Ikarashi Daiki, Hayakawa Nozomi, Kaneko Go, Sakura Yuma, Endo Yuki, Yamashita Ryo, Shirotake Suguru, Kondo Yukihiro, Kikuchi Eiji, Obara Wataru
Department of Urology, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Iwate, Japan.
Department of Urology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Int J Clin Oncol. 2025 Jul 7. doi: 10.1007/s10147-025-02822-1.
To evaluate the primary resistance factors to enfortumab vedotin (EV) monotherapy by comparing treatment outcomes between the early progressive disease (EPD) group and non-EPD group.
We retrospectively analyzed 121 patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who received EV monotherapy across five institutions between 2019 and 2024. The patients were categorized into the EPD group (n = 34), defined by radiologically confirmed progressive disease within 3 months of EV initiation, and the non-EPD group (n = 87). The clinical parameters and oncological outcomes were compared between groups. The emergence of new metastatic lesions was defined as the detection of metastases in organs not previously identified as metastatic sites at baseline, during prior chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) before the initiation of EV.
The median overall survival was significantly shorter in the EPD group than in the non-EPD group (6.5 vs. 19.9 months, p < 0.001). The EPD group had a significantly higher incidence of new metastatic lesions and a lower prevalence of normal Hb levels. Multivariate analysis identified low Hb and the presence of new metastatic lesions as independent predictors of EPD. Among patients with new metastases in the EPD group, an average of 74% of lesions emerged during ICI treatment and 75% involved multiple foci. Notably, more than 50% of these new lesions showed progression at the same sites following EV therapy.
Patients with low hemoglobin levels and new metastatic lesions before EV treatment may be at increased risk for EPD. For these patients, alternative treatment strategies should be considered before initiating EV.
通过比较早期进展性疾病(EPD)组和非EPD组的治疗结果,评估恩杂鲁胺(EV)单药治疗的主要耐药因素。
我们回顾性分析了2019年至2024年间在五个机构接受EV单药治疗的121例晚期尿路上皮癌患者。患者被分为EPD组(n = 34),定义为在EV开始治疗后3个月内经影像学证实疾病进展,以及非EPD组(n = 87)。比较两组之间的临床参数和肿瘤学结果。新转移病灶的出现定义为在基线时、先前化疗期间或在EV开始前使用免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)时未被确定为转移部位的器官中检测到转移。
EPD组的中位总生存期明显短于非EPD组(6.5个月对19.9个月,p < 0.001)。EPD组新转移病灶的发生率明显更高,正常血红蛋白水平的患病率更低。多变量分析确定低血红蛋白和新转移病灶的存在是EPD的独立预测因素。在EPD组有新转移灶的患者中,平均74%的病灶在ICI治疗期间出现,75%涉及多个病灶。值得注意的是,这些新病灶中有超过50%在EV治疗后在相同部位出现进展。
EV治疗前血红蛋白水平低和有新转移病灶的患者发生EPD的风险可能增加。对于这些患者,在开始EV治疗前应考虑替代治疗策略。