Kawamura Ai, Shimamura Kazuo, Yoshioka Daisuke, Misumi Yusuke, Yamashita Kizuku, Yajima Shin, Maeda Koichi, Kawamura Takuji, Saito Shunsuke, Matsuhiro Yutaka, Kosugi Shumpei, Nakamura Daisuke, Mizote Isamu, Sakata Yasushi, Miyagawa Shigeru
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Osaka.
Department of Cardiology, The University of Osaka.
Circ J. 2025 Aug 25;89(9):1472-1479. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-24-1003. Epub 2025 Jul 8.
To consider transcatheter aortic valve-in-surgical aortic valve (TAV-in-SAV) as a secondary intervention, the risk of coronary obstruction during future TAV-in-SAV should be assessed prior to initial SAV replacement (SAVR), especially in Japanese patients with a small body size and aortic root anatomy. In this study we simulated the risk of coronary obstruction and identified associated anatomical factors.
We retrospectively analyzed pre- and post-SAVR computed tomography scans of 115 patients and simulated the risk of coronary obstruction. High risk was defined as postoperative coronary arteries located below the risk plane (RP) and a valve-to-coronary distance <4 mm or a valve-to-aorta distance <2 mm; 28.7% of patients were classified as high risk. Preoperative right and left coronary artery heights of ≥22 and ≥18 mm, respectively, were important parameters for classifying patients with postoperative coronary arteries located above or below the RP. An expected valve-to-sinotubular junction (STJ) distance (defined as the difference between the preoperative STJ diameter and the expected internal valve diameter) ≥7 mm was another important parameter to stratify patients into low- and high-risk categories.
TAV-in-SAV was anatomically unfeasible in 28.7% of patients, and the coronary obstruction risk was associated with aortic root anatomy and implanted valve size. These results may provide a basis for considering TAV-in-SAV as a secondary option in Japanese patients with a small body size and aortic root anatomy.
为了将经导管主动脉瓣植入外科主动脉瓣(TAV-in-SAV)作为一种二次干预措施,在首次外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)之前,应评估未来TAV-in-SAV期间冠状动脉阻塞的风险,尤其是在体型较小且有主动脉根部解剖结构的日本患者中。在本研究中,我们模拟了冠状动脉阻塞的风险并确定了相关的解剖学因素。
我们回顾性分析了115例患者SAVR前后的计算机断层扫描,并模拟了冠状动脉阻塞的风险。高风险定义为术后冠状动脉位于风险平面(RP)以下,瓣膜至冠状动脉距离<4mm或瓣膜至主动脉距离<2mm;28.7%的患者被归类为高风险。术前右冠状动脉和左冠状动脉高度分别≥22mm和≥18mm,是将术后冠状动脉位于RP上方或下方的患者进行分类的重要参数。预期瓣膜至窦管交界(STJ)距离(定义为术前STJ直径与预期瓣膜内径之差)≥7mm是将患者分为低风险和高风险类别的另一个重要参数。
28.7%的患者在解剖学上无法进行TAV-in-SAV手术,冠状动脉阻塞风险与主动脉根部解剖结构和植入瓣膜大小有关。这些结果可为将TAV-in-SAV作为体型较小且有主动脉根部解剖结构的日本患者的二次选择提供依据。