Saxena Amit, Mahore Surendra Kumar, Gupta Anshul, Sriwastava Ashish Kumar, Gupta Mansi
Department of Medicine, Government Bundelkhand Medical College, Sagar, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Department of Microbiology, Virendra Kumar Sakhlecha Government Medical College, Neemuch, Madhya Pradesh, India.
J Orthop Case Rep. 2025 Jul;15(7):275-281. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i07.5848.
Distal tibia shaft fractures pose significant treatment challenges due to limited soft tissue coverage and suboptimal vascularity in the region. Selecting the most appropriate management strategy - whether surgical or conservative - remains a subject of ongoing debate, particularly in resource-limited settings.
A prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care center in central India between October 2022 and April 2024, involving 70 skeletally mature patients with distal tibial shaft fractures. Patients were managed either conservatively or through surgical interventions, including intramedullary nailing (IMN), minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO), or external fixation. Clinical outcomes were assessed at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months post-treatment using the Modified Johner and Wruhs criteria. Radiological union, weight-bearing progression, pain severity, and complication rates were also evaluated.
The majority of patients (92.9%) underwent surgical treatment, with IMN being the most frequently used modality (46.2%), followed by MIPO (30.8%) and external fixation (23%). Conservative management was employed in 7.1% of cases. At the 12-month follow-up, full weight-bearing was achieved in 83.3% of IMN, 80% of MIPO, and a variable proportion of external fixation patients. Radiological union with more than three cortices was observed in 90% of IMN and 75% of MIPO patients by 12 months. Overall, excellent-to-good functional outcomes were achieved in 78.6% of cases. Superficial and deep infections, as well as non-union, were more common with external fixation.
IMN and MIPO demonstrated superior functional and radiological outcomes compared to external fixation and conservative methods. IMN, in particular, provided faster recovery with fewer complications, making it the preferred modality in appropriately selected cases.
由于该区域软组织覆盖有限且血运欠佳,胫骨干远端骨折带来了重大的治疗挑战。选择最合适的治疗策略——无论是手术治疗还是保守治疗——仍然是一个持续争论的话题,尤其是在资源有限的环境中。
2022年10月至2024年4月在印度中部的一家三级医疗中心进行了一项前瞻性观察研究,纳入70例骨骼成熟的胫骨干远端骨折患者。患者接受保守治疗或手术干预,包括髓内钉固定(IMN)、微创钢板接骨术(MIPO)或外固定。使用改良的约翰纳和鲁赫斯标准在治疗后6周、3个月、6个月和12个月评估临床结果。还评估了影像学骨愈合、负重进展、疼痛严重程度和并发症发生率。
大多数患者(92.9%)接受了手术治疗,其中IMN是最常用的方式(46.2%),其次是MIPO(30.8%)和外固定(23%)。7.1%的病例采用保守治疗。在12个月的随访中,83.3%的IMN患者、80%的MIPO患者和不同比例的外固定患者实现了完全负重。到12个月时,90%的IMN患者和75%的MIPO患者观察到超过三层皮质的影像学骨愈合。总体而言,78.6%的病例获得了优良的功能结果。外固定更常见浅表和深部感染以及骨不连。
与外固定和保守方法相比,IMN和MIPO显示出更好的功能和影像学结果。特别是IMN,恢复更快且并发症更少,使其成为适当选择病例中的首选方式。