Neguse Sarah, Solanyk Darcy, Hellier Jennifer L, Holmerud David, Massey Scott, Ruff Cathy
Department of Physician Assistant Studies, Rocky Vista University, Englewood, CO USA.
Massey & Martin LLC, New Wilmington, PA USA.
Med Sci Educ. 2025 Feb 15;35(3):1451-1459. doi: 10.1007/s40670-025-02326-7. eCollection 2025 Jun.
This study investigates the impact of prerequisite science courses on student outcomes in a physician assistant (PA) training program. Given the conflicting literature on the necessity of such coursework and the variation in required courses across PA programs, this study aimed to assess whether prerequisite courses are essential for success. One PA program eliminated prerequisite coursework, allowing analysis of impacts on student outcomes. Data from 2018-2021 Centralized Application Service for Physician Assistants (CASPA) records and student performance metrics were analyzed. Stratification analysis and Pearson correlation coefficients were used to assess the relationship between the number of science credit hours and clinical year variables. Results indicate no consistent correlation between completed prerequisite credit hours and student performance on various assessments. Even applicants with minimal (0-1) credit hours performed similarly to those with extensive (> 15) credit hours. There was no statistically significant correlation between prerequisite courses and Physician Assistant National Certifying Exam (PANCE) scores. Additionally, the study found no significant relationship between the nationally benchmarked Physician Assistant Clinical Knowledge Rating and Assessment Tool (patterned off the PANCE) scores and the number of physiology credit hours, but a notable inverse relationship between genetics credit hours and a nationally benchmarked summative examination (End of Curriculum Exam (ECOE)) performance. The analysis revealed that variations in prerequisite coursework did not consistently correlate with student performance across assessments, casting doubt on the necessity of specific science courses for PA program success. However, limitations including fewer candidates with prerequisite coursework requirements, and variability in assessment tools, may influence the generalizability of these results.
本研究调查了医学预科课程对医师助理(PA)培训项目中学生成绩的影响。鉴于关于此类课程必要性的文献存在冲突,且不同PA项目所需课程存在差异,本研究旨在评估预科课程对取得成功是否至关重要。一个PA项目取消了预科课程,从而能够分析其对学生成绩的影响。对2018 - 2021年医师助理集中申请服务(CASPA)记录和学生成绩指标的数据进行了分析。采用分层分析和皮尔逊相关系数来评估理科学分小时数与临床年变量之间的关系。结果表明,已完成的预科课程学分小时数与学生在各项评估中的成绩之间不存在一致的相关性。即使是那些理科学分小时数极少(0 - 1)的申请者,其表现也与那些理科学分小时数较多(> 15)的申请者相似。预科课程与医师助理国家认证考试(PANCE)成绩之间没有统计学上的显著相关性。此外,该研究发现,全国性基准的医师助理临床知识评级与评估工具(以PANCE为蓝本)的成绩与生理学学分小时数之间没有显著关系,但遗传学学分小时数与全国性基准的结业考试(课程结束考试(ECOE))成绩之间存在显著的负相关关系。分析表明,预科课程的差异与学生在各项评估中的成绩之间并非始终相关,这让人质疑特定理科课程对PA项目成功的必要性。然而,包括有预科课程要求的考生较少以及评估工具存在差异等局限性,可能会影响这些结果的普遍性。