Liu Yibing, Zhang Zhenzhuo, Zhu Guomao, Liang Jinqian
Department of Orthopedics, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2025 May-Aug;33(2):10225536251357770. doi: 10.1177/10225536251357770. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of preoperative spinal flexibility in guiding osteotomy selection for idiopathic scoliosis (IS) surgery. Specifically, it aimed to identify a flexibility threshold to optimize the decision-making process between Grade I (Facet Joint Osteotomy, FJO) and Grade II (Ponte Osteotomy, PO) osteotomy techniques. This retrospective study included 77 IS patients who underwent osteotomy surgeries performed by two experienced spine surgeons at our hospital between 2018 and 2023. Based on the osteotomy type, patients were divided into the FJO group ( = 41) and the PO group ( = 36). Demographic data, preoperative spinal flexibility (measured as the ratio of curve correction on bending X-rays to the standing Cobb angle), and surgical correction rates were compared. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis was used to identify the flexibility threshold. Complication rates, hospital stay duration, and blood loss were also analyzed. RCS analysis identified a flexibility threshold of 0.657. Below this threshold, PO achieved superior correction rates, while above it, FJO showed comparable correction outcomes with fewer complications, shorter hospital stays, and lower blood loss. Spinal flexibility was significantly correlated with surgical outcomes, and the type of osteotomy influenced correction rates and complication severity. Preoperative spinal flexibility is a critical factor in osteotomy selection for IS surgery. PO is recommended for flexibility <0.657, while FJO is preferred for higher flexibility. Flexibility-based surgical planning can improve correction outcomes, minimize complications, and enhance recovery in IS patients.
本研究的目的是评估术前脊柱柔韧性在指导特发性脊柱侧凸(IS)手术截骨选择中的作用。具体而言,其旨在确定一个柔韧性阈值,以优化I级(小关节截骨术,FJO)和II级( Ponte截骨术,PO)截骨技术之间的决策过程。这项回顾性研究纳入了2018年至2023年间在我院由两位经验丰富的脊柱外科医生进行截骨手术的77例IS患者。根据截骨类型,患者被分为FJO组(n = 41)和PO组(n = 36)。比较了人口统计学数据、术前脊柱柔韧性(以弯曲X线片上的曲线矫正度与站立位Cobb角的比值衡量)和手术矫正率。采用限制性立方样条(RCS)分析来确定柔韧性阈值。还分析了并发症发生率、住院时间和失血量。RCS分析确定的柔韧性阈值为0.657。低于该阈值时,PO的矫正率更高,而高于该阈值时,FJO的矫正效果相当,并发症更少,住院时间更短,失血量更低。脊柱柔韧性与手术结果显著相关,截骨类型影响矫正率和并发症严重程度。术前脊柱柔韧性是IS手术截骨选择的关键因素。对于柔韧性<0.657的患者,推荐采用PO,而对于柔韧性较高的患者,首选FJO。基于柔韧性的手术规划可以改善矫正效果,将并发症降至最低,并促进IS患者的康复。