Factor Shai, Kaz Sagi, Pritsch Tamir, Eisenberg Gilad, Gurel Ron, Rosenblatt Yishai
Hand Surgery Unit, Orthopedic Division, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Affiliated with the Gray Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2025 Jul 2;28(3):289-97. doi: 10.5397/cise.2025.00381.
Terrible triad injury (TTI) poses therapeutic challenges in joint stability and functional recovery. While surgery has traditionally been preferred, recent interest in nonoperative management for select cases has emerged, with studies suggesting positive outcomes for carefully chosen patients.
This retrospective study, conducted at a tertiary medical center, included patients treated conservatively for TTI between 2014 and 2022. Patients younger than 18 years with open or pathological fractures or multiple injuries were excluded. Conservative treatment was chosen for elbows with good alignment, minimal displacement, and no motion block. Progress was monitored clinically and radiographically. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score.
Thirty-nine patients (59% male; mean age, 44.7±18.3 years) were included, with a mean follow-up of 78.5±29.4 months. Falls (46%) and scooter accidents (36%) were the primary injury mechanisms. Radial head fractures comprised Mason type 1 (36%), type 2 (54%), and type 3 (10%), while coronoid fractures were Regan-Morrey type 1 (69%), type 2 (28%), or type 3 (3%). Final range of motion averaged 128.2° flexion, with an 8.2° extension deficit and 85° forearm rotation. The MEPS was excellent in 11, good in 19, and fair in 9 patients; the mean DASH score among all fractures was 12.6. Five patients (13%) required subsequent surgery, and mechanical clicking was reported in 16 patients (41%).
Nonoperative treatment of TTI might be a viable option for selected patients, yielding generally satisfactory outcomes and an acceptable complication rate. Level of evidence: IV.
可怕三联征损伤(TTI)在关节稳定性和功能恢复方面带来了治疗挑战。传统上手术是首选方法,但最近对于某些病例的非手术治疗产生了兴趣,研究表明精心挑选的患者可获得积极的治疗结果。
这项在一家三级医疗中心进行的回顾性研究纳入了2014年至2022年间接受TTI保守治疗的患者。排除了年龄小于18岁、开放性骨折或病理性骨折或多处损伤的患者。对于肘关节对线良好、移位最小且无活动障碍的患者选择保守治疗。通过临床和影像学检查监测病情进展。使用梅奥肘关节功能评分(MEPS)和上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)评分评估功能结果。
纳入39例患者(59%为男性;平均年龄44.7±18.3岁),平均随访78.5±29.4个月。跌倒(46%)和踏板车事故(36%)是主要的致伤机制。桡骨头骨折包括梅森1型(36%)、2型(54%)和3型(10%),而冠突骨折为雷根 - 莫里1型(69%)、2型(28%)或3型(3%)。最终活动范围平均为屈曲128.2°,伸直受限8.2°,前臂旋转85°。11例患者的MEPS为优,19例为良,9例为中;所有骨折患者的平均DASH评分为12.6。5例患者(13%)需要后续手术,16例患者(41%)报告有机械性弹响。
对于部分患者,TTI的非手术治疗可能是一种可行的选择,总体治疗结果令人满意,并发症发生率可接受。证据级别:IV级。