Louwaege Heidi, Boeykens Kurt, De Waele Elisabeth, Beeckman Dimitri, Torsy Tim
University Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium.
Nutrition Support Team, VITAZ Hospital, Sint-Niklaas, Belgium.
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2025 Jul 8;69:188-195. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.07.012.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: In ventilated critically ill patients, both overfeeding and underfeeding can be harmful. Determining energy expenditure is challenging due to various factors. Accurate estimation of nutritional requirements is essential for optimal care. This study compared resting energy expenditure in patients on full-dose high protein-to-energy tube feeding, using indirect calorimetry (IC) and the Roza & Shizgal (R&S) formula. It also examined the effects of sex, age, BMI, primary diagnoses, and non-intentional energy intake, and assessed adherence to European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism guidelines on protein intake.
A retrospective cohort study included 178 ventilated ICU patients who received ≥7 days of full-dose high-protein enteral tube feeding between June 2019 and December 2022. IC was compared to the R&S formula, and 24-h nutritional intake data, including non-intentional sources, were analysed. Multivariate regression identified predictors of energy expenditure differences.
A significant difference of -146.64 kcal (SD = 276.38) was found between measured and estimated resting energy expenditure, with severe or morbid obesity and COVID-19 pneumonia as significant predictors. This difference increased when non-intentional energy intake in the preceding 24 h was considered (M = -514.51; SD = 326.37). When excluding non-intentional energy intake, patients achieved the ESPEN daily protein target of ≥1.3 g/kg actual or adjusted body weight/day, with averages of 1.3-1.5 g/kg using both indirect calorimetry and the Roza & Shizgal formula.
The Roza & Shizgal formula for estimating resting energy expenditure can overestimate or underestimate, so caution is needed, especially in severely to morbidly obese patients. Monitoring energy intake is important, particularly in tube feeding. Protein targets per international guidelines are generally met, except in patients with high non-intentional energy intake.
在机械通气的危重症患者中,过度喂养和喂养不足均可能有害。由于多种因素,确定能量消耗具有挑战性。准确估计营养需求对于优化治疗至关重要。本研究比较了使用间接测热法(IC)和罗扎与希兹加尔(R&S)公式的全剂量高蛋白能量管饲患者的静息能量消耗。还研究了性别、年龄、体重指数、主要诊断和非故意能量摄入的影响,并评估了对欧洲临床营养与代谢学会蛋白质摄入指南的依从性。
一项回顾性队列研究纳入了2019年6月至2022年12月期间接受≥7天全剂量高蛋白肠内管饲的178例机械通气ICU患者。将IC与R&S公式进行比较,并分析包括非故意来源在内的24小时营养摄入数据。多变量回归确定了能量消耗差异的预测因素。
测量的和估计的静息能量消耗之间存在显著差异,为-146.64千卡(标准差=276.38),严重或病态肥胖以及新冠肺炎肺炎是显著预测因素。当考虑前24小时的非故意能量摄入时,这种差异会增加(M=-514.51;标准差=326.37)。排除非故意能量摄入后,患者达到了欧洲临床营养与代谢学会每日蛋白质目标,即实际或调整体重≥1.3克/千克/天,使用间接测热法和罗扎与希兹加尔公式的平均值均为1.3-1.5克/千克。
用于估计静息能量消耗的罗扎与希兹加尔公式可能高估或低估,因此需要谨慎,尤其是在严重至病态肥胖患者中。监测能量摄入很重要,尤其是在管饲时。除了非故意能量摄入高的患者外,一般符合国际指南的蛋白质目标。