Damluji Abdulla A, Tomczak Corey R, Hiser Stephanie, O'Neill Deirdre E, Goyal Parag, Pack Quinn R, Foulkes Stephen J, Brown Todd M, Haykowsky Mark J, Needham Dale M, Forman Daniel E
Cardiovascular Center on Aging, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH (A.A.D.).
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (A.A.D).
Circ Res. 2025 Jul 7;137(2):255-272. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.125.325705. Epub 2025 Jul 3.
Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) has evolved from foundations as a postmyocardial infarction mobilization strategy for patients who were typically unstable, into a comprehensive, multidisciplinary program for most patients with cardiovascular disease aimed at optimizing cardiovascular health, reducing morbidity, and enhancing functional recovery. Although contemporary CR patients are now usually more stable from a cardiovascular perspective, needs have expanded for comprehensive approaches to exercise, lifestyle, care coordination, risk factor modification, and stress management. Furthermore, contemporary CR patients now typically include older adults who are contending with cardiovascular disease in the context of multimorbidity, frailty, sarcopenia, sensory limits, and cognitive impairment. The physiological mechanisms underlying exercise intolerance in cardiovascular disease include impairments in cardiac output, vascular function, and skeletal muscle metabolism and relate to elemental biological mechanisms that are common to all 3 as well as to noncardiovascular disease and aging. CR provides an important opportunity to address such aggregate risk. Nonetheless, CR remains underutilized, particularly by older adults, women, and those struggling with cognitive impairments, frailty, logistics, and social barriers to care. Emerging strategies, such as home-based and hybrid CR models, resistance training, and digital health technologies, are expanding the potential for access and effectiveness. Future research brings important opportunities to hone personalized CR strategies tailored to contemporary patient populations, including optimized exercise prescriptions as well as pharmacological, nutritional, and technological adjuncts. Related prospects to distinguish the biological mechanisms underlying patient-preferred clinical end points (eg, independence, quality of life) remain critical to augmenting CR's value in the contemporary therapeutic landscape.
心脏康复(CR)已从最初作为心肌梗死后针对通常病情不稳定患者的动员策略,发展成为一项针对大多数心血管疾病患者的全面、多学科计划,旨在优化心血管健康、降低发病率并促进功能恢复。尽管从心血管角度来看,当代CR患者现在通常病情更稳定,但对于运动、生活方式、护理协调、危险因素修正和压力管理的综合方法的需求却有所增加。此外,当代CR患者现在通常包括在多重疾病、虚弱、肌肉减少症、感觉功能受限和认知障碍背景下与心血管疾病作斗争的老年人。心血管疾病中运动不耐受的生理机制包括心输出量、血管功能和骨骼肌代谢受损,并且与这三者以及非心血管疾病和衰老共有的基本生物学机制有关。CR为应对此类综合风险提供了重要机会。尽管如此,CR的利用率仍然较低,尤其是在老年人、女性以及那些在认知障碍、身体虚弱、后勤保障和社会护理障碍方面存在困难的人群中。新兴策略,如家庭式和混合式CR模式、阻力训练和数字健康技术,正在扩大获得治疗的可能性和提高治疗效果。未来研究为完善针对当代患者群体的个性化CR策略带来了重要机遇,包括优化运动处方以及药物、营养和技术辅助手段。区分患者偏好的临床终点(如独立性、生活质量)背后的生物学机制的相关前景,对于提升CR在当代治疗领域的价值仍然至关重要。