School of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Physiotherapy Department, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
NEJM Evid. 2024 Jul;3(7):EVIDoa2400137. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2400137. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
Critical illness requiring invasive mechanical ventilation can precipitate important functional disability, contributing to multidimensional morbidity following admission to an intensive care unit (ICU). Early in-bed cycle ergometry added to usual physiotherapy may mitigate ICU-acquired physical function impairment.
We randomly assigned 360 adult ICU patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation to receive 30 minutes of early in-bed Cycling + Usual physiotherapy (n=178) or Usual physiotherapy alone (n=182). The primary outcome was the Physical Function ICU Test-scored (PFIT-s) at 3 days after discharge from the ICU (the score ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating better function).
Cycling began within a median (interquartile range) of 2 (1 to 3) days of starting mechanical ventilation; patients received 3 (2 to 5) cycling sessions for a mean (±standard deviation) of 27.2 ± 6.6 minutes. In both groups, patients started Usual physiotherapy within 2 (2 to 4) days of mechanical ventilation and received 4 (2 to 7) Usual physiotherapy sessions. The duration of Usual physiotherapy was 23.7 ± 15.1 minutes in the Cycling + Usual physiotherapy group and 29.1 ± 13.2 minutes in the Usual physiotherapy group. No serious adverse events occurred in either group. Among survivors, the PFIT-s at 3 days after discharge from the ICU was 7.7 ± 1.7 in the Cycling + Usual physiotherapy group and 7.5 ± 1.7 in the Usual physiotherapy group (absolute difference, 0.23 points; 95% confidence interval, -0.19 to 0.65; P=0.29).
Among adults receiving mechanical ventilation in the ICU, adding early in-bed Cycling to usual physiotherapy did not improve physical function at 3 days after discharge from the ICU compared with Usual physiotherapy alone. Cycling did not cause any serious adverse events. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT03471247 [full randomized clinical trial] and NCT02377830 [CYCLE Vanguard 46-patient internal pilot].).
需要有创机械通气的危重病可导致重要的功能障碍,导致入住重症监护病房(ICU)后的多维发病率增加。在开始有创机械通气后早期进行床上周期运动训练并结合常规物理治疗可能会减轻 ICU 获得性的身体功能损害。
我们将 360 名接受有创机械通气的成年 ICU 患者随机分为两组,分别接受 30 分钟的早期床上自行车运动训练+常规物理治疗(n=178)或常规物理治疗(n=182)。主要结局是 ICU 获得性物理功能测试评分(PFIT-s),在 ICU 出院后 3 天(评分范围为 0 至 10,分数越高表示功能越好)。
在开始机械通气后的中位数(四分位间距)2(1 至 3)天内开始进行自行车运动;患者接受了 3(2 至 5)次自行车运动,平均(±标准差)27.2±6.6 分钟。在两组中,患者在机械通气后 2(2 至 4)天内开始接受常规物理治疗,并接受了 4(2 至 7)次常规物理治疗。在接受自行车运动训练+常规物理治疗的组中,常规物理治疗的持续时间为 23.7±15.1 分钟,而在接受常规物理治疗的组中为 29.1±13.2 分钟。两组均未发生严重不良事件。在幸存者中,ICU 出院后 3 天的 PFIT-s 在接受自行车运动训练+常规物理治疗的组中为 7.7±1.7,在接受常规物理治疗的组中为 7.5±1.7(绝对差异,0.23 分;95%置信区间,-0.19 至 0.65;P=0.29)。
在 ICU 接受机械通气的成年人中,与单独接受常规物理治疗相比,在开始有创机械通气后早期进行床上自行车运动训练并结合常规物理治疗并不能改善 ICU 出院后 3 天的身体功能。自行车运动没有引起任何严重的不良事件。(由加拿大卫生研究院和其他机构资助;临床试验.gov 编号,NCT03471247[完整的随机临床试验]和 NCT02377830[CYCLE 先锋 46 名患者内部试验])。