Suppr超能文献

双侧入路经皮椎体成形术(PVP)与侧方孔注射联合改良透视下单侧入路PVP治疗胸腰椎骨质疏松性骨折的疗效比较

Comparison of the efficacy of bilateral approach PVP and lateral hole injection combined with modified fluoroscopic unilateral approach PVP in the treatment of thoracolumbar osteoporotic fractures.

作者信息

Jianmin Yuan, Jianguo Fu, Nengfeng Ma, Xingjing Wu, Jiabing Xie, Zhoushan Tao, Wenjing Cheng, Jingshun Lu

机构信息

Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Yijishan Hospital Affiliated to Wannan Medical College, 241000, Wuhu, Anhui, China.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2025 Jul 3;25(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02985-8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical efficacy of bilateral approach PVP and lateral injection combined with modified fluoroscopic unilateral approach PVP in the treatment of thoracolumbar osteoporotic fractures.

METHODS

The clinical data of 100 patients with thoracolumbar osteoporotic fractures who received treatment in our hospital from January 2018 to January 2021 were retrospectively collected. According to the different surgical methods, group A included 48 patients who received bilateral approach PVP. Group B was composed of 52 patients who received lateral injection combined with modified fluoroscopy. General data, intraoperative data, and postoperative follow-up data of the two groups of patients were collected and statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the general data between the two groups (P > 0.05), and the two groups were comparable. In terms of intraoperative data, the operation time of group B was shorter than that of group A, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The number of intraoperative fluoroscopies in group B was less than that in group A, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05), while patients in group A had a higher bone cement leakage rate, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). In terms of postoperative follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in VAS and ODI scores 1 day before surgery between the two groups (P > 0.05), and statistically significant difference in VAS scores 1 day after surgery, 1,3 and 6 months after surgery between the two groups compared with 1 day before surgery (P < 0.05). The ODI scores 1,3 and 6 months after surgery were statistically significant compared with 1 day before surgery (P < 0.05), while the VAS and ODI scores of the two groups were not statistically significant 1 day after surgery and 1,3 and 6 months after surgery (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with the bilateral approach PVP, lateral injection combined with improved fluoroscopy has the advantages of shorter operation time, fewer intraoperative fluoroscopy times, and lower bone cement leakage rate.

摘要

目的

比较双侧入路经皮椎体成形术(PVP)与侧方注射联合改良透视下单侧入路PVP治疗胸腰椎骨质疏松性骨折的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性收集2018年1月至2021年1月在我院接受治疗的100例胸腰椎骨质疏松性骨折患者的临床资料。根据手术方法不同,A组48例患者接受双侧入路PVP。B组由52例接受侧方注射联合改良透视的患者组成。收集两组患者的一般资料、术中资料及术后随访资料并进行统计学分析。

结果

两组患者一般资料比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),具有可比性。术中资料方面,B组手术时间短于A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。B组术中透视次数少于A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而A组骨水泥渗漏率较高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后随访方面,两组术前1天视觉模拟评分(VAS)和腰椎功能障碍指数(ODI)评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后1天、术后1、3、6个月两组VAS评分与术前1天比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后1、3、6个月ODI评分与术前1天比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而两组术后1天及术后1、3、6个月VAS和ODI评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

与双侧入路PVP相比,侧方注射联合改良透视具有手术时间短、术中透视次数少、骨水泥渗漏率低的优点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0d3/12224668/6375d2a347b3/12893_2025_2985_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验