Jones M G, Ramo B W, Raff G L, Hinohara T, Wagner G S
Am J Cardiol. 1985 Nov 1;56(12):753-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(85)91128-2.
Using multiple gated cardiac blood pool imaging and single-plane ventriculography from cardiac catheterization, 2 independent measures of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) were determined in each of 21 patients. Patients were seen 2 to 6 weeks after their first acute myocardial infarction and were free of electrocardiographic evidence of conduction abnormalities and left or right ventricular hypertrophy. Differences between the 2 measures of LVEF were examined and then compared with the extent of myocardial necrosis estimated from the standard 12-lead electrocardiogram using the complete 54-criteria/32-point Selvester QRS scoring system. Regression analysis yielded an r value of 0.81 (SEE = 8.05) for the overall relation between the 2 measures of LVEF. Correlation coefficients of -0.70, -0.66 and -0.72 were obtained for the relations of radionuclide LVEF, catheterization LVEF and the mean of these 2 determinations, respectively, compared with QRS score. A QRS score 4 or less achieved 100% specificity and that of 8 or less 100% sensitivity for predicting an LVEF greater than 40%. Thus, the Selvester QRS scoring system may be of value in identifying patients with or without markedly impaired LVEF. This risk stratification may be important in reaching optimal postinfarction therapeutic decisions.
采用多门控心血池显像和心导管检查的单平面心室造影术,对21例患者分别测定了两种独立的左心室(LV)射血分数(EF)指标。这些患者在首次急性心肌梗死后2至6周接受检查,且无心电图传导异常及左、右心室肥厚的证据。对两种LVEF测量值之间的差异进行了检查,然后与使用完整的54标准/32分塞尔维斯特QRS评分系统从标准12导联心电图估计的心肌坏死程度进行比较。回归分析得出,两种LVEF测量值之间的总体关系的r值为0.81(标准误=8.05)。与QRS评分相比,放射性核素LVEF、心导管检查LVEF以及这两种测定值的平均值之间的相关系数分别为-0.70、-0.66和-0.72。QRS评分为4或更低时,预测LVEF大于40%的特异性达到100%,评分为8或更低时敏感性达到100%。因此,塞尔维斯特QRS评分系统在识别LVEF是否明显受损的患者中可能具有价值。这种风险分层对于做出最佳的梗死后治疗决策可能很重要。