Dehghan Marvast Ali, Aliakbari Mohsen, Monzavi Amir Mohammad, Salehi Ashkan, Shahsavan Mohammad
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2025;13(6):349-358. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2024.83645.3806.
High ulnar nerve injuries often cause severe functional impairment, and the best secondary repair method remains debated. This study compared the effectiveness of sural nerve grafting and anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) transfer following failed primary ulnar nerve repairs.
This retrospective cohort study included 42 patients with isolated high ulnar nerve injuries who required secondary surgical intervention. Patients were allocated to either the sural nerve grafting (n = 23) or AIN transfer (n = 19) group based on predefined clinical criteria. Motor and sensory functions were assessed using the British Medical Research Council (BMRC) grading system and a two-point discrimination (2PD) test. Grip and pinch strength were measured, and functional recovery was evaluated using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire.
The AIN transfer group exhibited significantly superior motor recovery, with 68.5% of patients achieving BMRC grades M4-M5, compared to only 17.4% in the sural grafting group (P = 0.03). Sensory recovery was also markedly better in the AIN group, with a higher proportion of patients reaching BMRC sensory grades S3-S4 (P = 0.04). Additionally, the AIN transfer group demonstrated significantly greater grip strength (30.1 ± 6.1 kg vs. 24.3 ± 5.2 kg; P = 0.03) and pinch strength (7.2 ± 1.5 kg vs. 5.8 ± 1.3 kg; P = 0.04). Improvement in DASH scores was more substantial in the AIN group (-26.6 ± 5.7 vs. -14.6 ± 4.3; P = 0.02), indicating better functional recovery. Although the AIN group showed a trend toward improved 2PD, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.18).
AIN transfer provides superior outcomes compared to sural nerve grafting for the secondary repair of high ulnar nerve injuries, demonstrating significantly enhanced motor and sensory recovery, grip and pinch strength, and overall functional improvement.
高位尺神经损伤常导致严重的功能障碍,最佳的二期修复方法仍存在争议。本研究比较了一期尺神经修复失败后腓肠神经移植和骨间前神经(AIN)移位的有效性。
这项回顾性队列研究纳入了42例需要二期手术干预的孤立性高位尺神经损伤患者。根据预先定义的临床标准,将患者分为腓肠神经移植组(n = 23)或AIN移位组(n = 19)。使用英国医学研究委员会(BMRC)分级系统和两点辨别觉(2PD)测试评估运动和感觉功能。测量握力和捏力,并使用手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)问卷评估功能恢复情况。
AIN移位组的运动恢复明显更好,68.5%的患者达到BMRC M4 - M5级,而腓肠神经移植组仅为17.4%(P = 0.03)。AIN组的感觉恢复也明显更好,达到BMRC感觉S3 - S4级的患者比例更高(P = 0.04)。此外,AIN移位组的握力(30.1±6.1kg对24.3±5.2kg;P = 0.03)和捏力(7.2±1.5kg对5.8±1.3kg;P = 0.04)明显更大。AIN组的DASH评分改善更显著(-26.6±5.7对-14.6±4.3;P = 0.02),表明功能恢复更好。虽然AIN组的2PD有改善趋势,但差异无统计学意义(P = 0.18)。
对于高位尺神经损伤的二期修复,与腓肠神经移植相比,AIN移位提供了更好的结果,显示出运动和感觉恢复、握力和捏力以及整体功能改善显著增强。