Suppr超能文献

光动力疗法与热疗的相互作用:对小鼠进行体内治疗后的肿瘤反应及细胞存活研究

Interaction of photodynamic therapy and hyperthermia: tumor response and cell survival studies after treatment of mice in vivo.

作者信息

Henderson B W, Waldow S M, Potter W R, Dougherty T J

出版信息

Cancer Res. 1985 Dec;45(12 Pt 1):6071-7.

PMID:4063964
Abstract

The interaction of photodynamic therapy (PDT) and hyperthermia was studied in the radiation-induced-fibrosarcoma experimental mouse tumor system by tumor regrowth experiments as well as in vivo to in vitro cloning assays. In vivo, PDT (Photofrin II, 10 mg/kg i.p.), followed 24 h later by light (135 J/cm2, 630 nm) and/or heat (44 degrees C, 30 min) caused severe vascular damage (congestion of tumor vessels and hemorrhage) and subsequent disappearance of palpable tumor mass. While heat-treated tumors always started to regrow within 2 days of treatment, regrowth if it occurred was delayed to 4-5 days after PDT and 6-7 days following combined treatments. Only PDT followed by heat cured a considerable number of animals (45%), while PDT alone and heat followed by PDT cured less than 10% of animals, and heat alone caused no tumor cures. The various treatments differed in their immediate as well as their delayed effects on tumor clonogenicity when observed over a 24-h period. Tumors treated with PDT showed no immediate changes in clonogenicity, but progressive delayed cell death occurred if tumors remained in situ. Heat alone led to an immediate reduction in the number of clonogenic tumor cells, followed by some additional cell death for 4 h and subsequent recovery of clonogenicity. PDT followed by heat caused markedly potentiated immediate reduction in cell survival which may be the result of direct interaction of heat and PDT damage affecting the tumor cells. Some tumors rapidly progressed to total eradication, whereas others showed delayed survival values similar to those for tumor having received PDT only. In the reverse sequence, heat before PDT, the tumor cell survival kinetics resembled those following heat treatment alone. The comparative lack of effectiveness of this treatment regimen can be explained by the severe tumor hemorrhage caused by the initial heat treatment which reduces the transmission of light essential for the subsequent PDT treatment. This study shows that despite pronounced similarities in the microscopic and macroscopic appearance shortly after treatment by PDT or hyperthermia, these two modalities lead to tumor destruction by different mechanisms. Furthermore the combination of these two modalities in the proper sequence leads to potentiated cytocidal effects on the tumor cells in vivo.

摘要

通过肿瘤再生长实验以及体内到体外克隆分析,在辐射诱导的纤维肉瘤实验小鼠肿瘤系统中研究了光动力疗法(PDT)与热疗的相互作用。在体内,腹腔注射10mg/kg的光敏剂Ⅱ(Photofrin II),24小时后进行光照(135J/cm²,630nm)和/或加热(44℃,30分钟),会导致严重的血管损伤(肿瘤血管充血和出血),随后可触及的肿瘤肿块消失。虽然热疗后的肿瘤总是在治疗后2天内开始再生长,但如果发生再生长,在PDT后会延迟到4 - 5天,联合治疗后会延迟到6 - 7天。只有先进行PDT再进行热疗能治愈相当数量的动物(45%),而单独的PDT以及先热疗再进行PDT只能治愈不到10%的动物,单独热疗则不能治愈肿瘤。在24小时的观察期内,各种治疗对肿瘤克隆形成能力的即时和延迟影响有所不同。接受PDT治疗的肿瘤在克隆形成能力上没有即时变化,但如果肿瘤原位留存,则会发生渐进性的延迟细胞死亡。单独热疗会导致克隆性肿瘤细胞数量立即减少,随后4小时内会有一些额外的细胞死亡,随后克隆形成能力恢复。先进行PDT再进行热疗会导致细胞存活率立即显著降低,这可能是热疗和PDT损伤直接相互作用影响肿瘤细胞的结果。一些肿瘤迅速发展至完全根除,而另一些则显示出与仅接受PDT治疗的肿瘤相似的延迟存活值。在相反的顺序中,先进行热疗再进行PDT,肿瘤细胞存活动力学类似于单独热疗后的情况。这种治疗方案相对缺乏有效性可以通过初始热疗引起的严重肿瘤出血来解释,这会减少后续PDT治疗所需的光传输。这项研究表明,尽管在PDT或热疗治疗后不久,微观和宏观外观有明显相似之处,但这两种方式通过不同机制导致肿瘤破坏。此外,这两种方式按适当顺序联合使用会增强对体内肿瘤细胞的杀细胞作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验