Staab H J, Ahlemann L M, Anderer F A, Zwirner M, Schindler A E
Cancer Detect Prev. 1985;8(1-2):35-45.
The clinical validity of tumor markers in breast cancer is reevaluated. Though ideal tumor markers are presently not available for breast cancer patients, optimizing markers can be achieved, applying markers in special situations and in selected fields of oncology. Tumor markers like carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and tissue polypeptide antigen are only of limited value in the primary diagnosis of breast cancer due to their low sensitivity and their poor specificity. Single postsurgical CEA values in selected groups of mammary carcinomas, however, can be used to predict patients with high risk of recurrence and they imply considerable prognostic information. Serial CEA determination in the follow-up of patients with operated breast cancer are highly sensitive in early detection of recurrences and are also useful in controlling therapy in individual cases. The biological basis of tumor marker measurements reflecting tumor growth is pointed out and newly developed methodologies for the potential establishment of more specific tumor markers for serodiagnosis and for immunolocalization of tumors are discussed.
对乳腺癌肿瘤标志物的临床有效性进行了重新评估。虽然目前尚未有适用于乳腺癌患者的理想肿瘤标志物,但通过在肿瘤学的特殊情况和特定领域应用标志物,可以实现优化。癌胚抗原(CEA)和组织多肽抗原等肿瘤标志物由于其低敏感性和差特异性,在乳腺癌的初步诊断中价值有限。然而,在特定组别的乳腺癌患者术后单次CEA值可用于预测复发高风险患者,并且它们暗示了相当多的预后信息。在接受手术的乳腺癌患者随访中进行连续CEA测定,对复发的早期检测高度敏感,并且在个别病例的治疗控制中也很有用。指出了反映肿瘤生长的肿瘤标志物测量的生物学基础,并讨论了可能建立用于血清诊断和肿瘤免疫定位的更特异性肿瘤标志物的新开发方法。