Holland David, Halsall Ian, Heald Adrian H, Stedman Mike, Hanna Fahmy W F, Fryer Anthony A
The Benchmarking Partnership, Smart Innovation Hub, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Diabetes Ther. 2025 Jul 9. doi: 10.1007/s13300-025-01766-z.
The appropriate use of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), the international standard for assessing overall glycaemic status in diabetes mellitus, is critical to ensuring optimal clinical outcome and minimise complications. We describe a clinical laboratory-led general practice service development to facilitate targeted follow-up in high-risk patients.
The service development comprised monthly reports identifying high-risk individuals (HbA1c ≥ 58 mmol/mol) overdue HbA1c testing, sent by the Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory to general practices in the 'Intervention' group (n = 60). A 'Non-intervention' group comprised 51 practices not sent the reports. Comparisons comprised: (i) intervention vs non-intervention groups during two time periods (pre-intervention: 2017-2020; 275,843 tests; 59,206 patients, and post-intervention: 2020-2023; 307,525 tests; 65,449 patients), (ii) pre- versus post-intervention in each group.
The intervention group (vs non-intervention group) showed larger net change in proportion overdue a test (- 20.6% vs - 10.3%, p < 0.001), particularly in the > 75 mmol/mol category (7.8-fold larger improvement, p < 0.001). Improvements were also observed in median time overdue in the 58-75 mmol/mol group (- 14.3 vs - 4.3%; p = 0.027). Improvements were identified in median HbA1c (p = 0.012) and overall proportion with HbA1c ≥ 58 mmol/mol (p = 0.037), compared with the non-intervention group, despite performing more tests/patient/year (p < 0.001). All remained significant after adjustment for practice characteristics (age, sex, social deprivation, list size, diabetes prevalence) and pre-intervention levels.
Our findings indicate that clinical laboratories can support general practices facilitating targeting monitoring to high-risk patients. Providing succinct reports that identify patients overdue for testing can reduce the number of such patients, thereby improving diabetes control and increasing the achievement of target levels.
糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)是评估糖尿病患者整体血糖状况的国际标准,合理使用该指标对于确保最佳临床疗效和减少并发症至关重要。我们描述了一项由临床实验室主导的全科医疗服务发展项目,以促进对高危患者的针对性随访。
该服务发展项目包括临床生物化学实验室每月向“干预”组(n = 60)的全科医疗诊所发送报告,识别HbA1c检测逾期的高危个体(HbA1c≥58 mmol/mol)。“非干预”组包括51个未收到报告的诊所。比较内容包括:(i)两个时间段内干预组与非干预组(干预前:2017 - 2020年;275,843次检测;共59,206名患者,干预后:2020 - 2023年;307,525次检测;共65,449名患者),(ii)每组干预前与干预后的情况。
干预组(与非干预组相比)检测逾期比例的净变化更大(-20.6% 对 -10.3%,p < 0.001),尤其是在HbA1c>75 mmol/mol的类别中(改善幅度大7.8倍,p < 0.001)。在HbA1c为58 - 75 mmol/mol组中,逾期中位数时间也有改善(-14.3% 对 -4.3%;p = 0.027)。与非干预组相比,干预组的HbA1c中位数(p = 0.012)以及HbA1c≥58 mmol/mol的总体比例(p = 0.037)均有所改善,尽管干预组每年每位患者的检测次数更多(p < 0.001)。在对诊所特征(年龄、性别、社会剥夺程度、名单规模、糖尿病患病率)和干预前水平进行调整后,所有差异仍具有统计学意义。
我们的研究结果表明,临床实验室可以支持全科医疗诊所,促进对高危患者的靶向监测。提供能识别检测逾期患者简明报告,可以减少此类患者数量,从而改善糖尿病控制情况并提高目标水平的达成率。