• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在使用巴雷特通用II型、凯恩公式和希尔-径向基函数3.0公式预测术后屈光不正中ACD、LT和WTW的重要性。

The Importance of ACD, LT, and WTW in Predicting Postoperative Refraction Using the Barrett Universal II, Kane, and Hill-RBF 3.0 Formulas.

作者信息

Neimark Eli, Eremenko Ron, Braudo Sharon, Reitblat Olga, Kleinmann Guy

出版信息

J Refract Surg. 2025 Jul;41(7):e662-e666. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20250520-03. Epub 2025 Jul 1.

DOI:10.3928/1081597X-20250520-03
PMID:40626428
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the importance of the anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and white-to-white distance (WTW) in predicting the final postoperative refraction using modern formulas.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 140 consecutive eyes that underwent cataract surgery at the Department of Ophthalmology, Edith Wolfson Medical Centre, Holon, Israel. The Barrett Universal II (BUII), Kane, and Hill-RBF 3.0 formulas were calculated for each eye with all combinations of omitting ACD, LT, and WTW, as possible by each formula. Lens constant optimizations were executed. The results were compared to the postoperative refraction.

RESULTS

For the BUII formula, the ACD only variation exhibited a statistically significant increase in mean absolute deviation (MAD) (0.024 diopters [D], = .010) and standard deviation of prediction error (SD-PE) (0.022, = .002) compared with BUII using all parameters, whereas no other variations showed statistically significant differences in MAD or SD-PE. For the Hill-RBF 3.0 formula, both the ACD only (0.012 D, < .001) and ACD+WTW (0.009 D, = .016) variations demonstrated a statistically significant increase in MAD, although no statistically significant differences were observed in SD-PE. For the Kane formula, excluding the LT parameter resulted in a statistically significant increase in MAD (0.020 D, = .034), whereas the increase in SD-PE (0.020, = .266) was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The BUII, Kane, and Hill-RBF 3.0 formulas demonstrated statistically significant, but not clinically meaningful, differences in SD-PE and MAD when ACD, LT, and WTW were excluded in normal biometric eyes. Further research involving eyes with atypical biometric characteristics is warranted to enhance refractive accuracy and minimize outliers. .

摘要

目的

使用现代公式评估前房深度(ACD)、晶状体厚度(LT)和白对白距离(WTW)在预测最终术后屈光方面的重要性。

方法

这是一项对以色列霍隆伊迪丝·沃尔夫森医疗中心眼科连续140只接受白内障手术的眼睛进行的回顾性研究。针对每只眼睛,通过每个公式尽可能地对省略ACD、LT和WTW的所有组合计算巴雷特通用II(BUII)、凯恩和希尔 - RBF 3.0公式。进行了晶状体常数优化。将结果与术后屈光进行比较。

结果

对于BUII公式,与使用所有参数的BUII相比,仅ACD变化显示平均绝对偏差(MAD)有统计学显著增加(0.024屈光度[D],P = 0.010)以及预测误差标准差(SD - PE)有统计学显著增加(0.022,P = 0.002),而其他变化在MAD或SD - PE方面未显示统计学显著差异。对于希尔 - RBF 3.0公式,仅ACD(0.012 D,P < 0.001)和ACD + WTW(0.009 D,P = 0.016)变化均显示MAD有统计学显著增加,尽管在SD - PE方面未观察到统计学显著差异。对于凯恩公式,排除LT参数导致MAD有统计学显著增加(0.020 D,P = 0.034),而SD - PE的增加(0.020,P = 0.266)无统计学显著意义。

结论

在正常生物测量的眼睛中,当排除ACD、LT和WTW时,BUII、凯恩和希尔 - RBF 3.0公式在SD - PE和MAD方面显示出统计学显著但无临床意义的差异。有必要对具有非典型生物测量特征的眼睛进行进一步研究,以提高屈光准确性并尽量减少异常值。

相似文献

1
The Importance of ACD, LT, and WTW in Predicting Postoperative Refraction Using the Barrett Universal II, Kane, and Hill-RBF 3.0 Formulas.在使用巴雷特通用II型、凯恩公式和希尔-径向基函数3.0公式预测术后屈光不正中ACD、LT和WTW的重要性。
J Refract Surg. 2025 Jul;41(7):e662-e666. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20250520-03. Epub 2025 Jul 1.
2
Accuracy of 11 intraocular lens calculation formulas in shallow anterior chamber eyes.在浅前房眼中的 11 种人工晶状体计算公式的准确性。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug;102(5):e705-e711. doi: 10.1111/aos.16654. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
3
Network Meta-analysis of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formula Accuracy in 1016 Eyes With Long Axial Length.1016只眼轴长度较长眼睛的人工晶状体屈光度计算公式准确性的网络荟萃分析
Am J Ophthalmol. 2024 Jan;257:178-186. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.09.009. Epub 2023 Sep 17.
4
A systemic review and network meta-analysis of accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in primary angle-closure conditions.在原发性闭角型青光眼条件下,眼内人工晶状体屈光力计算公式准确性的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 14;17(10):e0276286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276286. eCollection 2022.
5
Accuracy of 12 IOL power calculation formulas in highly myopic eyes.12种人工晶状体屈光力计算公式在高度近视眼中的准确性。
Int Ophthalmol. 2025 Jun 25;45(1):264. doi: 10.1007/s10792-025-03608-0.
6
Relative Behavior of Modern Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas Across a Realistic Range of Biometry Values.现代人工晶状体屈光度计算公式在实际生物测量值范围内的相对行为。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 Jun 28;19:2037-2045. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S529208. eCollection 2025.
7
Anterior chamber morphological and refractive outcomes following phacoemulsification in pseudoexfoliative eyes: A case-control study.真性剥脱性眼病白内障超声乳化术后前房形态及屈光结果:一项病例对照研究。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul;35(4):1213-1220. doi: 10.1177/11206721241310345. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
8
Accuracy assessment of artificial intelligence IOL calculation formulae: utilizing the heteroscedastic statistics and the Eyetemis Analysis Tool.人工智能人工晶状体计算公式的准确性评估:利用异方差统计和Eyetemis分析工具
Eye (Lond). 2024 Dec;38(18):3578-3585. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-03365-x. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
9
Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulae in short eyes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.短眼患者的人工晶状体计算公式的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 Mar;70(3):740-748. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_934_21.
10
The accuracy of VRF intraocular lens power calculation formula in cataract patients after radial keratotomy.放射状角膜切开术后白内障患者中VRF人工晶状体屈光度计算公式的准确性。
Int Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul 4;45(1):278. doi: 10.1007/s10792-025-03645-9.