Olivieri Chiara, Tibaldi Tommaso, Berni Alessandro, Eandi Chiara Maria, Neri Giovanni, Fai Antonio, Viggiano Pasquale, Marolo Paola, Bandello Francesco, Reibaldi Michele, Borrelli Enrico
Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Department of Ophthalmology, "City of Health and Science" Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Eye (Lond). 2025 Jul 9. doi: 10.1038/s41433-025-03909-9.
To assess the reliability of en face swept-source OCT (SS-OCT) imaging for quantifying macular atrophy in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and evaluate its limitations compared to green autofluorescence (GAF) imaging.
This prospective observational study included 30 patients with macular atrophy associated with neovascular AMD previously treated with anti-VEGF therapy. Multimodal imaging included GAF and en face SS-OCT. Macular atrophy was quantified as regions of hypoautofluorescence on GAF and hypertransmission defects (hyperTDs) on en face SS-OCT. Two masked graders measured atrophy size, followed by qualitative analysis of inter-modality discrepancies. Statistical comparisons were conducted using the Wilcoxon test and Spearman correlation.
Mean macular atrophy size was 5.96 ± 4.48 mm² on SS-OCT and 7.10 ± 5.47 mm² on GAF, with a significant difference (p < 0.001) but strong correlation (ρ = 0.998, p < 0.001). Discrepancies arose due to hyperpigmentation obscuring hyperTDs and macular haemorrhages on SS-OCT underestimations of atrophy. Additionally, fibrosis also reduced choroidal hypertransmission, complicating hyperTD detection on SS-OCT. Border delineation inconsistencies were also observed, with diminished autofluorescence on GAF not always corresponding to hyperTDs on SS-OCT.
En face SS-OCT is a reliable imaging modality for quantifying macular atrophy in neovascular AMD, with strong correlation to GAF measurements. However, hyperpigmentation, fibrosis, haemorrhages, and variability in border delineation introduce significant challenges. These findings underscore the need for careful interpretation of atrophy metrics and highlight the importance of addressing inter-modality discrepancies in clinical and research applications.
评估经面扫频源光学相干断层扫描(SS-OCT)成像在量化新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)患者黄斑萎缩方面的可靠性,并评估其与绿色自发荧光(GAF)成像相比的局限性。
这项前瞻性观察性研究纳入了30例先前接受抗VEGF治疗的伴有新生血管性AMD的黄斑萎缩患者。多模态成像包括GAF和经面SS-OCT。黄斑萎缩在GAF上被量化为低自发荧光区域,在经面SS-OCT上被量化为高透射缺陷(hyperTDs)。两名盲法分级者测量萎缩大小,随后对模态间差异进行定性分析。使用Wilcoxon检验和Spearman相关性进行统计比较。
SS-OCT上黄斑萎缩的平均大小为5.96±4.48mm²,GAF上为7.10±5.47mm²,差异有统计学意义(p<0.001)但相关性很强(ρ=0.998,p<0.001)。差异的出现是由于色素沉着掩盖了hyperTDs,以及SS-OCT上黄斑出血导致萎缩低估。此外,纤维化也降低了脉络膜高透射率,使SS-OCT上的hyperTD检测复杂化。还观察到边界划定不一致,GAF上自发荧光减弱并不总是对应于SS-OCT上的hyperTDs。
经面SS-OCT是量化新生血管性AMD黄斑萎缩的可靠成像方式,与GAF测量有很强的相关性。然而,色素沉着、纤维化、出血和边界划定的变异性带来了重大挑战。这些发现强调了仔细解读萎缩指标的必要性,并突出了在临床和研究应用中解决模态间差异的重要性。