Yatsuyanagi Misako, Shimada Tomoyuki
Department of Breast Surgery, Hiraka General Hospital, Japan.
J Rural Med. 2025 Jul;20(3):225-232. doi: 10.2185/jrm.2025-009. Epub 2025 Jul 1.
Standard treatment modalities, including surgery, are desirable, even in older adults with breast cancer. However, frailty and comorbidities may limit surgery. This study aimed to evaluate whether endocrine therapy (ET) is associated with a lower survival rate than a standard surgical regimen.
In this retrospective observational study, older adults (aged ≥75 years) diagnosed with nonmetastatic hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, primary breast cancer who were treated between 2006 and 2022 were evaluated in the ET (n=33) and surgery (n=95) groups. Survival status and cause of death were analyzed by estimating the overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) rates. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify survival-associated factors. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce the effect of selection bias.
The median ages of the ET and surgery groups were 84.6 and 80.4 years, respectively, and their mortality rates were 12.5% and 17.2%, respectively. OS and BCSS were significantly higher in the surgery group than in the ET group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.27, =0.0014 and HR 0.66, =0.029, respectively). Age, performance status, and treatment regimen proved to have a significant effect on OS and BCSS in univariate analysis. Only age and treatment affected OS; however, no factors were shown to affect BCSS in multivariate analysis. After PSM, the OS rates were higher in the surgery group than in the ET group (HR 0.23, <0.001); however, no differences in BCSS rates were found.
ET may be an appropriate treatment option for older adults with breast cancer without sufficient life expectancies.
即使对于老年乳腺癌患者,包括手术在内的标准治疗方式仍是可取的。然而,身体虚弱和合并症可能会限制手术。本研究旨在评估内分泌治疗(ET)与标准手术方案相比是否生存率更低。
在这项回顾性观察研究中,对2006年至2022年间接受治疗的年龄≥75岁、诊断为非转移性激素受体阳性、HER2阴性原发性乳腺癌的老年患者进行了评估,分为ET组(n = 33)和手术组(n = 95)。通过估计总生存率(OS)和乳腺癌特异性生存率(BCSS)来分析生存状况和死亡原因。进行单因素和多因素分析以确定生存相关因素。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来减少选择偏倚的影响。
ET组和手术组的中位年龄分别为84.6岁和80.4岁,死亡率分别为12.5%和17.2%。手术组的OS和BCSS显著高于ET组(风险比[HR]分别为0.27,P = 0.0014和HR 0.66,P = 0.029)。在单因素分析中,年龄、体能状态和治疗方案对OS和BCSS有显著影响。只有年龄和治疗影响OS;然而,在多因素分析中没有因素显示会影响BCSS。PSM后,手术组的OS率高于ET组(HR 0.23,P < 0.001);然而,BCSS率没有差异。
对于预期寿命不足的老年乳腺癌患者,ET可能是一种合适的治疗选择。