Suppr超能文献

基于社区研究的谬误

The Fallacy of Community-Based Research.

作者信息

Bajaj Simar S, Kim Jaeah, Stanford Fatima Cody

机构信息

Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Jul 8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09661-w.

Abstract

Community-based research offers the promise of equitable partnerships between researchers and historically marginalized communities, but its potential is often undercut by superficial engagement, rigid institutional structures, and systemic inequities in funding and representation. This essay explores the ethical, procedural, and structural shortcomings of current community-based research practices, highlighting the disconnect between stated goals and actual implementation. It calls for reforms to institutional review boards and funding processes, emphasizing the need for sustained community engagement, power-sharing, and accountability. By reimagining research as a collaborative, long-term partnership, the scientific community can move toward more just and effective public health outcomes.

摘要

基于社区的研究为研究人员与历史上被边缘化的社区之间建立公平的伙伴关系带来了希望,但其潜力常常因表面化的参与、僵化的机构结构以及资金和代表性方面的系统性不平等而受到削弱。本文探讨了当前基于社区的研究实践在伦理、程序和结构方面的缺陷,突出了既定目标与实际实施之间的脱节。它呼吁对机构审查委员会和资金流程进行改革,强调持续的社区参与、权力共享和问责制的必要性。通过将研究重新构想为一种协作性的长期伙伴关系,科学界可以朝着更公正、更有效的公共卫生成果迈进。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验