Suppr超能文献

外科主动脉瓣经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAV-in-SAV)中冠状动脉阻塞风险的评估。

Estimation of Coronary Obstruction Risk for the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Surgical Aortic Valve (TAV-in-SAV) Procedure.

作者信息

Kawamura Ai, Shimamura Kazuo, Yoshioka Daisuke, Misumi Yusuke, Yamashita Kizuku, Yajima Shin, Maeda Koichi, Kawamura Takuji, Saito Shunsuke, Matsuhiro Yutaka, Kosugi Shumpei, Nakamura Daisuke, Mizote Isamu, Sakata Yasushi, Miyagawa Shigeru

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Osaka.

Department of Cardiology, The University of Osaka.

出版信息

Circ J. 2025 Aug 25;89(9):1472-1479. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-24-1003. Epub 2025 Jul 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To consider transcatheter aortic valve-in-surgical aortic valve (TAV-in-SAV) as a secondary intervention, the risk of coronary obstruction during future TAV-in-SAV should be assessed prior to initial SAV replacement (SAVR), especially in Japanese patients with a small body size and aortic root anatomy. In this study we simulated the risk of coronary obstruction and identified associated anatomical factors.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively analyzed pre- and post-SAVR computed tomography scans of 115 patients and simulated the risk of coronary obstruction. High risk was defined as postoperative coronary arteries located below the risk plane (RP) and a valve-to-coronary distance <4 mm or a valve-to-aorta distance <2 mm; 28.7% of patients were classified as high risk. Preoperative right and left coronary artery heights of ≥22 and ≥18 mm, respectively, were important parameters for classifying patients with postoperative coronary arteries located above or below the RP. An expected valve-to-sinotubular junction (STJ) distance (defined as the difference between the preoperative STJ diameter and the expected internal valve diameter) ≥7 mm was another important parameter to stratify patients into low- and high-risk categories.

CONCLUSIONS

TAV-in-SAV was anatomically unfeasible in 28.7% of patients, and the coronary obstruction risk was associated with aortic root anatomy and implanted valve size. These results may provide a basis for considering TAV-in-SAV as a secondary option in Japanese patients with a small body size and aortic root anatomy.

摘要

背景

为了将经导管主动脉瓣植入外科主动脉瓣(TAV-in-SAV)作为一种二次干预措施,在首次外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)之前,应评估未来TAV-in-SAV期间冠状动脉阻塞的风险,尤其是在体型较小且有主动脉根部解剖结构的日本患者中。在本研究中,我们模拟了冠状动脉阻塞的风险并确定了相关的解剖学因素。

方法和结果

我们回顾性分析了115例患者SAVR前后的计算机断层扫描,并模拟了冠状动脉阻塞的风险。高风险定义为术后冠状动脉位于风险平面(RP)以下,瓣膜至冠状动脉距离<4mm或瓣膜至主动脉距离<2mm;28.7%的患者被归类为高风险。术前右冠状动脉和左冠状动脉高度分别≥22mm和≥18mm,是将术后冠状动脉位于RP上方或下方的患者进行分类的重要参数。预期瓣膜至窦管交界(STJ)距离(定义为术前STJ直径与预期瓣膜内径之差)≥7mm是将患者分为低风险和高风险类别的另一个重要参数。

结论

28.7%的患者在解剖学上无法进行TAV-in-SAV手术,冠状动脉阻塞风险与主动脉根部解剖结构和植入瓣膜大小有关。这些结果可为将TAV-in-SAV作为体型较小且有主动脉根部解剖结构的日本患者的二次选择提供依据。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验