• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较年轻与老年舌癌患者的临床病理特征及治疗结果——一项回顾性队列研究

Comparing clinicopathological profile and treatment outcomes in younger versus older patients with carcinoma oral tongue - a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Mahajan Shaifali, Ahlawat Parveen, Tandon Sarthak, Purohit Sandeep, Prasai Gerim, Lohani Sauharda, Gairola Munish

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2025 Jun 7;30(2):164-175. doi: 10.5603/rpor.105858. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.5603/rpor.105858
PMID:40635987
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12236761/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The rising incidence of oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC) among younger patients has raised concerns about a distinct clinical course in younger adults. This study investigated differences in demographics, clinicopathological profiles, and outcomes, such as locoregional control (LRC), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS), between younger (≤ 40 years) and older (> 40 years) OTSCC patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 650 OTSCC patients treated between 2008 and 2022 at a cancer centre was conducted. Patients were categorized into younger (≤ 40 years, n = 189) and older (> 40 years, n = 461) groups. All patients underwent upfront surgery followed by adjuvant treatment. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors for LRC, DMFS and OS.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in 3-year LRC (younger: 53.7%, older: 56.5%, p = 0.300), DMFS (younger: 57.9%, older: 61.5%, p = 0.339), and OS (younger: 59.4%, older: 62.7%, p = 0.397), median LRC (younger: 49.1 months, older: 55.7 months, p = 0.863), median DMFS (younger: 75.4 months, older: 69.1 months, p = 0.749) or median OS (younger: 75.4 months, older: 72.4 months, p = 0.831). Tumour grade, margin status, perineural invasion (PNI), nodal stage (pN), and extracapsular extension (ECE) were significant predictors of LRC and OS, but age was not.

CONCLUSION

Age is not an independent prognostic factor for OTSCC outcomes. Younger patients should not receive more aggressive treatment solely based on age. Treatment should follow standard care protocols for all OTSCC patients.

摘要

背景

年轻患者口腔舌鳞状细胞癌(OTSCC)发病率的上升引发了对年轻成年人独特临床病程的担忧。本研究调查了年轻(≤40岁)和年长(>40岁)OTSCC患者在人口统计学、临床病理特征以及局部区域控制(LRC)、无远处转移生存期(DMFS)和总生存期(OS)等预后方面的差异。

材料与方法

对2008年至2022年期间在一家癌症中心接受治疗的650例OTSCC患者进行回顾性分析。患者分为年轻组(≤40岁,n = 189)和年长组(>40岁,n = 461)。所有患者均接受了初始手术,随后进行辅助治疗。进行单因素和多因素分析以确定LRC、DMFS和OS的预后因素。

结果

3年LRC(年轻组:53.7%,年长组:56.5%,p = 0.300)、DMFS(年轻组:57.9%,年长组:61.5%,p = 0.339)和OS(年轻组:59.4%,年长组:62.7%,p = 0.397),中位LRC(年轻组:49.1个月,年长组:55.7个月,p = 0.863),中位DMFS(年轻组:75.4个月,年长组:69.1个月,p = 0.749)或中位OS(年轻组:75.4个月,年长组:72.4个月,p = 0.831)均无显著差异。肿瘤分级、切缘状态、神经周围浸润(PNI)、淋巴结分期(pN)和包膜外扩展(ECE)是LRC和OS的显著预测因素,但年龄不是。

结论

年龄不是OTSCC预后的独立预测因素。年轻患者不应仅基于年龄接受更积极的治疗。治疗应遵循所有OTSCC患者的标准护理方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/188c/12236761/b0bfb88af8e3/rpor-30-2-164f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/188c/12236761/6233a2bee3b3/rpor-30-2-164f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/188c/12236761/b0bfb88af8e3/rpor-30-2-164f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/188c/12236761/6233a2bee3b3/rpor-30-2-164f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/188c/12236761/b0bfb88af8e3/rpor-30-2-164f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing clinicopathological profile and treatment outcomes in younger versus older patients with carcinoma oral tongue - a retrospective cohort study.比较年轻与老年舌癌患者的临床病理特征及治疗结果——一项回顾性队列研究
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2025 Jun 7;30(2):164-175. doi: 10.5603/rpor.105858. eCollection 2025.
2
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.卡莫司汀植入剂与替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的高级别胶质瘤的有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450.
3
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.原发性手术后晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者残留病灶对生存预后的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD015048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015048.pub2.
4
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
5
Optimisation of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for untreated Hodgkin lymphoma patients with respect to second malignant neoplasms, overall and progression-free survival: individual participant data analysis.未治疗的霍奇金淋巴瘤患者化疗和放疗在第二原发性恶性肿瘤、总生存期和无进展生存期方面的优化:个体参与者数据分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 13;9(9):CD008814. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008814.pub2.
6
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
7
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
8
Treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in the elderly: a network meta-analysis.老年新诊断胶质母细胞瘤的治疗:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 23;3(3):CD013261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013261.pub2.
9
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
10
Clinicopathological Characteristics, Prognostic Factors, and Treatment Outcomes of Patients with Oral Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Glossectomy: A Tertiary Oncology Center Experience.舌切除术治疗口腔舌鳞状细胞癌患者的临床病理特征、预后因素及治疗结果:一家三级肿瘤中心的经验
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Oct;76(5):3845-3853. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-04720-w. Epub 2024 May 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of smokeless tobacco use in India and its association with various occupations: A LASI study.印度无烟烟草使用的流行情况及其与各种职业的关联:一项 LASI 研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 27;11:1005103. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1005103. eCollection 2023.
2
Radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer in elderly patients: results and prognostic factors a single cohort.老年局部晚期头颈癌患者的放射治疗:单队列研究结果及预后因素
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2021 Feb 25;26(1):12-19. doi: 10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0002. eCollection 2021.
3
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prognostic role of age in oral tongue cancer.
口腔舌癌中年龄的预后作用的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancer Med. 2021 Apr;10(8):2566-2578. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3795. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
4
Survival of Young Versus Old Patients With Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.年轻与老年口腔鳞状细胞癌患者的生存比较:一项荟萃分析。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Jun;131(6):1310-1319. doi: 10.1002/lary.29260. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
5
The impact of comorbidities on survival in oral cancer patients: a population-based, case-control study.共病对口腔癌患者生存的影响:一项基于人群的病例对照研究。
Acta Oncol. 2021 Feb;60(2):173-179. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2020.1836393. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
6
Older age is a risk factor associated with poor prognosis of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.高龄是口腔鳞状细胞癌患者预后不良的一个相关危险因素。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Sep;277(9):2573-2580. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-05963-3. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
7
Meta-analysis on risk factors of squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue in young adults.青年舌鳞状细胞癌危险因素的Meta分析
J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2019 Sep-Dec;23(3):450-457. doi: 10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_118_19.
8
Survival of oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma in young adults.年轻人口腔舌鳞状细胞癌的生存情况。
Head Neck. 2019 Sep;41(9):2960-2968. doi: 10.1002/hed.25772. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
9
Prevalence of Comorbidities among Older Head and Neck Cancer Survivors in the United States.美国老年头颈部癌症幸存者合并症的患病率。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Jan;160(1):85-92. doi: 10.1177/0194599818796163. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
10
Analysis of the outcome of young age tongue squamous cell carcinoma.年轻舌鳞状细胞癌的预后分析。
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Dec 25;39(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40902-017-0139-8. eCollection 2017 Dec.