Shushan Gregory
Birmingham Newman University, Birmingham, UK.
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2025 Feb-Mar;37(2):95-101. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2024.2402429. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
While accounts of near-death experiences (NDEs) are found around the world and throughout history, descriptions of the phenomenon vary widely. Whether arguing for or against the survival hypothesis, most scholarly and scientific discussions of NDEs are predicated on seeing them as either a universal human phenomenon or as an entirely culturally-constructed one. This article will discuss the implications for the survival hypothesis of historical and cross-cultural NDEs, in all their diversity and similarity. On the scientific level, it will consider how the apparent universality of NDEs can be been enlisted to support both survival and materialist hypotheses. On the metaphysical level, this chapter will explore what of afterlife might be philosophically conceivable if we were to accept NDE narratives as reflecting genuine afterlife experiences-particularly given all their diversity.
虽然濒死体验(NDEs)的记载在世界各地和历史上都能找到,但对这一现象的描述却千差万别。无论是支持还是反对生存假说,大多数学术界和科学界对濒死体验的讨论都基于将其视为一种普遍的人类现象,或者完全是一种文化建构的现象。本文将探讨历史和跨文化濒死体验的多样性和相似性对生存假说的影响。在科学层面,将考虑濒死体验明显的普遍性如何被用来支持生存假说和唯物主义假说。在形而上学层面,本章将探讨,如果我们接受濒死体验的叙述反映了真实的来世经历——尤其是考虑到它们的所有多样性,那么从哲学角度来看,什么样的来世可能是可以想象的。