• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

筋膜切口形状与结肠造口旁疝:十字形与加强纵向(“赫普沃思结”):longcross随机对照试验(GECO2研究)

Fascial incision shapes and paracolostomy hernia: cruciate vs. reinforced longitudinal (the "Hepworth hitch"): longcross randomized controlled trial (GECO2 STUDY).

作者信息

Elorza Garazi, Carré Miquel Kraft, Pellino Gianluca, de Andres Olabarria Unai, Marquina Teresa, Escovar Fernando Jiménez, Timoteo Ander, Gonzalez Jose Maria Garcia, Planellas Pere, Espín-Basany Eloy, Enriquez-Navascues Jose Maria

机构信息

Colorectal Surgery, Hospital Universitario Donostia, Donostia, Spain.

Colorectal Surgery, Hospital Universitari Vall d´Hebron, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 Jul 8;40(1):153. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04939-1.

DOI:10.1007/s00384-025-04939-1
PMID:40629015
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12238066/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Primary objective was to compare the rates of parastomal hernia (PH) at 2 years after the creation of a terminal colostomy using two types of fascial incision: cross-shaped and reinforced longitudinal. Secondary objectives included the evaluation of postoperative complications, readmissions, reoperations for PH, and patients' quality of life.

METHODS

This was a multicenter superiority clinical trial conducted at 5 hospitals involving patients with rectal cancer and definitive colostomy. Patients were randomized into two groups: cross incision (n = 42) or reinforced longitudinal incision (n = 52), for the exteriorization of the colon in terminal colostomy. PH at 2 years was determined by physical examination, computed tomography (CT), and symptoms. Baseline data on risk factors for PH, postoperative complications, readmissions, reoperations for symptomatic PH, and quality of life were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 95 patients were included: cross (n = 42) and reinforced longitudinal (n = 52). Demographic characteristics, risk factors for PH, and surgical factors were similar between the two groups. No significant differences were found in the clinical PH rate between the cruciate versus longitudinal incision groups (48.60% vs. 45.20%; p = 0.770), radiological PH (54.30% vs. 53.70%; p = 0.956), or symptomatic PH (14.30% vs. 19%; p = 0.579). The comprehensive complication index (CCI), readmissions, and reoperation rates for symptomatic PH (8.6% vs. 7.1%; p = 0.816) were similar in both groups. No significant differences were observed in the three health aspects evaluated using the EORTC QLQ-C30 scale.

CONCLUSION

The reinforcement of a longitudinal fascial incision as an isolated surgical technique does not reduce the incidence of PH after a 2-year follow-up.

摘要

目的

主要目标是比较采用两种类型的筋膜切口(十字形和加强纵向切口)进行终末结肠造口术后2年的造口旁疝(PH)发生率。次要目标包括评估术后并发症、再入院情况、因PH进行的再次手术以及患者的生活质量。

方法

这是一项在5家医院进行的多中心优效性临床试验,涉及直肠癌和确定性结肠造口术患者。患者被随机分为两组:十字形切口组(n = 42)或加强纵向切口组(n = 52),用于终末结肠造口术中结肠的外置。通过体格检查、计算机断层扫描(CT)和症状确定2年时的PH情况。记录PH危险因素、术后并发症、再入院情况、有症状PH的再次手术以及生活质量的基线数据。

结果

共纳入95例患者:十字形切口组(n = 42)和加强纵向切口组(n = 52)。两组之间的人口统计学特征、PH危险因素和手术因素相似。十字形切口组与纵向切口组在临床PH发生率(48.60%对45.20%;p = 0.770)、放射学PH发生率(54.30%对53.70%;p = 0.956)或有症状PH发生率(14.30%对19%;p = 0.579)方面均未发现显著差异。两组的综合并发症指数(CCI)、再入院率和有症状PH的再次手术率(8.6%对7.1%;p = 0.816)相似。使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织QLQ-C30量表评估的三个健康方面未观察到显著差异。

结论

作为一种单独的手术技术,加强纵向筋膜切口在2年随访后并未降低PH的发生率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6093/12238066/b3790e89c60f/384_2025_4939_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6093/12238066/b3790e89c60f/384_2025_4939_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6093/12238066/b3790e89c60f/384_2025_4939_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Fascial incision shapes and paracolostomy hernia: cruciate vs. reinforced longitudinal (the "Hepworth hitch"): longcross randomized controlled trial (GECO2 STUDY).筋膜切口形状与结肠造口旁疝:十字形与加强纵向(“赫普沃思结”):longcross随机对照试验(GECO2研究)
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 Jul 8;40(1):153. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04939-1.
2
Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications.用于预防切口疝及其他伤口并发症的剖腹手术切口闭合方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 3;11(11):CD005661. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005661.pub2.
3
Prosthetic mesh placement for the prevention of parastomal herniation.放置人工补片预防造口旁疝。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 20;7(7):CD008905. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008905.pub3.
4
Recovery after abdominal wall reconstruction.腹壁重建后的恢复
Dan Med J. 2017 Mar;64(3).
5
Effect of transverse versus midline periumbilical incision on incisional hernia and short-term outcomes after laparoscopic colon cancer surgery: multicentre, open-label, randomized clinical trial.腹腔镜结肠癌手术后横向与脐周中线切口对切口疝及短期结局的影响:多中心、开放标签、随机临床试验
BJS Open. 2025 May 7;9(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf062.
6
The epidemiology and risk factors for recurrence after inguinal hernia surgery.腹股沟疝修补术后复发的流行病学及危险因素
Dan Med J. 2014 May;61(5):B4846.
7
Current state of laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair: A meta-analysis.腹腔镜造口旁疝修补术的现状:一项荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul 28;21(28):8670-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i28.8670.
8
Invasive urodynamic investigations in the management of women with refractory overactive bladder symptoms: FUTURE, a superiority RCT and economic evaluation.侵入性尿动力学检查在难治性膀胱过度活动症女性患者管理中的应用:FUTURE,一项优效性随机对照试验及经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(27):1-139. doi: 10.3310/UKYW4923.
9
Systemic and local collagen turnover in hernia patients.疝气患者的全身和局部胶原蛋白更新情况。
Dan Med J. 2016 Jul;63(7).
10
Prenatal interventions for congenital diaphragmatic hernia for improving outcomes.用于改善先天性膈疝预后的产前干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 27;2015(11):CD008925. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008925.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Prophylactic mesh does not prevent parastomal hernia in long-term: Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.预防性补片并不能预防长期肠造口旁疝:Meta 分析和试验序贯分析。
Surgery. 2024 Feb;175(2):441-450. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.09.038. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
2
The perfect stoma: tips from a stoma nurse.完美造口:造口护士的小贴士
Br J Surg. 2023 Sep 6;110(10):1249-1251. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad084.
3
Quality of Life in Patients Living with Stoma.肠造口患者的生活质量。
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2021 Sep;31(5):993-1000. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v31i5.11.
4
Risk factors for the development of a parastomal hernia in patients with enterostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肠造口术后发生造口旁疝的风险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Mar;37(3):507-519. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-04068-5. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
5
End Colostomy With or Without Mesh to Prevent a Parastomal Hernia (GRECCAR 7): A Prospective, Randomized, Double Blinded, Multicentre Trial.经肛门内镜微创手术与传统经肛门内镜微创手术治疗直肠肿瘤的临床疗效对比
Ann Surg. 2021 Dec 1;274(6):928-934. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004371.
6
Prevention and treatment of parastomal hernia: a position statement on behalf of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.肠造口旁疝的预防和治疗:英国和爱尔兰结直肠外科学会的立场声明。
Colorectal Dis. 2018 Jul;20 Suppl 2:5-19. doi: 10.1111/codi.14249.
7
'Hepworth hitch': parastomal hernia prevention by simple modifications of operative techniques.
Tech Coloproctol. 2018 Jun;22(6):461-463. doi: 10.1007/s10151-018-1808-z. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
8
Use of Prophylactic Mesh When Creating a Colostomy Does Not Prevent Parastomal Hernia: A Randomized Controlled Trial-STOMAMESH.预防性使用补片在创建肠造口时不能预防造口旁疝:一项随机对照试验-STOMAMESH。
Ann Surg. 2019 Mar;269(3):427-431. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002542.
9
Incidence and risk factors for parastomal bulging in patients with ileostomy or colostomy: a register-based study using data from the Danish Stoma Database Capital Region.回肠造口或结肠造口患者发生造口旁疝的发病率和危险因素:基于丹麦造口数据库首都大区数据的注册研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2018 Apr;20(4):331-340. doi: 10.1111/codi.13907.
10
Preventing Parastomal Hernia Using a Modified Sugarbaker Technique With Composite Mesh During Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Resection: A Randomized Controlled Trial.在腹腔镜腹会阴联合切除术中使用改良Sugarbaker技术加复合补片预防造口旁疝:一项随机对照试验
Ann Surg. 2016 Dec;264(6):923-928. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001684.