Demarquette Achille, Jeanneteau Audrey, Blanchard-Daguet Aymeric, Fouquet Olivier, Parot-Schinkel Elsa, Lasocki Sigismond, Rineau Emmanuel, Léger Maxime
Département d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, Angers, France.
Département d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, Angers, France.
Br J Anaesth. 2025 Sep;135(3):764-771. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2025.05.043. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
Pain is common after cardiac surgery and can impair recovery. Regional anaesthesia has been proposed to limit pain, but its impact on recovery is unknown. This study compared the impact of superficial or deep parasternal intercostal plane blocks (SPIP or DPIP) in addition to standard care vs standard care alone on postoperative quality of recovery (QoR) after cardiac surgery with sternotomy.
In this single-centre, randomised, single-blind, controlled trial, adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with sternotomy were randomly assigned to one of three groups (with a 1:1:1 allocation ratio): control group (standard care without regional anaesthesia), SPIP group, or DPIP group. The primary endpoint was QoR assessed using a French validated version of the Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire at 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores, analgesic consumption, ICU and hospital length of stay, and adverse events.
Between July 1, 2022, and August 30, 2023, we randomised 254 patients (81.1% men, 65.5 [27-85] yr). The French validated version of the Quality of Recovery-15 scores did not significantly differ between any parasternal block group (SPIP or DPIP) and the standard care group (P=0.248). Postoperative pain and analgesic consumption were similar across groups, with low pain scores (median [interquartile range] 24-h numerical rating scale: 2.0 [3.0-0.0]). There were more pneumothoraces in the DPIP group (P=0.032). No significant differences were observed for other complications.
Regional anaesthesia by parasternal intercostal plane blocks after sternotomy did not improve QoR at 24 h compared with standard care.
NCT05345639.
心脏手术后疼痛很常见,且会影响恢复。有人提出区域麻醉可减轻疼痛,但其对恢复的影响尚不清楚。本研究比较了在胸骨切开心脏手术后,除标准护理外,浅表或深部胸骨旁肋间平面阻滞(SPIP或DPIP)与单纯标准护理对术后恢复质量(QoR)的影响。
在这项单中心、随机、单盲、对照试验中,接受胸骨切开心脏手术的成年患者被随机分配到三组之一(分配比例为1:1:1):对照组(无区域麻醉的标准护理)、SPIP组或DPIP组。主要终点是术后24小时使用法国验证版的恢复质量-15问卷评估的QoR。次要结局包括术后疼痛评分、镇痛药物消耗量、重症监护病房(ICU)和住院时间以及不良事件。
在2022年7月1日至2023年8月30日期间,我们随机分配了254例患者(81.1%为男性,年龄65.5[27 - 85]岁)。任何胸骨旁阻滞组(SPIP或DPIP)与标准护理组之间,法国验证版的恢复质量-15评分无显著差异(P = 0.248)。各组术后疼痛和镇痛药物消耗量相似,疼痛评分较低(24小时数字评分量表中位数[四分位间距]:2.0[3.0 - 0.0])。DPIP组气胸更多(P = 0.032)。其他并发症未观察到显著差异。
与标准护理相比,胸骨切开术后胸骨旁肋间平面阻滞区域麻醉在24小时时并未改善QoR。
NCT05345639。