Lee Kyoung Suk, Lee Jihyang
The Research Institute of Nursing Science, College of Nursing, Seoul National University, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.
College of Nursing, Seoul National University, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Jul 9;26(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02916-9.
BACKGROUND: Multimorbid patients with hypertension experienced treatment burden from managing multiple chronic conditions. Although treatment burden can adversely affect self-care, several qualitative studies have suggested a complex relationship between the two factors. This study aimed to identify patient groups based on the level of multimorbidity treatment burden and self-care adherence and explore factors associated with these patient groups. We also examined if patients transitioned to a different group over six months and which factors were associated with either transitioning into or remaining in the ideal group (Lower burden with higher self-care) at six months. METHODS: This longitudinal study included hypertensive patients with at least two comorbidities (n = 484); 302 participants completed the 6-month follow-up. Patients were categorized into four groups based on multimorbidity treatment burden and self-care adherence levels: All-low (13.8%); Lower burden with higher self-care (26.0%); Higher burden with lower self-care (35.3%); and All-high (24.8%) groups. Multinomial logistic regression was used to explore factors associated with group membership, with the Lower burden with higher self-care group as the reference group. Binary logistic regression was used to explore factors associated with transitioning into or remaining in the ideal group at six months. RESULTS: Older age, higher levels of health literacy, better subjective cognitive function, and greater shared decision-making decreased the likelihood of being in the All-low group. Lower depressive symptoms and higher subjective cognitive function decreased the likelihood of being in both Higher burden with lower self-care and All-high groups, while older age and greater shared decision-making were only associated with the Higher burden with lower self-care group. Patients in the All-low and All-high groups frequently transitioned to another group over six months, while the other two groups remained stable. At six months, participants who were male and had higher health literacy, better subjective cognitive function, and greater involvement in shared decision-making were more likely to belong to the ideal group. CONCLUSIONS: Our study observed the complex relationship between multimorbidity treatment burden and self-care adherence in multimorbid patients with hypertension. Interventions aimed at improving shared decision-making considering patients' circumstances (e.g., emotional status) may alleviate treatment burden and enhance self-care adherence.
背景:患有多种疾病的高血压患者在管理多种慢性病时面临治疗负担。尽管治疗负担会对自我护理产生不利影响,但多项定性研究表明这两个因素之间存在复杂的关系。本研究旨在根据多种疾病治疗负担水平和自我护理依从性确定患者群体,并探索与这些患者群体相关的因素。我们还研究了患者在六个月内是否转变为不同的群体,以及哪些因素与在六个月时转变为理想群体(负担较低且自我护理较高)或留在该群体有关。 方法:这项纵向研究纳入了至少患有两种合并症的高血压患者(n = 484);302名参与者完成了6个月的随访。根据多种疾病治疗负担和自我护理依从性水平,患者被分为四组:全低组(13.8%);负担较低且自我护理较高组(26.0%);负担较高且自我护理较低组(35.3%);全高组(24.8%)。采用多项逻辑回归来探索与分组相关的因素,以负担较低且自我护理较高组作为参照组。采用二元逻辑回归来探索与在六个月时转变为理想群体或留在该群体相关的因素。 结果:年龄较大、健康素养水平较高、主观认知功能较好以及更多的共同决策降低了处于全低组的可能性。抑郁症状较轻和主观认知功能较好降低了处于负担较高且自我护理较低组和全高组的可能性,而年龄较大和更多的共同决策仅与负担较高且自我护理较低组相关。全低组和全高组的患者在六个月内经常转变为另一组,而其他两组保持稳定。在六个月时,男性、健康素养较高、主观认知功能较好且更多参与共同决策的参与者更有可能属于理想群体。 结论:我们的研究观察到患有多种疾病的高血压患者中多种疾病治疗负担与自我护理依从性之间的复杂关系。考虑患者情况(如情绪状态)改善共同决策的干预措施可能减轻治疗负担并提高自我护理依从性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-3-14
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-5-23
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-1-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-8-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-10-3
BMC Prim Care. 2024-9-28
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2024
Br J Gen Pract. 2022-11
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022-6-3