Suppr超能文献

体内防晒霜防晒系数值的变异性。

The variability of in vivo sunscreen sun protection factor values.

作者信息

Cole Curtis, Colson Bertrand, Uhlig Steffen

机构信息

Sun & Skin Consulting LLC, New Holland, New Holland, Pennsylvania, USA.

QuoData GmbH, Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Cosmet Sci. 2025 Sep;47 Suppl 1:25-36. doi: 10.1111/ics.70000. Epub 2025 Jul 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Determination of the sunburn protection provided by a sunscreen product is required globally for sales of these products. Over the past 80 years, many aspects of determining the protection 'factor' have evolved and been modified, with varying levels of impact on the sunburn protection factor (SPF) value. In order to compare new non-invasive and in vitro methods against traditional SPF test protocols, a large, multi-center clinical trial was conducted to establish the level of equivalence of these new methods with the current codified testing standard ISO24444 ([1]: Cosmetics - sun protection methods - in vivo determination of the sun protection factor (SPF), 2019). This report reports the variability found in the in vivo determination of SPF values.

METHODS

Thirty-two products of varying levels of sunburn and UVA protection, in a variety of formulation vehicles and ultraviolet (UV) filter combinations and concentrations, were coded and sent to pre-qualified in vivo SPF testing laboratories. The products were divided into eight product groups (four products per product group). For each product group, samples were sent to four laboratories (across product groups, a total of 12 laboratories participated). Precision and trueness estimates were calculated separately for each product group. 'Expected' SPF values were not provided to the test laboratories. However, laboratories were informed as to whether the 'true' SPF was less than or greater than 25.

RESULTS

Interlaboratory variability for samples was proportional to the SPF of the products, with high SPF products having higher variability. Intra-laboratory variability (repeatability) was much lower than the interlaboratory variability.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the fact that the interlaboratory variability of SPF results is considerable and is likely greater than expected by the public and regulatory bodies.

摘要

目的

全球范围内,防晒产品销售需要测定其提供的晒伤防护能力。在过去80年里,确定防护“系数”的许多方面都有所发展和修改,对晒伤防护系数(SPF)值产生了不同程度的影响。为了将新的非侵入性和体外方法与传统的SPF测试方案进行比较,开展了一项大型多中心临床试验,以确定这些新方法与当前编纂的测试标准ISO24444([1]:化妆品 - 防晒方法 - 体内测定防晒系数(SPF),2019年)的等效水平。本报告报告了体内测定SPF值时发现的变异性。

方法

32种具有不同晒伤和UVA防护水平的产品,包含各种配方载体以及紫外线(UV)过滤剂组合和浓度,进行编码后被送往经过预认证的体内SPF测试实验室。这些产品被分为8个产品组(每组4种产品)。对于每个产品组,样本被送往4个实验室(跨产品组,共有12个实验室参与)。分别计算每个产品组的精密度和准确性估计值。未向测试实验室提供“预期”SPF值。然而,告知了实验室“真实”SPF是小于还是大于25。

结果

样本的实验室间变异性与产品的SPF成正比,高SPF产品的变异性更高。实验室内变异性(重复性)远低于实验室间变异性。

结论

本研究突出了一个事实,即SPF结果的实验室间变异性相当大,可能比公众和监管机构预期的更大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验