Validation of the Toronto recurrence inference using machine-learning for post-transplant hepatocellular carcinoma model.

BACKGROUND

Organ shortages require prioritizing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with the highest survival benefit for allografts. While traditional models like AFP, MORAL, and HALT-HCC are commonly used for recurrence risk prediction, the TRIUMPH model, which uses machine learning, has shown superior performance. This study aims to externally validate the model.

METHODS

The cohort included 2844 HCC patients who underwent liver transplantation at six international centers from 2000-2022. The TRIUMPH model utilized a regularized Cox proportional hazards approach with a penalty term for coefficient adjustment. Discrimination was assessed using the c-index, and clinical utility was evaluated via decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

The most common liver diseases are hepatitis C (49%) and hepatitis B (27%). At listing, 84% meets the Milan criteria, and 91% are within criteria at transplant. Median model for end-stage liver disease score is 10 (IQR:8-14), alpha-fetoprotein level 8 ng/mL (IQR:4-25), and tumor size 2 cm (IQR:1.1-3.0). Living donor grafts are used in 24% of cases. Recurrence rate is 9.1% with a median time to recurrence of 17.5 months. Recurrence-free survival rates at 1/3/5 years are 95.7%/89.5%/87.7%, respectively. The TRIUMPH model achieves the highest c-index (0.71), outperforming MORAL (0.61, p = 0.049) and AFP (0.61, p = 0.04), though not significantly better than HALT-HCC (0.67, p = 0.28). TRIUMPH shows superior clinical utility up to a threshold of 0.6.

CONCLUSIONS

The TRIUMPH model demonstrates good accuracy and clinical utility in predicting post-transplant HCC recurrence. Its integration into organ allocation could improve transplantation outcomes.