheng Lihe, Ruan Qi, Liu Wang

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, ChengFei Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2025 Jun 18;15:1568957. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1568957. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2025.1568957
PMID:40606993
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12213548/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy is becoming more and more popular among surgeons, but whether robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) is superior to laparoscopic surgery remains controversial. The study aims to assess the available literature and compare the perioperative outcomes of RPD and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD).

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science databases (October 2024). Risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

The 29 studies that met inclusion criteria included 15137 PDs, out of which 8935 were LPD and 6202 were RPD. Compared with LPD, RPD has lower overall complications (RR, 0.87), conversion rates (RR, 0.47) and blood transfusion rates (RR, 0.56), shorter length of stay (MD, -0.80 days), and higher number of harvested lymph nodes (MD, 1.77). There were no significant differences observed in 90-day mortality (RR, 0.92), major complications (RR, 1.00), operative time (MD, 3.93 mins), blood loss (MD, -22.50 mL), reoperation (RR, 0.96), bile leak (RR, 0.87), postoperative pancreatic fistula (RR, 1.00), delayed gastric emptying (RR, 1.19), and R0 resection (RR, 0.99) between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic-assisted surgery for PD is safe and feasible. Compared to LPD, it offers better short-term outcomes.

摘要

目的

微创胰十二指肠切除术在外科医生中越来越受欢迎,但机器人胰十二指肠切除术(RPD)是否优于腹腔镜手术仍存在争议。本研究旨在评估现有文献,并比较RPD和腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术(LPD)的围手术期结果。

方法

于2024年10月在PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Embase、科学网数据库中进行系统的文献检索。计算风险比(RRs)和平均差(MDs)以及95%置信区间(CIs)。

结果

符合纳入标准的29项研究包括15137例胰十二指肠切除术,其中8935例为LPD,6202例为RPD。与LPD相比,RPD的总体并发症(RR,0.87)、中转率(RR,0.47)和输血率(RR,0.56)更低,住院时间更短(MD,-0.80天),收获的淋巴结数量更多(MD,1.77)。两组在90天死亡率(RR,0.92)、主要并发症(RR,1.00)、手术时间(MD,3.93分钟)、失血量(MD,-22.50毫升)、再次手术(RR,0.96)、胆漏(RR,0.87)、术后胰瘘(RR,1.00)、胃排空延迟(RR,1.19)和R0切除(RR,0.99)方面未观察到显著差异。

结论

机器人辅助胰十二指肠切除术安全可行。与LPD相比,它具有更好的短期结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae65/12213548/dc8ea0139e6c/fonc-15-1568957-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae65/12213548/9366f83059e0/fonc-15-1568957-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae65/12213548/3d2fcfd8bcdb/fonc-15-1568957-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae65/12213548/b1ac3bdd236d/fonc-15-1568957-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae65/12213548/4f7935282a00/fonc-15-1568957-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae65/12213548/65f57b54a6be/fonc-15-1568957-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae65/12213548/dc8ea0139e6c/fonc-15-1568957-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae65/12213548/9366f83059e0/fonc-15-1568957-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae65/12213548/3d2fcfd8bcdb/fonc-15-1568957-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae65/12213548/b1ac3bdd236d/fonc-15-1568957-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae65/12213548/4f7935282a00/fonc-15-1568957-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae65/12213548/65f57b54a6be/fonc-15-1568957-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae65/12213548/dc8ea0139e6c/fonc-15-1568957-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy provides better short-term outcomes as compared to its laparoscopic counterpart: a meta-analysis.与腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术相比,机器人胰十二指肠切除术具有更好的短期疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Front Oncol. 2025 Jun 18;15:1568957. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1568957. eCollection 2025.
2
Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction for the prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy.胰十二指肠切除术后行胰空肠吻合术与胰胃吻合术重建以预防术后胰瘘
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD012257. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012257.pub2.
3
Robotic versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic and periampullary tumors: a meta-analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰腺及壶腹周围肿瘤的Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2024 Nov 19;14:1486504. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1486504. eCollection 2024.
4
Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.良性妇科疾病的子宫切除术手术入路。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 29;8(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub6.
5
Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery.微创胰十二指肠切除术治疗壶腹周围疾病:文献综述及与开放手术对比的结局荟萃分析
BMC Gastroenterol. 2017 Nov 23;17(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12876-017-0691-9.
6
Stents for the prevention of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy.用于预防胰十二指肠切除术后胰瘘的支架
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 6;2016(5):CD008914. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008914.pub3.
7
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术的有限胸骨切开术与全胸骨切开术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 10;4(4):CD011793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub2.
8
Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer.腹腔镜及机器人辅助与开放根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD009625. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009625.pub2.
9
Duct-to-mucosa versus other types of pancreaticojejunostomy for the prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy.胰十二指肠切除术后预防术后胰瘘的胰管-黏膜吻合与其他类型的胰肠吻合术比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 15;3(3):CD013462. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013462.pub2.
10
Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery.胰腺手术的预防性腹腔引流
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 21;10(10):CD010583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010583.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Pancreatic head clockwise devascularization technique during robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy to minimize intraoperative bleeding.机器人胰十二指肠切除术中胰头顺时针去血管化技术以减少术中出血
Surg Endosc. 2025 Aug 28. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12070-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Perioperative outcomes of robotic vs laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的围手术期结局:一项荟萃分析和试验序贯分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Mar;39(3):1462-1472. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11515-1. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
2
Robotic versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic and periampullary tumors: a meta-analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰腺及壶腹周围肿瘤的Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2024 Nov 19;14:1486504. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1486504. eCollection 2024.
3
Short-term surgical outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy: A comparative, single-center, retrospective study.
开腹、腹腔镜和机器人辅助胰十二指肠切除术的短期手术结果:一项比较、单中心、回顾性研究。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2025 Jan-Dec;18(1):e13397. doi: 10.1111/ases.13397.
4
Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and totally laparoscopic PD after overcoming learning curves with comparison of oncologic outcomes between open PD and minimally invasive PD.机器人辅助胰十二指肠切除术(PD)与完全腹腔镜下PD的围手术期结局:在克服学习曲线后,对比开放PD与微创PD的肿瘤学结局
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2024 Nov 30;28(4):508-515. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.24-121. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
5
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Cancer: Evaluation and Analysis of Surgical Efficacy.机器人与腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰腺癌:手术疗效评估与分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;31(10):7043-7051. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15764-1. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
6
Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection for posterosuperior segments: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人与腹腔镜肝切除术治疗后上肝段:系统评价和荟萃分析。
HPB (Oxford). 2024 Sep;26(9):1089-1102. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.06.003. Epub 2024 Jun 16.
7
Comparison of short-term outcomes of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score-matched studies.机器人辅助与开放胰十二指肠切除术短期结局的比较:一项随机对照试验和倾向评分匹配研究的荟萃分析
Int J Surg. 2025 Jan 1;111(1):1214-1230. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001871.
8
Comparison of efficacy and safety between robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for locally advanced mid-low rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.新辅助放化疗后机器人辅助与腹腔镜手术治疗局部进展期中低位直肠癌的疗效和安全性比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Surg. 2025 Jan 1;111(1):1154-1166. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001854.
9
Efficacy and safety of robotic vs. laparoscopic gastrectomy for patients with gastric cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜胃癌切除术治疗胃癌患者的疗效与安全性:系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Surg. 2024 Dec 1;110(12):8045-8056. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001826.
10
Comparative cost-effectiveness of open, laparoscopic, and robotic liver resection: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.开放性、腹腔镜和机器人肝切除术的成本效果比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Surgery. 2024 Jul;176(1):11-23. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.04.015. Epub 2024 May 22.