Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Dumont-UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) Transplant and Liver Cancer Centers, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Liver Transpl. 2023 Jul 1;29(7):683-697. doi: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000145. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
HCC recurrence following liver transplantation (LT) is highly morbid and occurs despite strict patient selection criteria. Individualized prediction of post-LT HCC recurrence risk remains an important need. Clinico-radiologic and pathologic data of 4981 patients with HCC undergoing LT from the US Multicenter HCC Transplant Consortium (UMHTC) were analyzed to develop a REcurrent Liver cAncer Prediction ScorE (RELAPSE). Multivariable Fine and Gray competing risk analysis and machine learning algorithms (Random Survival Forest and Classification and Regression Tree models) identified variables to model HCC recurrence. RELAPSE was externally validated in 1160 HCC LT recipients from the European Hepatocellular Cancer Liver Transplant study group. Of 4981 UMHTC patients with HCC undergoing LT, 71.9% were within Milan criteria, 16.1% were initially beyond Milan criteria with 9.4% downstaged before LT, and 12.0% had incidental HCC on explant pathology. Overall and recurrence-free survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 89.7%, 78.6%, and 69.8% and 86.8%, 74.9%, and 66.7%, respectively, with a 5-year incidence of HCC recurrence of 12.5% (median 16 months) and non-HCC mortality of 20.8%. A multivariable model identified maximum alpha-fetoprotein (HR = 1.35 per-log SD, 95% CI,1.22-1.50, p < 0.001), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (HR = 1.16 per-log SD, 95% CI,1.04-1.28, p < 0.006), pathologic maximum tumor diameter (HR = 1.53 per-log SD, 95% CI, 1.35-1.73, p < 0.001), microvascular (HR = 2.37, 95%-CI, 1.87-2.99, p < 0.001) and macrovascular (HR = 3.38, 95% CI, 2.41-4.75, p < 0.001) invasion, and tumor differentiation (moderate HR = 1.75, 95% CI, 1.29-2.37, p < 0.001; poor HR = 2.62, 95% CI, 1.54-3.32, p < 0.001) as independent variables predicting post-LT HCC recurrence (C-statistic = 0.78). Machine learning algorithms incorporating additional covariates improved prediction of recurrence (Random Survival Forest C-statistic = 0.81). Despite significant differences in European Hepatocellular Cancer Liver Transplant recipient radiologic, treatment, and pathologic characteristics, external validation of RELAPSE demonstrated consistent 2- and 5-year recurrence risk discrimination (AUCs 0.77 and 0.75, respectively). We developed and externally validated a RELAPSE score that accurately discriminates post-LT HCC recurrence risk and may allow for individualized post-LT surveillance, immunosuppression modification, and selection of high-risk patients for adjuvant therapies.
肝癌患者接受肝移植(LT)后复发的风险很高,尽管进行了严格的患者选择标准。因此,个体化预测 LT 后 HCC 复发风险仍然是一个重要的需求。我们分析了来自美国多中心 HCC 移植联盟(UMHTC)的 4981 名 HCC 患者的临床放射学和病理学数据,以开发复发肝癌预测评分(REcurrent Liver cAncer Prediction ScorE,RELAPSE)。多变量 Fine 和 Gray 竞争风险分析和机器学习算法(随机生存森林和分类回归树模型)确定了用于建模 HCC 复发的变量。RELAPSE 在来自欧洲肝癌肝移植研究小组的 1160 名 HCC LT 接受者中进行了外部验证。在接受 LT 的 4981 名 HCC 患者中,71.9%符合米兰标准,16.1%最初超出米兰标准,其中 9.4%在 LT 前降级,12.0%在肝移植标本中发现偶然 HCC。总体和无复发生存率在 1、3 和 5 年分别为 89.7%、78.6%和 69.8%和 86.8%、74.9%和 66.7%,5 年 HCC 复发率为 12.5%(中位 16 个月),非 HCC 死亡率为 20.8%。多变量模型确定了最大甲胎蛋白(HR = 1.35 per-log SD,95%CI,1.22-1.50,p < 0.001)、中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值(HR = 1.16 per-log SD,95%CI,1.04-1.28,p < 0.006)、最大病理肿瘤直径(HR = 1.53 per-log SD,95%CI,1.35-1.73,p < 0.001)、微血管(HR = 2.37,95%-CI,1.87-2.99,p < 0.001)和大血管(HR = 3.38,95%CI,2.41-4.75,p < 0.001)侵犯以及肿瘤分化(中度 HR = 1.75,95%CI,1.29-2.37,p < 0.001;差 HR = 2.62,95%CI,1.54-3.32,p < 0.001)是预测 LT 后 HCC 复发的独立变量(C 统计量 = 0.78)。纳入其他协变量的机器学习算法提高了对复发的预测(随机生存森林 C 统计量 = 0.81)。尽管欧洲肝癌肝移植受者的放射学、治疗和病理学特征存在显著差异,但 RELAPSE 的外部验证表明其在 2 年和 5 年复发风险的区分度仍然一致(AUC 分别为 0.77 和 0.75)。我们开发并进行了外部验证的 RELAPSE 评分能够准确区分 LT 后 HCC 复发风险,可能有助于个体化 LT 后监测、免疫抑制药物修改以及高危患者选择辅助治疗。